Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 824))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 233 Accesses

Abstract

New types of wearable products with electronics and intelligent components are rapidly entering the global consumer marketplace. These new wearable technologies have greater need for fit precision to function properly with broad demographics. However, traditional anthropometric averages and human 3D models alone are proving to be insufficient for achieving the fit required. Effective product development requires iterative use of human subjects starting early in the design process. The fit testing must be continued throughout the process with close communication with industrial design and various engineering teams. This process is particularly important for products that are the first of their kind and thus have no precedents to follow.

This paper will review the effective fit study process developed at various institutions to ensure correct fit and comfort on highly technological products. The process was applied and proven at a new technology startup in Florida, Magic Leap Inc. The result was not only an effective fit for their target market, but also an elegant design which is comfortable to wear for a long duration of time and intuitive for consumer to interact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Heard JL, Hayes DO, Ferrer JJ, Zilgalvis A (1969) Design of an airborne helmet mounted display: final Technical report, Accession Number AD0701385, Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cohen BJ, Markoff JL (1972) Integrated helmet mounted sight and display special human factors report: The presentation of different visual information to each eye. Honeywell, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, Systems and Research Report Number IHMS/D-SR, December 1972

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blackwell SU, Robinette KM (1993) Human integration evaluation of three helmet systems, Technical report, AL-TR-1993-0028, Armstrong Laboratory, Crew Systems Directorate. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 45433

    Google Scholar 

  4. Choi HJ, Zehner GF, Hudson JA (2010) A manual for the performance of protective equipment Fit-Mapping, Technical report, AFRL-RH-WP-SR-2010-0005. http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA519894

  5. Seat Guru Seat Comparison Charts Page. https://www.seatguru.com/charts/generalcharts.php. Accessed 12 Apr 2018

  6. Harrison CR, Robinette KM (2002) CAESAR: summary statistics for the adult population (Ages 18–65) of the United Stated of America, AFRL-HE-WP-TR-2002-0170, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB. http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA406674

  7. Robinette K, Veitch D (2016) Sustainable sizing. Hum Factors 58(5):657–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720816649091. Epub 26 May 2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mellian SA, Ervin C, Robinette KM (1990) Sizing evaluation of Navy women’s uniforms. Technical report No. 182, Navy Clothing and Textile Research Facility, Natick, MA and AL-TR-1991-0116, Armstrong Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zehner GF, Ervin C, Robinette KM, Daziens P (1987) Fit evaluation of female body armor, Technical report AAMRL-TR-87-046, Armstrong Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 45433. http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA188721

  10. Robinette KM (2007) Maximizing anthropometric accommodation and protection. AFRL-RH-WP-TR-2008-0022, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, 45433-7947. http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/ADA478783

  11. Dainoff M, Gordon C, Robinette K, Strauss M (2003) Guidelines for using anthropometry data in product design, HFES 300 Committee, HFES Institute Best Practices Series, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathleen M. Robinette .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Robinette, K.M., Natsume, G.S. (2019). Effective Wearable Design. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 824. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics