Skip to main content

Sociology of Work in Bulgaria

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of the Sociology of Work in Europe

Abstract

Before WW II, there were few sociological texts addressing work in Bulgaria. After 1945, teaching and research activities in the field were prohibited. In the 1960s, sociology was ‘rehabilitated’ and work-related research began to develop. The sub-discipline was institutionalized at the end of the 1960s. Following the fall of communism, interest in the SoW began to wane, in preference to research on the new political system, the emerging civil society, entrepreneurship, social and ethnic minorities, and on poverty. Work-related research has been developing principally in the context of foreign donors who have imposed their research agenda. In the last two decades, the main focus of the sub-discipline has been on privatization, new forms of organization, human resource management and post-communist industrial relations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the same time there are other research traditions that are also very important, but not examined here, because of their very distant relationship with the world of work: the science and technology studies (STS)—Ivan Tchalakov and the group around him; the research on poverty and unemployment of D. Minev and M. Jeliazkova among others; the research on the agriculture and the transformation of the Bulgarian village—V. Kozhuharova and later R. Jeleva, M. Draganova, S. Stoeva; the studies on particular ethnic minorities, e.g. Romas—I. Tomova, A. Pamporov; the studies on social stratification and the middle class in Bulgaria—N. Tilkidzhiev; entrepreneurship—J. Vladimirov, and so on.

  2. 2.

    Such as the National Strategy for the Development of Scientific Research in Bulgaria 2017–2030 (Национална стратегия за развитие на научните изследвания в Република България 2017–2030) or the Fund Scientific Research (https://www.fni.bg/?q=node/14) of the Ministry of Education and Science.

  3. 3.

    A number of sociologists were persecuted because of their ideological orientation.

  4. 4.

    The Bulgarian Academy of Sciences is the national research centre, including dozens of institutes in different scientific disciplines.

  5. 5.

    The sociological survey “Gradat i seloto” (The City and the village) was carried out in 1967 and then in 1986. It was based on a very large sample (e.g. 18,994 respondents in 1967) and among other things, it provided interesting insights into the working population, the use of technology, educational status and so forth (http://prehod.omda.bg/page.php?IDMenu=819&IDLang=1 http://prehod.omda.bg/page.php?IDMenu=620&IDLang=1).

  6. 6.

    Interestingly, there were a number of famous sociologists who had acquired high-profile positions: e.g. Stoyan Mihailov was a member of the Central Committee of BKP, Niko Yahiel was a political advisor to T. Zhivkov, head of BKP from 1954 to 1989.

  7. 7.

    http://www.bsa-bg.org/index.php/2012-05-21-15-04-57.

  8. 8.

    For more details, see http://www.old-sociology.issk-bas.org/display.php?page=section&type=30&article=119.

  9. 9.

    More details about this survey in Elprom can be found at http://assa-m.com/npechat_st57.php#7.

  10. 10.

    See the interesting thematic issue concerning enterprise sociologists in Sotziologuitcheski problemi, 1988, Sofia or Stoyanov, S. Roliata na empiricthnite sotziologuitcheski izsledvania v promichlenia kombinat. in Sotzialna efektivnost na empirichnite sotziologuitcheski izsledvania. Izdatelstvo Naouka i izkoustvo (Gueorgiev, I., Fotev, G., Tchakalov, B. Eds.), Sofia: 1988, pp. 294–301, 331 p., Karagiaourova, D. Sotziologuitcheski prouchvania v edno promichleno predpriatie. in Sotzialna efektivnost na empirichnite sotziologuitcheski izsledvania. Izdatelstvo Naouka i izkoustvo (Gueorgiev, I., Fotev, G., Thcakalov, B. sous la dir.), Sofia: 1988, pp. 278–280.

  11. 11.

    At the beginning of the 1990s, those sociologists were among the first to be made redundant in the framework of the mass dismissals. However, in few companies, sociologists were active even in the second half of the 1990s—e.g. in my own research, I was able to meet the sociologist of the National Electric Company and the sociologist working in the Nuclear Plant “Kozlodouy” in 1995.

  12. 12.

    http://epicenter.bg/article/Tri-dni-predi-da-go-ubiyat-Lukanov-prizna-che-se-strahuva-za-zhivota-si/63968/11/34.

  13. 13.

    Some of these movements started within the dissident groups from 1988 and early 1989.

  14. 14.

    Actually, a number of famous sociologists were engaged in the newly established political movements, NGOs, trade unions and so on. It is interesting to note the largest Bulgarian opposition movement, the Union of the Democratic Forces, was established in the basement of the Institute of Sociology on 10 December 1989. Some of the significant sociologists of work also were engaged in political, trade union or civic activity: Krastiu Petkov became the founder and president of the reformed trade union CITUB (1990–1997) and later established the labour party the Obedinen blok na truda, Tchavdar Kuranov, after being active in the dissident movement, became candidate for President in 1990, supported by the Bulgarian Socialist Party (the new name of BKP since 1990) and so on.

  15. 15.

    As Koleva (2013) notes: “The economic transformation of Bulgarian society was favourable to the emergence of a new group of actors, willing to financially support both fundamental and applied research, regardless of the institutional affiliation of the researchers. In the first ten years of the transition, the Research Support Scheme of the Open Society Foundation made possible several hundred collective and individual projects of Bulgarian researchers in the social sciences, including sociologists. A positive contribution in this respect was also made by internationally reputed foundations such as Friedrich Naumann, Friedrich Ebert, Kondrad Adenauer, MacArthur, King Baudouin, by foreign and international funds like Fonds Marshall, the PHARE program, UNDP, the programmes for scientific cooperation of the ministries of foreign affairs of Western countries. Since the late 1990s the EU framework programmes have enabled the participation of Bulgarian scholars in European projects.”

  16. 16.

    See more details at http://phls.uni-sofia.bg/documents/users/44/MP%20Trudovi%20pazari/Report_15.pdf.

  17. 17.

    This research was part of the European comparative research project WORKS—Work Organisation and Restructuring in the Knowledge Society (2005–2009).

  18. 18.

    See bio available at http://www.kpetkov.eu/avtobiografia.

  19. 19.

    Among these projects, I would like to mention WALQING—Work and Life Quality in New and Growing Jobs (2009–2012); WORKS—Work Organisation and Restructuring in the Knowledge Society (2005–2009); “SMALL”—Representation and voice in Small and Medium-sized European enterprises: monitoring Actors, Labour organisations and Legal frameworks (2002–2006), but also various projects financed by DG Employment of the European Commission and other donors.

  20. 20.

    According to Avramov (2007), the results of a study based on interviews with Bulgarian economists and sociologists, assessed the transfer of ideas from West to East. The research led to the conclusion that the Bulgarian economic research community had a propensity to confine itself to the role of recipient of theory.

  21. 21.

    Avramov (2007).

References

  • Avramov, R. (2007). Знaниe зa инcтитyциитe, инcтитyции нa знaниeтo. Sociologitcheski Problemi, 3–4, 15–41 (in Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyadjieva, P. (2009). Shooting at a Moving Target: Rediscovering Sociology in Bulgaria. In The ISA Handbook of Diverse Sociological Traditions (pp. 163–174). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavdarova, T. (2001). Neformalnata ikonomika [The Informal Economy]. Sofia: Lik (in Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavdarova, T. (2002). The Informal Economy in Bulgaria: Historical Background and Present Situation. In The Social Impact of Informal Economics in Eastern Europe (pp. 56–76). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chengelova, E. (2015). Has The Relative Share of Shadow Economy in Bulgaria Been Reduced: Labour Force Evaluations. Ikonomiceski i Sotsialni Alternativi, 3, 26–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daskalova, N., & Tomev, L. (2010). Sociétés multinationales en Bulgarie: l’impact sur l’évolution du travail et du climat social. In V. Schmidt (Ed.), Les syndicats face aux défis de la mondialisation (pp. 73–84). Bureau international du travail; Réseau international de recherches syndicales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delteil, V., & Kirov, V. (Eds.). (2016). Labour and Social Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe: Europeanization and Beyond. Abingdon, UK and New York, USA: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deyanova, L. (2008). Le nouveau paradigme des sciences sociales vu de l’Est. Regards sociologiques, 36, 69–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrova, D., & Vilrokx, J. (Eds.). (2005). Trade Unions Strategies in Central and Eastern Europe: Towards Decent Work. Budapest: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimova, L. (1989). Rabotchee obshtestvenoe mnenie v seredina 80 godov [Public Opinion of Workers in the Mid-1980s], (in Russian), Synthesis report, Sofia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dontchev, S. (1988). Sotziologuitcheski izsledvania na promichlenia troud [Sociological Research on Industrial Work]. Sofia: Izdatelstvo na BAN (in Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drahokoupil, J., Kirov, V., Muntean, A., & Radu, E. (2017). Chinese Investment in Romania and Bulgaria. In J. Drahokoupil (Ed.), Chinese Investment in Europe: Corporate Strategies and Labour Relations (pp. 141–154). Brussels: ETUI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, P. (1989). L’universel, le national et le cas de figure: A propos de comparaisons avec des pays d’Europe de l’Est. Sociologie du Travail, 31(2), 205–216 (Les comparaisons internationales: Théories et méthodes).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, P., Durand, C., & Gilain, C. (1986). La prise de décisions dans l’industrie - Etude comparative, France-Bulgarie-Hongrie. Paris: Groupe de Sociologie du Travail, Tome I, 345 p., Tome II, 190 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entziklopedichen Rechnik po sotziologia. (1996). S. Mihaylov (Ed.). Sofia: Institut po soziologia (in Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerov, K. (1984). Organizatzionni strukturi i upravlenie [Organisational Structures and Management]. Varna: Knigoizdatelstvo “G. Bakalov” (in Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, S., Martin, R., & Vidinova, A. (1997). Institutional Theory and Economic Transformation: Enterprise Employment Relations in Bulgaria. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 3(2), 229–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illessy, M., Mako, C., Kirov, V., & Stoeva, S. (2007). Labour Relations, Collective Bargaining and Employee Voice in SMEs in Central and Eastern Europe. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 13(1), 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keremidtchiev, M. (1995). Les privatisations en Bulgarie: mécanismes et intérêts. REVUE FRANCAISE D ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE: n° 74 (avril–juin), 211–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirov, V. (2001). La privatisation des entreprises bulgares: de la contrainte exogène à l’adaptation locale. In Communisme, Numéro spécial ‘Communisme et post-communisme en Europe centrale et orientale’. n° 64, 143–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirov, V. (2002). La privatisation des entreprises en Bulgarie. Thèse de doctorat en Sociologie. Soutenue en 2002 à Paris, Institut d’études politiques.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirov, V. (2005). Restructurations industrielles en Bulgarie: Strategie des acteurs dans le contexte de l’integration Europeenne. In M. Alaluf & E. Krzeslo (Eds.), Protection sociale et emploi. Regards croises sur la mondialisation en Europe et en Chine (pp. 167–184). Bruxelles: Editions de l’ULB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirov, V., Markova, E., & Peycheva, D. (2013). Action Research: An Example of Adapting and Applying Active Sociological Surveying in Bulgaria. Sotziologuitcheski problemi [Sociological Problems], (1–2), pp. 67–90 (in Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirov, V., Markova, E., & Peycheva, D. (2014). Forced Flexibility and Job Insecurity. Sociological Analysis of the Quality of Labor in the Construction and Waste Disposal in Bulgaria. Sofia: East-West Publishing House (in Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirov, V., Markova, E., & Peycheva, D. (2016). Hybrid Work Organisation in the Construction Sector in Bulgaria: Employees or Sub-contractors? EMECON Employment and Economy and Central and Eastern Europe, 1. (http://www.emecon.eu/fileadmin/articles/1_2016/Kirov_et%20al_2016.pdf).

  • Koleva, S. (2005). Coциoлoгиятa кaтo пpoeкт: нayчнa идeнтичнocти и coциaлни изпитaния в Бългapия, 1945–1989 гoдинa [Sociology as a Scientific Project: Scientific Identity and Social Hardship]. Sofia: Pensoft Publishers. (in Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koleva, S. (2011). La sociologie en Bulgarie des années 1945 à 2010: une trajectoire disciplinaire à l’épreuve de l’histoire, Sociologies pratiques, 2011/2 (n° 23), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.3917/sopr.023.0127. http://www.cairn.info/revue-sociologies-pratiques-2011-2-page-127.htm.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koleva, S. (2013). Sociology in Bulgaria and Its Predicaments: Facing Scientific and Social Challenges Throughout History, Third ISA National Associations Conference, Ankara. http://www.bsa-bg.org/index.php/en/isa-forums/54-third-isa-conference-2/64-sociology-in-bulgaria-and-its-predicaments. Accessed 2 June 2017.

  • Kuranov, T. (1988). Pъчният тpyд. Sofia: BAN (in Bulgarian) (The manual work).

    Google Scholar 

  • Makó, C., Illéssy, M., Csizmadia, P., Kirov, V., & Galev, T. (2009). Changes in Work in Transformation Economies—The Case of the New Member States. Leuven: HIVA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meil, P., & Kirov, V. (2017). Introduction: The Policy Implications of Virtual Work. In P. Meil & V. Kirov (Eds.), Policy Implications of Virtual Work. Palgrave: Basingstoke.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Michailov, S. (2003). Sociologijata v Balgarija sled Vtorata Svetovna Vojna (Sociology in Bulgaria after World War II). Sofia: Izdatelstvo M-8-M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihaylov, S. (Ed.). (1965). Promichlenoto predpriatie – sotziologuitcheska sistema i trudova aktivnost [The Industrial Enterprise—Sociological System and Work Activity]. Sofia (in Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Minev, D., Jeliazkova, M., & Dernendjieva, B. (1995). Macoвaтa бeзpaбoтицa пpи тpaнcфopмиpaнe нa икoнoмикaтa [The Mass Unemployment During the Transformation of the Economy]. Sofia (in Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Minev, D., & Kabacktchieva, P. (1996). Prehodat – eliti i strateguii [The Transition: Elites and Strategies]. Sofia (in Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickolov, L. (1992). Sociologists in Bulgaria Today. International Sociology, 7(1), 99–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petkov, K., & Spenner, K. (1991). Menidjarite i posleditzite ot technologuichnata promiana – shodstvoto mejdu Iztoka i Zapada [The Managers and the Consequences of the Technological Change—The Similarities Between the East and the West]. Sotziologuitcheski problemi, n° 1, 3–17 (in Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Petkov, K., & Thirkell, J. (1988). Managerial Elections in Bulgaria: Interests, Conflicts, and Representation. Labor and Society, 13(3), 306–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petkov, K., & Thirkell, J. (1991). Labour Relations in Eastern Europe. Organisational Design and Dynamics (Social Analysis). London and New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Slavova, P. (2006). Professional Interest Groups and Their Impact on Regulation: The Law on the Architects’ Chamber in Bulgaria. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 7(2), 204–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slavova, P. (2014). La sociologie universitaire bulgare en transformation. Revue d’études comparatives Est-Ouest, 45, 91–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standing, G. et al. (1993). Labour Market and Reforms in the Bulgarian Industry. Sofia: ILO (in Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanojevic, M., & Gradev, G. (2003). Workers’ Representation at Company Level in CEE Countries. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 9(1), 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavrov, B. (1979). Bourgeoaznata sotziologia v Balgaria mejdu dvete svetovni voyni [The Bourgeois Sociology in Bulgaria Between the Two World Wars]. Sofia: BAN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanova, M., Haralampiev, K., Tomova, T., Kalfova, E., Neykov, I., Gospodinova, Z., Petrova, P., & Dimitrov, I. (2012). Report. National Working Conditions Survey Bulgaria. Sofia (in Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoilova, R. 2008. Impact of Gender on the Occupational Group of Software Producers in Bulgaria. In R. Stoilova & V. Kirov (Eds.), Changes of Work and Knowledge-Based Society. Sociological Problems, Special Issue, 94–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoyanov, S. (1988). Roliata na empiricthnite sotziologuitcheski izsledvania v promichlenia kombinat [The Role of the Sociological Research in the Industrial Combinat]. In I. Gueorgiev, G. Fotev, & B. Tchakalov (Eds.), Sotzialna efektivnost na empirichnite sotziologuitcheski izsledvania [Social Effectiveness of the Empirical Sociological Surveys) (pp. 294–301). Sofia: Izdatelstvo Naouka i izkoustvo (in Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzeneva, E., & Cook, N. (1991). The Dismissals in Bulgaria. According to the Research in a Company in Haskovo. Sotsiologicheski Problemi [Sociological Problems] 4, 43–54 (in Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vladimirov, Z. (2011). MNCs and the Transformation of Bulgarian Employment Relations. In S. Contrepois, V. Delteil, P. Dieuaide, & S. Jefferys, S. (Eds.), Globalizing Employment Relations (pp. 150–164). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vladimirov, J., Todorov, T., Katzarski, I., & Badjakov, M. (1999). Bulgaria in the Circle of Anomie. In P. Atteslander, B. Gransow, & J. Western (Eds.), Comparative Anomie Research. Hidden Barriers—Hidden Potential for Social Development (pp. 47–72). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yordanova, G., & Kirov, V. (2017). The work-life balance in the ICT sector in Bulgaria: The role of virtual work, non-published research report for the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (Contr. № ДФНП-155/12.05.2016) (in Bulgarian).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank my colleague Svetla Koleva for the valuable discussion about the Bulgarian SoW and her useful suggestions. Also my gratitude to Pepka Boyadjieva, who provided precious comments on the chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kirov, V. (2019). Sociology of Work in Bulgaria. In: Stewart, P., Durand, JP., Richea, MM. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the Sociology of Work in Europe . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93206-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93206-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-93205-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-93206-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics