Skip to main content

Proposal of a Methodological Model for the Design of a Complex Dynamic Working Environment in the Forestry Sector, to Generate an Emotionally Light Habitat

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018) (IEA 2018)

Abstract

The research is aimed at proposing a methodological model for the design of a complex dynamic working environment in the forest sector, incorporating methods derived from affective engineering, to generate an emotionally light work environment. The research scenario corresponds to the coordination and control centers of forest fires in Chile. The optimization of the conditions of the space and its content, could contribute to improve the performance required for efficient and harmonious decision making in demanding situations. Unfortunately, their operators have not been involved into the design process of their work environment, even though they are the ones who know best about the functional and emotional benefits required. The methodological approach includes an active operators participation by the application of methods and instruments specific to affective engineering to capture the emotions of individuals in front of simultaneous and varied stimuli, the use of technological equipment to diagnose and define the characteristics of the space and the objects that appear in it, design of proposals, evaluation of the proposals by the users, final proposal design and user studies. The novelty of this research is the possibility of defining a methodological model based on the study of dynamic environments, generating as a result a proposal that contributes both directly into this field and to the theoretical and empirical basis built by the international scientific community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alesina I, Lupton E (2010) Exploring materials: creative design for everyday objets. Princeton Architectural Press, Nueva York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barrera D (2017) Emergencia incendios forestales 2017. Oficina de Estudios y Políticas Agrarias, Santiago de Chile. F:/2018/ENSOSP%20JUIN/incendios2017.pdf. Accessed 21 May 2018

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bedolla D (2002) Diseño sensorial. Las nuevas pautas para la innovación, especialización y personalización del producto. Tesis doctoral Universidad Politécnica de Cataluña, Barcelona, 369

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blanchot M (1992) El espacio literario. Paidós Ibérica, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  5. Caroly S, Barchellini F (2013) Le développement de l’activité collective. In: Falzon P (ed) Ergonomie constructive. PUF, Paris, pp 33–46

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Cellier JM, Eyrolle H, Marine C (1997) Expertise in dynamic environments. Ergonomics 40(1):28–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Centro Tecnológico para el Diseño y la Producción Industrial de Asturias [Prodintec] (2011). Diseño Afectivo e Ingeniería Kansei, Guía Metodológica. Fundación Prodintec, Gijón

    Google Scholar 

  8. Corporación Nacional Forestal [CONAF]: CUENTA PÚBLICA PARTICIPATIVA Corporación Nacional Forestal 2014–2016 (2016). Santiago de Chile: Ministerio de Agricultura. http://www.conaf.cl/wp-content/files_mf/1493150325CPPConaf20142016.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2018

  9. Desmet P, Hekkert P (2009) Design & emotion. Int J Des 3(2):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoc JM, Amalberti R, Cellier JM, Grosjean M (2004) Adaptation et gestion des risques en situation dynamique. In: Hoc JM, Darses F (eds) Psycologie ergonomique: tendences actuelles. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, pp 15–48

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lucas R, Diener E, Larsen R (2003) Measuring positive emotions In: Lopez SJ, Snyder CR, (eds) Positive psychological assessment. A handbook of models and measures. American Psychological Association, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nagamachi M (1995) Kansei engineering: a new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. Int J Ind Ergon 15:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mehrabian A (1976) Public places and private spaces: the psychology of work, play, and living environments. Basic Books, Nueva York

    Google Scholar 

  14. Milton A, Rodgers P (2013) Métodos de Investigación para el Diseño de Producto. Blume, Barcelona, p 70

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pavard B (2000) Apport des théories de la complexité à l’étude des systèmes coopératifs. In: Benchekroun TH, Weill-Fassina A (eds) Le travail collectif. Perspectives actuelles en ergonomie. Octarès, Toulouse, pp 19–33

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pavard B, Dugdale J (2006) The contribution of complexity theory to the study of socio-technical cooperative systems. In: Minai AA, Bar-Yam Y (eds) Unifying themes in complex systems. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-35866-4_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Pavard B, Dugdale J, Bellamine-Ben Saoud N, Darcy S, Salambier P (2009) Conception de systèmes socio-technique robustes. In: De Terssac G, Boissières I, Gaillard I (eds) La sécurité en action. Octarès, Toulouse, pp 67–80

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rogalski J (2005) Dialectique entre processus de conceptualisation, processus de transposition didactique de situations professionnelles et analyse de l’activité. In: Pastré P, Rabardel P (eds) Apprendre par simulation. Octarès, Toulouse, pp 311–334

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jimena Alarcón Castro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Castro, J.A., Maureira, F. (2019). Proposal of a Methodological Model for the Design of a Complex Dynamic Working Environment in the Forestry Sector, to Generate an Emotionally Light Habitat. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018). IEA 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 824. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96071-5_221

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics