Skip to main content

Does PDO/PGI Labels Contribute to Consumers’ Intention to Buy Premium Private Labels Products? An Empirical Survey

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 890 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Abstract

The paper focuses on a specific Premium Private Label (PPL), featured by a double branding: the retailer premium brand and the Protected Designation of Origin (PDO)/Protected Geographic Indication (PGI) label. Specifically, the study investigates if the use of an EU quality label might contribute in enhancing the intention to buy the PPL (PPLINTB), through the mediating role of PPL perceived quality (PPLQ) and attitude towards PPL products (PPLATT). The paper contributes to the literature on store brands and quality labels giving empirical evidence to the positive impact of EU quality labels on the PPL. The role of PDO/PGI labels is evaluated through three constructs: the brand guarantee they offer (PDO/PGILG), their role as products supporting the local economy (ES), their perception as authentic local products (AUT).

A survey was performed on a sample of retail customers. Our hypotheses were confirmed applying SEM, apart from the impact of AUT. PPLQ resulted as the main antecedent of PPLATT, followed by the PDO/PGI label guarantee (PDO/PGILG). PPLQ, ES and PPLATT mediate the indirect effects of the PDO/PGI labels on the PPLINT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaniotakis, I. E., Lymperopoulos, C., & Soureli, M. (2010). Consumers’ intentions of buying own-label premium food products. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 19(5), 327–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DelVecchio, D. (2001). Consumer perceptions of private label quality: The role of product category characteristics and consumer use of heuristics. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 8, 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotopoulos, C., & Krystallis, A. (2003). Quality labels as a marketing advantage. The case of the “PDO Zagora” apples in the Greek market. European Journal of Marketing, 37(10), 1350–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garretson, J. A., Fisher, D., & Burton, S. (2002). Antecedents of private label attitude and national brand promotion attitude: Similarities and differences. Journal of Retailing, 78(2), 91–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyskens, I., Gielens, K., & Gijsbrechts, E. (2010). Proliferating private-label portfolios: How introducing economy and premium private labels influences brand choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(5), 791–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, D., Krishnan, R., Baker, J., & Borin, N. (1998). The effect of store name, brand name and price discounts on consumers’ evaluations and purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 74(3), 331–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grunert, K. G., & Aachmann, K. (2016). Consumer reactions to the use of EU quality labels on food products: A review of the literature. Food Control, 59, 178–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., & Huddleston, P. (2009). Retailer premium own-brands: creating customer loyalty through own-brand products advantage. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 37(11), 975–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IGD. (2017). Global retail trend predictions for 2018. Accessed January 15, 2018 from https://www.igd.com/about-us/media/press-releases/press-release/t/igd-unveils-global-retail-trend-predictions-for-2018/i/18009

  • IRI. (2016, June). Private label in western economies, Special Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamey, L., Deleersnyder, B., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Dekimpe, M. J. (2012). The effect of business-cycle fluctuations on private-label share: What has marketing conduct got to do with it? Journal of Marketing, 76(January), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli, E., Belli, A., & Marchi, G. (2015). The role of customer loyalty as a brand extension purchase predictor. International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 25, 105–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J.-B., & van Trijp, H. (1991). The use of lisrel in validating marketing constructs. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 8(4), 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steenkamp, J. B. E. M., Van Heerde, H., & Geyskens, I. (2010). What makes consumers willing to pay a price premium for national brands over private labels? Journal of Marketing Research, 47(6), 1011–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak, A., Geyskens, I., & Dekimpe, M. G. (2014). Why premium private label presence varies by category. Journal of Retailing, 90(2), 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ittersum, K., Candel, M. J. J. M., & Torelli, F. (2000). The market for PDO/PGI protected regional products: Consumer attitudes and behaviour. The socio-economics of origin labelled products in agri-food supply chains: Spatial, Institutional and Co-ordination Aspects, 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisa Martinelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Martinelli, E., De Canio, F. (2018). Does PDO/PGI Labels Contribute to Consumers’ Intention to Buy Premium Private Labels Products? An Empirical Survey. In: Martínez-López, F., Gázquez-Abad, J., Chernev, A. (eds) Advances in National Brand and Private Label Marketing. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92084-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics