Skip to main content

Managing Hybrid Organizations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Hybrid Organizations

Abstract

In this final chapter, we summarize and develop core findings that are illustrated with examples from the empirical case studies of the volume. Three common dilemmas in managing hybrid organization are identified: (1) financing a social mission and the risk of mission drift, (2) overlap in the roles of key stakeholders and the risk of empty governance structures and (3) modernizing a hybrid while cherishing the constitutional hybrid legacy. We argue that organizations that manage to remain hybrids in times of changed institutional conditions have established multivocality, a state where different categories of stakeholders are involved in shared, although sometimes parallel, conversations. The chapter concludes that a state of multivocal conversations can be strengthened by managerial and governance skills in improvisations and versatility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aiken, M. 2006. Towards Market or State: Tensions and Opportunities in the Evolutionary Path of Three UK Social Enterprises. In Social Enterprise, ed. M. Nyssens, 259–271. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexius, S., and J. Cisneros Örnberg. 2015. Mission(s) Impossible? Configuring Values in the Governance of State-Owned Enterprises. International Journal of Public Sector Management 28 (4–5): 286–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexius, S., M. Gustavsson, and T. Sardiello. 2017. Profit-making for Mutual Benefit: The Case of Folksam 1945–2015. Score Working Paper Series (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexius, S., and K. Tamm Hallström, eds. 2014. Configuring Value Conflicts in Markets. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., and S. Dorado. 2010. Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations. Academy of Management Journal 53: 1419–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., and M. Lee. 2014. Advancing Research on Hybrid Organizing. Academy of Management Annals 8 (1): 397–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N. 1994. Politicization and Company-ization. Management Accounting Research 5: 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R., and J. March. 1963. A Behavior Theory of the Firm. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dees, J.G. 2001. The Meanings of ‘Social Entrepreneurship’. Working paper. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, B., H. Haugh, and F. Lyon. 2014. Social Enterprises as Hybrid Organizations: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 16 (4): 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A., J. Battilana, and J. Mair. 2014. The Governance of Social Enterprises: Mission Drift and Accountability Challenges in Hybrid Organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior 34: 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forssell, A., and A. Ivarsson Westerberg. 2007. Organisation frÃ¥n grunden. Stockholm: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furusten, S. 2003. God Managementkonsultation. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Institutional Theory and Organizational Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. Commercialized Professionalism on the Field of Management Consulting. Journal of Organizational Change Management 26 (2): 265–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grassl, H. 2011. Ethics and Economics: Towards a New Humanistic Synthesis for Business. Journal of Business Ethics 99 (1): 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jancsary, D., R.E. Meyer, M. Höllerer, and B. Vitaliano. 2017. Toward a Structural Model of Organizational-Level Institutional Pluralism and Logic Inter Connectedness. Organization Science 28 (6): 1150–1167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J. 2010. Social Entrepreneurship: Taking Stock and Looking Ahead. IESE Business School Working Paper No. WP-888. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1729642##.

  • March, J.G., and J.P. Olsen. 1975. The Uncertainty of the Past: Organizational Learning Under Ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research 3: 147–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. The Logic of Appropriateness. In The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, ed. R.E. Goodin, 478–497. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mars, M.M., and M. Lounsbury. 2009. Raging Against or with the Private Marketplace? Logic Hybridity and Eco-Entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Inquiry 18 (4): 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.W., and B. Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., and J.A. Waters. 1985. Of Strategies, Deliberate and Emergent. Strategic Management Journal 6 (3): 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A.C., and F. Santos. 2010. When Worlds Collide: The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands. Academy of Management Review 35: 455–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padgett, J., and W. Powell. 2012. The Emergence of Organizations and Markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint Martin, D. 2000. Building the New Managerialist State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salles-Djelic, M.-L. 2017. Building Architecture for Political Influence: Atlas and the Transnational Institutionalization of the Neoliberal Think Tank. In Power, Policy and Profit: Corporate Engagement in Politics and Governance, ed. C. Garsten and A. Sörbom, 25–44. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjöstrand, S.-E. 1992. On the Rationale Behind ‘Irrational’ Institutions. Journal of Economic Issues XXVI (4): 1007–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A.L. 1965. Social Structure and Organizations. In Handbook of Organizations, ed. J.P. March, 142–193. Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strandqvist, K. 2018. Managing in Limbo. Stockholm: Score (Work in Progress).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P.H., W. Ocasio, and M. Lounsbury. 2012. The Institutional Logics Perspective – A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zack, M. 2000. Jazz Improvisation and Organizing: Once More from the Top. Organization Science 11 (2): 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Staffan Furusten .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Furusten, S., Alexius, S. (2019). Managing Hybrid Organizations. In: Alexius, S., Furusten, S. (eds) Managing Hybrid Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95486-8_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics