Abstract
Small-scale fisheries and their governance are increasingly affected by natural, social, and political issues that originate outside their immediate control and locality. This chapter explores how researchers, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and fisher organizations can collaborate in the pursuit of empowerment small-scale fisheries vis-à-vis such ‘external’ dynamics, with a focus on maritime boundaries. To do so, we first analyse how transboundary maritime issues complicate the operation and welfare of small-scale fishers and may further their marginalization. Second, we explore how transdisciplinary engagement can be key to better understanding and addressing such transboundary challenges. Taking an action-oriented approach, we analyse the opportunities and pitfalls of transdisciplinary collaboration to empower small-scale fishers through five types of intervention strategies: capacity building (strengthening fisher organizations), institution building (building bridges between disparate actors), discourse (reframing the nature of the problem), law (appealing to national or international courts), and mobilization (mobilizing fishers to confront power). Each type of intervention is illustrated with a case study from various parts of the world. We argue that despite potentially conflicting incentives, interests, and accountabilities, transdisciplinary engagement can be both a meaningful and effective practice to empower small-scale fishers vis-à-vis transboundary challenges.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amos G, Nimoho G, Fujii M et al (2014) New FAD development approach strengthens community-based fisheries management in Vanuatu. SPC Fish Newslett 144:40–47
Bavinck M, Berkes F, Charles A et al (2017) The impact of coastal grabbing on community conservation–a global reconnaissance. Mar Stud 16(1):8
Bennett NJ, Govan H, Satterfield T (2015) Ocean grabbing. Mar Policy 57:61–68
Berkes F (2010) Linkages and multilevel systems for matching governance and ecology: lessons from roving bandits. Bull Mar Sci 86:235–250
Centro Colombiano de Estudios Constitucionales (2017) Acción contra el Pacto de Bogotá. https://www.cecec.co/documentos-litigio-pacto-de-bogota. Accessed 25 Mar 2018
Cunningham S, Neiland AE, Arbuckle M et al (2009) Wealth-based fisheries management: using fisheries wealth to orchestrate sound fisheries policy in practice. Mar Res Econ 24(3):271–287
Dupont A, Baker CG (2014) East Asia’s maritime disputes: fishing in troubled waters. Wash Q 37:79–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2014.893174
Duraiappah AK, Asah ST, Brondizio ES et al (2014) Managing the mismatches to provide ecosystem services for human well-being: a conceptual framework for understanding the New Commons. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 7:94–100
Fanning L, Mahon R, McConney P et al (2007) A large marine ecosystem governance framework. Mar Policy 31:434–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2007.01.003
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2015) Voluntary guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries. http://www.fao.org/fishery/ssf/guidelines/en. Accessed 20 Mar 2018
Finkbeiner EM, Bennett NJ, Frawley TH et al (2017) Reconstructing overfishing: moving beyond Malthus for effective and equitable solutions. Fish Fish 18(6):1180–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12245
Flyvbjerg B, Landman T, Schram S (2012) Real social science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fowler A, Biekart K (2013) Relocating civil society in a politics of civic-driven change. Dev Policy Rev 31(4):463–483
Gaviria Lievano E (2014) La desintegración del Archipiélago de San Andrés y el Fallo de la Corte Internacional de la Haya. Temis, Bogotá
Isaacs M (2011) Creating action space: small-scale fisheries policy reform in South Africa. In: Jentoft S, Eide A (eds) Poverty mosaics: realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 359–382
Jentoft S (2005) Fisheries co-management as empowerment. Mar Policy 29:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2004.01.003
Kelleher A, Taulbee JL (2017) Chapter 5: building peace Norwegian style: studies in track 1,5 diplomacy. In: Carey HF (ed) Subcontracting peace: the challenges of NGO peacebuilding. Routledge, London, pp 69–84
Kooiman J et al (eds) (2005) Fish for life: interactive governance for fisheries and aquaculture. Springer, Dordrecht
Kumara H (2014) Struggle over the Negombo Lagoon. NAFSO Publication N. 37. NAFSO, Negombo. https://www.scribd.com/doc/238637669/Struggle-over-the-Negombo-Lagoon. Accessed 13 July 2017
Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M et al (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles and challenges. Sust Sci 7(1):25–43
Lund C (2010) Approaching development: an opinionated review. Prog Dev Stud 10:18–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/146499340901000102
Mitchell B (1976) Politics, fish, and international resource management: the British-Icelandic cod war. Geogr Rev 66:127–138
Mohan G, Stokke K (2000) Participatory development and empowerment: the dangers of localism. Third World Q 21:247–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590050004346
Pauly D (1994) From growth to Malthusian overfishing: stages of fisheries resources misuse. Tradit Mar Resour Manag Knowl Inf Bull 3:7–14
Pinkerton E (2017) Hegemony and resistance: disturbing patterns and hopeful signs in the impact of neoliberal policies on small-scale fisheries around the world. Mar Policy 80:1–9
Poast P (2012) Does issue linkage work? Evidence from European alliance negotiations, 1860 to 1945. Int Organ 66:277–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818312000069
Polk M (2015) Transdisciplinary co-production: designing and testing a transdisciplinary research framework for societal problem solving. Futures 65:110–122
Purcell SW, Crona BI, Lalavanua W et al (2017) Distribution of economic returns in small-scale fisheries for international markets: a value-chain analysis. Mar Policy 86:9–16
Ribot JC, Peluso NL (2003) A theory of access. Rural Sociol 68:153–181
Roszko E (2015) Maritime territorialisation as performance of sovereignty and nationhood in the South China Sea. Nations and Nationalism 21(2):230–249
Scholtens J (2016a) The elusive quest for access and collective action: North Sri Lankan fishers’ thwarted struggles against a foreign trawler fleet. Int J Commons 10(2):929–952
Scholtens J (2016b) Fishing in the margins. North Sri Lankan fisher's struggle for access in transboundary waters. Dissertation, University of Amsterdam
Scholtens J, Bavinck M (2013) South Indian trawl fisheries – assessing their governability. In: Bavinck M et al (eds) Governability of fisheries and aquaculture: theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 177–199
Scholtens J, Bavinck M (2014) Lessons for legal pluralism: investigating the challenges of transboundary fisheries governance. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 11:10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.09.017
Scholtens J, M Bavinck (forthcoming) Transforming conflicts from the bottom-up? Reflections on civil society efforts to empower marginalized fishers in postwar Sri Lanka. Ecology and Society, forthcoming
Sinha S (2012) Transnationality and the Indian Fishworkers’ Movement, 1960s–2000. J Agric Change 12(2–3):364–389
Song AM (2015) Pawns, pirates or peacemakers: fishing boats in the inter-Korean maritime boundary dispute and ambivalent governmentality. Pol Geogr 48:60–71
Song AM, Scholtens J, Stephen J et al (2017) Transboundary research in fisheries. Mar Policy 76:8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.10.023
Sowman M (2009) An evolving partnership: collaboration between ‘experts’ and a net-fishery. Gateways, Int J Commun Res Engag 2:119–143
Sowman M (2017) Turning the tide: transforming attitudes and behaviour to conservation in South African coastal areas: a case study at the Olifants Estuary. In: Armitage D, Charles T, Berkes F (eds) Governing the coastal commons. Communities, resilience and transformation. Earthscan from Routledge, New York
Stephen J, Menon A, Scholtens J et al (2013) Transboundary dialogues and the politics of scale in Palk Bay fisheries: brothers at sea? South Asia Res 33:141–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0262728013487633
Tarrow SG (2011) Power in movement: social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Thorpe A, Bennett E (2001) Globalisation and the sustainability of world fisheries: a view from Latin America. Mar Res Econ 16(2):143–164
Tilly C (1993) Contentious repertoires in Great Britain 1758–1834. Soc Sci Hist 17(2):253–280
United Nations Convention on the Law of the Seas (1982) UN General Assembly. http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2018
van Tatenhove JPM (2013) How to turn the tide: developing legitimate marine governance arrangements at the level of the regional seas. Ocean Coast Manag 71:296–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.11.004
Warner JF (2016) Of river linkage and issue linkage: transboundary conflict and cooperation on the River Meuse. Globalizations 13(6):741–766
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scholtens, J., Song, A.M., Stephen, J., Chavez, C.G., Bavinck, M., Sowman, M. (2019). Transdisciplinary Engagement to Address Transboundary Challenges for Small-Scale Fishers. In: Chuenpagdee, R., Jentoft, S. (eds) Transdisciplinarity for Small-Scale Fisheries Governance. MARE Publication Series, vol 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94938-3_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94938-3_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-94937-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-94938-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)