Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Global Bariatric Surgery pp 503–508Cite as

Proper Approach to New Bariatric Procedures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 768 Accesses

Abstract

The field of bariatric surgery has advanced significantly from the days of Mason’s original gastric bypass operation. Advancement in minimally invasive surgical techniques has allowed for widespread acceptance of several bariatric procedures. Currently, the most commonly performed bariatric procedures worldwide include the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, and biliopancreatic diversion with or without duodenal switch. As our understanding of the metabolic impact of each of these operations increases, innovators are driven to develop novel and even less invasive methods to reproduce the same results as the more traditional procedures. While innovation and development of new surgical devices and procedures are important to advance the field of bariatric surgery, a rigorous pathway of evaluation and transparent reporting is critical to obtain approval and increase its acceptance by surgeons and patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mason EE, Ito C. Gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 1969;170(3):329–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ponce J, DeMaria EJ, Nguyen NT, Hutter M, Sudan R, Morton JM. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of bariatric surgery procedures in 2015 and surgeon workforce in the United States. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016;12(9):1637–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. ASGE/ASMBS Task Force on Endoscopic Bariatric Therapy, Ginsberg GG, Chand B, CotEe GA, Dallal RM, Edmundowicz SA, Nguyen NT, Pryor A, Thompson CC. A pathway to endoscopic bariatric therapies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(5):943–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stain SC, Pryor AD, Shadduck PP, editors. The SAGES manual ethics of surgical innovation. New York: Springer; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  5. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Device approvals, denials and clearances. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/. Last accessed 7 Apr 2017.

  6. U.S. Food & Drug Administration. Device classification panels. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/Overview/ClassifyYourDevice/ucm051530.htm. Last accessed 7 Apr 2017.

  7. U.S. FDA. Device approvals. 2015. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/Recently-ApprovedDevices/ucm430692.htm. Last accessed 1 Apr 2017.

  8. Courcoulas A, Abu Dayyeh BK, Eaton L, Robinson J, Woodman G, Fusco M, Shayani V, Billy H, Pambianco D, Gostout C. Intragastric balloon as an adjunct to lifestyle intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Obes. 2017;41(3):427–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ponce J, Woodman G, Swain J, Wilson E, English W, Ikramuddin S, Bour E, Edmundowicz S, Snyder B, Soto F, Sullivan S, Holcomb R, Lehmann J, REDUCE Pivotal Trial Investigators. The REDUCE pivotal trial: a prospective, randomized controlled pivotal trial of a dual intragastric balloon for the treatment of obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(4):874–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shikora S, Toouli J, Herrera MF, Kulseng B, Zulewski H, Brancatisano R, Kow L, Pantoja JP, Johnsen G, Brancatisano A, Tweden KS, Knudson MB, Billington CJ. Vagal blocking improves glycemic control and elevated blood pressure in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Obes. 2013;2013:245683.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Morton JM, Shah SN, Wolfe BM, Apovian CM, Miller CJ, Tweden KS, Billington CJ, Shikora SA. Effect of vagal nerve blockade on moderate obesity with an obesity-related comorbid condition: the ReCharge study. Obes Surg. 2016;26(5):983–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ikramuddin S, Blackstone RP, Brancatisano A, Toouli J, Shah SN, Wolfe BM, Fujioka K, Maher JW, Swain J, Que FG, Morton JM, Leslie DB, Brancatisano R, Kow L, O’Rourke RW, Deveney C, Takata M, Miller CJ, Knudson MB, Tweden KS, Shikora SA, Sarr MG, Billington CJ. Effect of reversible intermittent intra-abdominal vagal nerve blockade on morbid obesity: the ReCharge randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;312(9):915–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Pathway for approval for new devices and procedures. Available at: https://asmbs.org/pathway-for-approval-for-new-devices-and-procedures. Last accessed 29 Mar 2017.

  14. Stirrat GM, Farrow SC, Farndon J, Dwyer N. The challenge of evaluating surgical procedures. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1992;74(2):80–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ergina PL, Cook JA, Blazeby JM, Boutron I, Clavien PA, Reeves BC, Seiler CM, Balliol Collaboration. Challenges in evaluating surgical innovation. Lancet. 2009;374(9695):1097–104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Brethauer SA, Kim J, el Chaar M, Papasavas P, Eisenberg D, Rogers A, Ballem N, Kligman M, Kothari S, ASMBS Clinical Issues Committee. Standardized outcomes reporting in metabolic and bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(3):489–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Baker MT. The history and evolution of bariatric surgical procedures. Surg Clin N Am. 2011;91(6):1181–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Scopinaro N, Adami G, Marinari G, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion. World J Surg. 1998;22(9):936–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Clinical Issues Committee of American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Sleeve gastrectomy as a bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007;3(6):573–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brethauer SA, Hammel JP, Schauer PR. Systematic review of sleeve gastrectomy as staging and primary bariatric procedure. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(4):469–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hutter MM, Schirmer BD, Jones DB, Ko CY, Cohen ME, Merkow RP, Nguyen NT. First report from the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Center Network: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy has morbidity and effectiveness positioned between the band and the bypass. Ann Surg. 2011;254(3):410–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative (CITI) Program. Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Available at: https://about.citiprogram.org/en/series/good-clinical-practice-gcp/. Last accessed 4 Apr 2017.

  23. National Institute of Health (NIH) Office of Extramural Research. Protecting human subject research participants. Available at: https://phrp.nihtraining.com/users/login.php. Last accessed 4 Apr 2017.

  24. Sachdeva AK, Russell TR. Safe introduction of new procedures and emerging technologies in surgery: education, credentialing, and privileging. Surg Clin N Am. 2007;87(4):853–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program. Available at: https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/mbsaqip. Last accessed 7 Apr 2017.

  26. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Medical Device Reporting (MDR). Available at: https://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/Safety/ReportaProblem/default.htm. Last accessed 1 Apr 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Research, Gundersen Medical Foundation, La Crosse, WI, USA

    Kara J. Kallies

  2. Department of General Surgery, Gundersen Health System, La Crosse, WI, USA

    Shanu N. Kothari

Authors
  1. Kara J. Kallies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shanu N. Kothari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shanu N. Kothari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA

    Rami Lutfi

  2. University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Mariano Palermo

  3. Saint-Pierre University Hospital, European School of Laparoscopic Surgery, Brussels, Belgium

    Guy-Bernard Cadière

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kallies, K.J., Kothari, S.N. (2018). Proper Approach to New Bariatric Procedures. In: Lutfi, R., Palermo, M., Cadière, GB. (eds) Global Bariatric Surgery . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93545-4_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93545-4_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93544-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93545-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation