Skip to main content

A Flexible Semantic KPI Measurement System

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Cloud Computing and Service Science (CLOSER 2017)

Abstract

Linked Data (LD) technology enables integrating information across disparate sources and can be exploited to perform inferencing for deriving added-value knowledge. As such, it can really support performing different kinds of analysis tasks over business process (BP) execution related information. When moving BPs in the cloud, giving rise to Business Process as a Service (BPaaS) concept, the first main challenge is to collect and link, based on a certain structure, information originating from different systems. To this end, two main ontologies are proposed in this paper to enable this structuring: a KPI and a Dependency one. Then, via exploiting these well-connected ontologies, an innovative Key Performance Indicator (KPI) analysis system is built that offers two main analysis capabilities: KPI assessment and drill-down, where the second can enable finding root causes of KPI violations. This system advances the state-of-the-art by exhibiting the capability, through the LD usage, of the flexible construction and assessment of any KPI kind, allowing experts to better explore the possible KPI space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://docs.oasis-open.org/tosca/TOSCA/v1.0/TOSCA-v1.0.html.

  2. 2.

    www.camel-dsl.org.

  3. 3.

    http://www.cloudsocket.eu.

  4. 4.

    http://aims.fao.org/aos/geopolitical.owl.

  5. 5.

    https://jersey.github.io/.

  6. 6.

    protege.stanford.edu.

  7. 7.

    https://virtuoso.openlinksw.com.

  8. 8.

    rdf4j.org.

References

  1. Karagiannis, D.: BPMS: Business Process Management Systems. SIGOIS Bull. 16, 10–13 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Caplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The balanced scorecard measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus. Rev. 70, 281–308 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chowdhary, P., Bhaskaran, K., Caswell, N.S., Chang, H., Chao, T., Chen, S.K., Dikun, M., Lei, H., Jeng, J.J., Kapoor, S., Lang, C.A., Mihaila, G., Stanoi, I., Zeng, L.: Model driven development for business performance management. IBM Syst. J. 45, 587–605 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Castellanos, M., Casati, F., Shan, M.C., Dayal, U.: IBOM: a platform for intelligent business operation management. In: ICDE, pp. 1084–1095. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Woitsch, R., Albayrak, M., Köhn, H., Utz, W., Ferrer, A.J., Iranzo, J., Leonforte, A., Gallo, A., Mihnea, V., Pacurar, R., Avasilcai, C., Arama, G., Boca, R., Griesinger, F., Seybold, D., Domaschka, J., Kritikos, K., Plexousakis, D.: D4.1 - First CloudSocket Architecture. CloudSocket European Project (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kritikos, K., Plexousakis, D.: Semantic QoS metric matching. In: ECOWS, pp. 265–274. IEEE Computer Society (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kritikos, K., Plexousakis, D., Woitsch, R.: Towards semantic KPI measurement. In: CLOSER, pp. 63–74. SciTePress, Porto (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. List, B., Korherr, B.: An evaluation of conceptual business process modelling languages. In: SAC, pp. 1532–1539. ACM, Dijon (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wetzstein, B., Karastoyanova, D., Leymann, F.: Towards management of SLA-aware business processes based on key performance indicators. In: BPMDS, Montpellier, France (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Motta, G., Pignatelli, G., Florio, M.: Performing business process knowledge base. In: First International Workshop and Summer School on Service Science, Heraklion, Greece (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pierantonio, A., Rosa, G., Silingas, D., Thönssen, B., Woitsch, R.: Metamodeling architectures for business processes in organizations. In: Proceedings of the Projects Showcase at STAF, L’Aquila, Italy. CEUR (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Friedenstab, J.P., Janiesch, C., Matzner, M., Muller, O.: Extending BPMN for business activity monitoring. In: HICSS, pp. 4158–4167. IEEE Computer Society (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Frank, U., Heise, D., Kattenstroth, H., Schauer, H.: Designing and utilising business indicator systems within enterprise models: outline of a method. In: MobIS: Modellierung zwischen SOA und Compliance Management, Saarbröcken, Germany (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. González, O., Casallas, R., Deridder, D.: MMC-BPM: a domain-specific language for business processes analysis. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2009. LNBIP, vol. 21, pp. 157–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01190-0_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. del Río-Ortega, A., Resinas, M., Durán, A., Ruiz-Cortés, A.: Using templates and linguistic patterns to define process performance indicators. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 10, 159–192 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Costello, C., Malloy, O.: Building a process performance model for business activity monitoring. In: Wojtkowski, W., Wojtkowski, G., Lang, M., Conboy, K., Barry, C. (eds.) Information Systems Development - Challenges in Practice, Theory, and Education, pp. 237–248. Springer, Boston (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-68772-8_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, R., Nigam, A., Jeng, J., Shieh, C., Wu, F.Y.: Integrated modeling of performance monitoring with business artifacts. In: ICEBE, pp. 64–71. IEEE Computer Society, Shanghai (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Seedorf, S., Schader, M.: Towards an enterprise software component ontology. In: AMCIS. Association for Information Systems (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gruschke, B.: Integrated event management: event correlation using dependency graphs. In: DSOM (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cui, Y., Nahrstedt, K.: QoS-aware dependency management for component-based systems. In: HPDC, p. 127. IEEE Computer Society (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hasselmeyer, P.: Managing dynamic service dependencies. In: DSOM, pp. 141–150. Inria, Nancy (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rossini, A., Kritikos, K., Nikolov, N., Domaschka, J., Griesinger, F., Seybold, D., Romero, D.: D2.1.3 - CloudML Implementation Documentation (Final version). Paasage project deliverable (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wetzstein, B., Leitner, P., Rosenberg, F., Brandic, I., Dustdar, S., Leymann, F.: Monitoring and analyzing influential factors of business process performance. In: EDOC, pp. 118–127. IEEE Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wetzstein, B., Ma, Z., Leymann, F.: Towards measuring key performance indicators of semantic business processes. In: Abramowicz, W., Fensel, D. (eds.) BIS 2008. LNBIP, vol. 7, pp. 227–238. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79396-0_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Diamantini, C., Potena, D., Storti, E., Zhang, H.: An ontology-based data exploration tool for key performance indicators. In: Meersman, R., et al. (eds.) OTM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8841, pp. 727–744. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45563-0_45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Kritikos, K., Pernici, B., Plebani, P., Cappiello, C., Comuzzi, M., Benbernou, S., Brandic, I., Kertész, A., Parkin, M., Carro, M.: A survey on service quality description. ACM Comput. Surv. 46, 1 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. de Medeiros, A.K.A., et al.: An outlook on semantic business process mining and monitoring. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4806, pp. 1244–1255. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-76890-6_52

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Kritikos, K., Magoutis, K., Plexousakis, D.: Towards knowledge-based assisted IaaS selection. In: CloudCom. IEEE Computer Society, Luxembourg (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zeginis, C., Kritikos, K., Plexousakis, D.: Event pattern discovery in multi-cloud service-based applications. Int. J. Syst. Serv. Oriented Eng. 5, 78–103 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kritikos, K., Plexousakis, D.: Semantic SLAs for services with Q-SLA. In: ICWS, pp. 686–689. IEEE Computer Society, San Francisco (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kritikos, K., Zegkinis, C., Seybold, D., Griesinger, F.: D3.6 - BPaaS Monitoring and Evaluation Prototypes. CloudSocket European Project (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has received funding from the European Community’s Framework Programme for Research and Innovation HORIZON 2020 (ICT-07-2014) under grant agreement number 644690 (CloudSocket).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyriakos Kritikos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kritikos, K., Plexousakis, D., Woitch, R. (2018). A Flexible Semantic KPI Measurement System. In: Ferguson, D., Muñoz, V., Cardoso, J., Helfert, M., Pahl, C. (eds) Cloud Computing and Service Science. CLOSER 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 864. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94959-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94959-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94958-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94959-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics