Skip to main content

The Consumer at the Heart of the Energy Markets?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In contemplating the launch and the implementation of an Energy Union, the European Commission envisioned a regulatory framework “with citizens at its core, where citizens take ownership of the energy transition, benefit from new technologies to reduce their bills, participate actively in the market, and where vulnerable consumers are protected”. Regarding the question of how consumers benefit from these objectives, the Commission Communication “Delivering a New Deal for Energy Consumers” (COM(2015) 339 final) identified a number of obstacles and highlighted areas for improvement with respect to the three mentioned pillars of consumer policy, that is, consumer empowerment, smart homes and networks, as well as data management and protection. The empowerment of consumers in particular poses three challenges, namely, (1) how to motivate them to increase demand-side flexibility and (2) improve energy efficiency while (3) reducing energy poverty—a structural challenge in the energy transition not limited to the European Union. Carefully calibrated policy action is required if the “consumer at the heart of the energy markets” is not to remain an empty slogan. As this chapter will argue, consumer ownership can contribute to meet each of the mentioned challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Energy Union Framework Strategy COM (2015) 80 final.

  2. 2.

    Referring to Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co., United States Supreme Court Reports, Vol. 157, 1895, p. 429ff: “For what is the land but the profits thereof? … A devise of the rents and profits or of the income of lands passes the land itself both at law and in equity”.

  3. 3.

    “[P]roperty performs the function of maintaining independence, dignity and pluralism in society by creating zones within which the majority has to yield to the owner. Whim, caprice, irrational and ‘antisocial’ activities are given the protection of law….”

  4. 4.

    As legal entity it benefits of an important privilege, the limitation of the personal liability of its shareholders to the amount of the fully paid share. In the sixteenth century, this privilege used to be granted under the condition that the purpose of the enterprise served the common good; thus in the majority of corporations, shareholders were personally liable for the debt of the corporation; but in the nineteenth century, the privilege of limited liability became ubiquitous, a structural change with unanticipated impact.

  5. 5.

    The BRP is the entity taking financial responsibility vis-à-vis the Transmission System Operator (TSO) for possible imbalances in its contractual portfolio, that is, between, on the one side, all consumers and sales and, on the other side, all generation and purchases contractually included in its portfolio. In the summer of 2018 balancing responsibilities were still being negotiated under the Electricity Internal Market regulation and directive at the EU level.

  6. 6.

    Also known as ratepayer or customer-supported energy efficiency investments; see http://emp.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/lbnl-5803e-brief.pdf.

  7. 7.

    The EC distinguishes energy poverty as including electricity and gas only, while fuel poverty includes other energy sources. For some countries, esp. in CEE with a high share of population using coal, wood for heating fuel poverty captures the problem better.

  8. 8.

    See http://www.genanet.de/: A Powerful Connection: Gender & Renewables. Gender Perspectives in Industralised Countries; details on the gender pay gap: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Gender_pay_gap_statistics; both accessed 5 May 2017.

References

  • ACA. (2016). 3er Estudio Pobreza Energética en España—Nuevos Enfoques de Análisis, Aso-ciación de Ciencias Ambientales. Disponible en https://www.cienciasambientales.org.es/index.php/comunicacion/noticias/567-3er-estudio-pobreza-energetica-en-espana-nuevos-enfoques-deanalisis.

  • AGORA. (2014). Impulse penta market design 2014 (p. 24 f). Baltimore, MD: AGORA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauwens, T., & Eyre, N. (2017). Exploring the links between community-based governance and sustainable energy use: Quantitative evidence from Flanders. Ecological Economics, 137, 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BEIS. (2017). Annual Fuel Poverty Statistics Report 2017. London: BEIS. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/639118/Fuel_Poverty_Statistics_Report_2017_revised_August.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryce, R. (2015). California’s energy policies: The poor are hit hardest. National Review. Retrieved from https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/08/california-energy-policies-hurt-poor/.

  • Canadian Housing for Renewal Association. (2005). Affordable & efficient: Towards a nation-al energy efficiency strategy for low-income Canadians. Retrieved from http://www.lowincomeenergy.ca/wpcontent/uploads/2008/12/affeff.pdf.

  • Carvalho Natalino, M. A. (2016). Estimativa da População em Situação de Rua no Brasil. TD 2246. Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada. Brasília.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENERGY ATLAS. (2018). Energy Atlas 2018—Facts and figures about renewables in Europe. Heinrich Böll Foundation, Friends of the Earth Europe, European Renewable Energies Federation, and Green European Foundation Berlin, Brussels, and Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enzensberger, N., Fichtner, W., & Rentz, O. (2003). Financing renewable energy projects via closed-end funds—A German case study. Renewable Energy, 28(13), 2023–2036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2016). Selecting indicators to measure energy poverty. DG Energy. Trinomics.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Energy Agency. (2013). Achieving energy efficiency through behaviour change: What does it take? Technical Report 5/2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Institute for Gender Equality. (2012). Review of the Implementation in the EU of area K of the Beijing Platform for Action: Women and the Environment. Gender Equality and Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU-SILC. (2016). European union statistics on income and living conditions 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, A. (1788). The Federalist Papers Nr. 73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinsohn, G., & Steiger, O. (1997, July). The paradigm of property, interest and money and its application to European economic problems: Mass unemployment, monetary union and transformation. IKSF Discussion Paper No. 10, p. 346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, J. (2012). Getting the measure of fuel poverty: Final Report of the Fuel Poverty Review. London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, Report 72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstenkamp, L., Centgraf, S., Dorniok, D., Kahla, F., Masson, T., Müller, J. R., Radtke, J., & Yildiz, Ö. (2017). Bürgerenergiegesellschaften in Deutschland. In L. Holstenkamp & J. Radtke (Eds.), Handbuch Energiewende und Partizipation (pp. 1057–1076). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölscher, J. (1996). Privatisierung und Privateigentum, Bedingungen ökonomischer Entwicklung in Zentralosteuropa (Vol. 4, p. 109). Marburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelso, L. O., & Adler, M. J. (1958). The Capitalist Manifesto. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laitner, J. A., McDonnell, M. T., Ehrhardt-Martinez, K. (2013, January). Consumer engagement programs and smart energy efficiency strategies for our nation’s electric utilities. Working paper prepared for the Garrison Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAZARD. (2014, September). Levelized cost of energy analysis. Version 8.0. Retrieved from http://www.lazard.com/PDF/Levelized%20Cost%20of%20Energy%20-%20Version%208.0.pdf.

  • Lis, M., Miazga, A., Salach, K., Szpor, A., & Swiecicka, K. (2016). Ubóstwo energetyczne w Polsce—diagnoza i rekomendacje. Policy Brief. Warsaw: Institute for Structural Research (ISB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowitzsch, J., Roggemann, H., & Suarsana, D. (2015, Juni). Rechtliche Verankerung eines eigentumsrechtlich ausgestalteten Externalisierungsverbots [Legal rationale for a ban on externalisation]. In Nachhaltigkeit im Wettbewerb verankern, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, WISO Diskurs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood, R., & Shah, A. (2017). Deprivation counts: An assessment of energy poverty in Pakistan. The Lahore Journal of Economics, 1, 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES). (2013). Nihon ni okeru enerugi hinkon no yôinbunseki to enerugi hinkonsettai ni hairyô-shita enerugi kankyôseisaku no teir-yôhyôka (Factor analysis of energy poverty in Japan and quantitative evaluation of energy and environmental policies to accommodate energy poverty of households), Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nierop, S. (2014). Energy poverty in Denmark? EU Fuel Poverty Network. Retrieved from http://fuelpoverty.eu/2014/07/02/energy-poverty-indenmark/.

  • Pachauri, S., Mueller, A., Kemmler, A., & Spring, D. (2004). On measuring energy poverty in Indian household. World Development, 32(12), 2083–2104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pye, S., Dobbins A., et al. (2015). Energy poverty and vulnerable consumers in the energy sector across the EU: analysis of policies and measures. INSIGHT_E Observatory. Retrieved May 5, 2017, from http://www.insightenergy.org/static_pages/publications#?publication=15.

  • Reich, C. A. (1964). The New Property. Yale Law Journal, 73(5), 733–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roggemann, H. (1997). Funktionswandel des Eigentums in Ost und West—vergleichende Anmerkungen zur postsozialistischen Transformation in Ost- und Westeuropa. Recht in Ost und West, 6, 7, 194 f, 225 f.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggemann, H. (2010). Mitarbeiterbeteiligung und Eigentum (pp. 64 ff, 69). Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rommel, J., Radtke, J., von Jorck, G., Mey, F., & Yildiz, Ö. (2018). Community renewable energy at a crossroads: A think piece on degrowth, technology, and the democratization of the German energy system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(Part 2), 1746–1753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, L., Lowitzsch, J., Yildiz, Ö., & Hashani, A. (2018). Does (Co-) ownership in renewables matter for an electricity consumer’s demand flexibility? Empirical evidence from Germany. Energy Research & Social Science, 46, 169-182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Government. (2015). Scottish house condition survey: 2014 key findings. Retrieved from http://www.gov.scot/Publications/2015/12/8460/downloads.

  • Straver, K., Siebinga, A., Mastop, J., De Lidth, M., Vethman, P., & Uyterlinde, M. (2017). Rapportage Energiearmoede. Effectieve interventies om energie efficiëntie te ver-groten en energiearmoede te verlagen. Retrieved from https://www.ecn.nl/publicaties/PdfFetch.aspx?nr=ECNE%2D%2D17-002.

  • Trinomics. (2016). Selecting indicators to measure energy poverty. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1WFZfLP.

  • The Kelso Institute. (1976, November). Documentation “Valley Nitrogen Producers, Inc.”.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Supreme Court. (1895). Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co (Vol. 157, p. 429ff). United States Supreme Court Reports.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens Lowitzsch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lowitzsch, J. (2019). The Consumer at the Heart of the Energy Markets?. In: Lowitzsch, J. (eds) Energy Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93518-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93518-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93517-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93518-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics