Skip to main content

Life in Action: Nutritive Souls in Aristotle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Life Concepts from Aristotle to Darwin

Abstract

Aristotle saw nutrition as the most fundamental life activity, the ability to turn not-self into self. That activity undergirds and supports all the others. He spoke concretely of three souls, identified by their life activities. Vegetables operate through nutrition and reproduction. They consume resources and have offspring. Animals interact with their environment through sensation and locomotion. They have the vegetable activities but they also sense and respond to stimuli. Finally, humans reason. Aristotle provides both etiological and a physiological accounts of vegetable souls. The etiological account can be usefully compared to evolution by natural selection. The physiological account, invoking vital heat, does not fit well with modern science. Nor do the concepts of form necessary to animal and rational souls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In Latin, anima also suggests breathing.

  2. 2.

    Hendrik Lorenz (2009) discusses whether this entails cognition of some sort in animals or even plants. It clearly does not entail reason, self-consciousness, or abstract thought, but it may require associating means and ends, if only to the extent that the living thing connects an activity with pleasure prospectively.

  3. 3.

    “thinking” here relates to nous and “calculation” to logos .

  4. 4.

    Aristotle ’s souls are physical, obeying the same rules as tangible things. They are not material, but can only be in-action and in-fulfillment in the context of a material body.

References

  • Freudenthal, Gad. Aristotle’s Theory of Material Substance: Heat and Pneuma, Form and Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, Hendrik. The Brute Within: Appetitive Desire in Plato and Aristotle. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, Hendrik. “Ancient Theories of Soul.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Summer 2009 ed. Stanford University, 1997–. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/ancient-soul/.

  • Mix, Lucas J. “Nested Explanation in Aristotle and Mayr.” Synthese 193, no. 6 (2016): 1817–1832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mix, L.J. (2018). Life in Action: Nutritive Souls in Aristotle. In: Life Concepts from Aristotle to Darwin. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96047-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics