Abstract
The formal evaluation of new interfaces for musical expression (NIMEs) in their use by ensembles of musicians is a challenging problem in human-computer interaction (HCI). NIMEs are designed to support creative expressions that are often improvised and unexpected. In the collaborative setting of a musical ensemble, interactions are complex and it can be almost impossible to directly evaluate the impact of interface variations. The evaluation environment also needs to be carefully considered. In the wild, concert pressures and practicalities limit experimental control. In the laboratory, studies may not sufficiently reflect real-world usage to make their conclusions relevant. To address some of these issues, we propose a methodology of rehearsal-as-research to study free improvisation by ensembles of NIME performers. In this methodology, evaluation sessions are structured to mirror established practices for improvisation training and performance development. Such sessions can allow controlled, order-balanced studies with extensive data collection in the style of factorial HCI experiments while preserving the artistic setting of a rehearsal. Experiment design, questionnaires, and objective measures such as session duration will be discussed along with two case studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barbosa J, Malloch J, Wanderley M, Huot S (2015) What does ‘evaluation’ mean for the NIME community? In: Berdahl E, Allison J (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, pp 156–161
Bin SMA, Morreale F, Bryan-Kinns N, McPherson AP (2017) In-the-moment and beyond: Combining post-hoc and real-time data for the study of audience perception of electronic music performance. In: Bernhaupt R, Dalvi G, Joshi A, Balkrishan DK, O’Neill J, Winckler M (eds) Human-computer interaction—INTERACT 2017. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67744-6_18
Bradley JV (1958) Complete counterbalancing of immediate sequential effects in a Latin square design. J Am Stat Assoc 53:525–528. https://doi.org/10.2307/2281872
Cahn WL (2005) Creative music making. Routledge, New York, NY
Corbin J, Strauss A (2008) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications, London
Costello B, Muller L, Amitani S, Edmonds E (2005) Understanding the experience of interactive art: Iamascope in Betaspace. In: Proceedings of the second Australasian conference on interactive entertainment. Creativity & Cognition Studios Press, Sydney, pp 49–56
Csikszentmihalyi M (1991) Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper Collins, New York, NY
Eisenberg J, Thompson WF (2003) A matter of taste: Evaluating improvised music. Creat Res J 15:287–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2003.9651421
Fiebrink R, Cook PR, Trueman D (2011) Human model evaluation in interactive supervised learning. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, pp 147–156. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978965
Gardner HJ, Martin MA (2007) Analyzing ordinal scales in studies of virtual environments: Likert or lump it! Presence: Teleoper Virtual Environ 16:439–446. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.16.4.439
Gelineck S, Serafin S (2012) Longitudinal evaluation of the integration of digital musical instruments into existing compositional work processes. J New Music Res 41:259–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/09298215.2012.697174
Gurevich M, Marquez-Borbon A, Stapleton P (2012) Playing with constraints: stylistic variation with a simple electronic instrument. Comput Music J 36:23–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/COMJ_a_00103
Hayden S, Windsor L (2007) Collaboration and the composer: case studies from the end of the 20th century. Tempo 61:28–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0040298207000113
Jordà S, Mealla S (2014) A methodological framework for teaching, evaluating and informing NIME design with a focus on mapping and expressiveness. In: Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression. Goldsmiths, University of London, London, pp 233–238
Krüger S (2008) Ethnography in the performing arts: a student guide. The Higher Education Academy, York
Lazar J, Feng J, Hochheiser H (2010) Research methods in human-computer interaction. Wiley, West Sussex
Martin C, Gardner H (2016) A percussion-focussed approach to preserving touch-screen improvisation. In: England D, Schiphorst T, Bryan-Kinns N (eds) Curating the digital: spaces for art and interaction. Springer, Cham, pp 51–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28722-5_5
Martin C, Gardner H, Swift B (2014) Exploring percussive gesture on iPads with Ensemble Metatone. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, pp 1025–1028. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557226
Martin C, Gardner H, Swift B, Martin M (2015) Music of 18 performances: evaluating apps and agents with free improvisation. In: Stevenson I (ed) Proceedings of the Australasian computer music conference. Australasian Computer Music Association, Fitzroy, pp 85–94
Martin C, Gardner H, Swift B, Martin M (2016) Intelligent agents and networked buttons improve free-improvised ensemble music-making on touch-screens. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, pp 2295–2306. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858269
Neustaedter C, Sengers P (2012) Autobiographical design in HCI research: Designing and learning through use-it-yourself. In: Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference. ACM, New York, NY, pp 514–523. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318034
O’Modhrain S (2011) A framework for the evaluation of digital musical instruments. Comput Music J 35:28–42. https://doi.org/10.1162/COMJ_a_00038
Shneiderman B (2007) Creativity support tools: accelerating discovery and innovation. Commun ACM 50:20–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/1323688.1323689
Skogstad SA, Nymoen K, Høvin M (2011) Comparing inertial and optical MoCap technologies for synthesis control. In: Proceedings of the 8th sound and music computing conference. SMC Network, Barcelona
Smith DT (2009) Development and validation of a rating scale for wind jazz improvisation performance. J Res Music Educ 57:217–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429409343549
Stowell D, Robertson A, Bryan-Kinns N, Plumbley MD (2009) Evaluation of live human-computer music-making: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Int J Hum Comput Stud 67:960–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.05.007
Unander-Scharin C, Unander-Scharin Å, Höök K (2014) The Vocal Chorder: empowering opera singers with a large interactive instrument. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, pp 1001–1010. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557050
Wanderley MM, Orio N (2002) Evaluation of input devices for musical expression: borrowing tools from HCI. Comput Music J 26:62–76. https://doi.org/10.1162/014892602320582981
Williams EJ (1949) Experimental designs balanced for the estimation of residual effects of treatments. Aust J Chem 2:149–168. https://doi.org/10.1071/CH9490149
Wobbrock JO, Findlater L, Gergle D, Higgins JJ (2011) The aligned rank transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only ANOVA procedures. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, pp 143–146. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1978963
Wobbrock JO, Kay M (2016) Nonparametric statistics in human-computer interaction. In: Robertson J, Kaptein M (eds) Modern statistical methods for HCI. Springer, Cham, pp 135–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26633-6_7
Xambó A, Hornecker E, Marshall P et al (2013) Let’s jam the reactable: peer learning during musical improvisation with a tabletop tangible interface. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact 20:36:1–36:34. https://doi.org/10.1145/2530541
Acknowledgements
We thank Ben Swift, Michael Martin, and our study participants for assistance with the case studies listed in this chapter. Special thanks to Alec Hunter, the Canberra Experimental Music Studio, and the ANU Schools of Music and Art for support in the artistic goals of this research. This work was partially supported by The Research Council of Norway as a part of the Engineering Predictability with Embodied Cognition (EPEC) project, under grant agreement 240862.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martin, C.P., Gardner, H. (2019). Free-Improvised Rehearsal-as-Research for Musical HCI. In: Holland, S., Mudd, T., Wilkie-McKenna, K., McPherson, A., Wanderley, M. (eds) New Directions in Music and Human-Computer Interaction. Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92069-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92069-6_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-92068-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-92069-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)