Abstract
In 1950–1960 nuclear magnetic resonance was the most acceptable method of study of configuration of chemical structure of substances and reactive processes. In 1973 Lauterbach performed the first magnetic resonance study. Since 1983, the development of magnetic resonance equipment and its software later gave a possibility to the investigators to receive a high contrast image of 1 mm slice within several seconds.
✠ Fridon Todua was deceased at the time of publication.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Castellano R et al (2005) Carotid artery stenosis: intraindividual correlations of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography, contrast-enhanced MR angiography, conventional DSA, and rotational angiography for detection and grading. Radiology 236:204–213
Belichenko OI (1998) Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease.Belichenko OI, Dadvapi SA, Abramova NN, Ternovoi SK. Vidar. 111 p.
Bradlay WG (1988) Flow phenomena in MR imaging. AJR 150:983
Debrey SM, Baird AE, Yu H, Lynch JK et al (2008) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for internal carotid artery disease a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 39:2237–2248
Hartung MP, Grist TM, Francois CJ (2011) Magnetic resonance angiography: current status and future directions. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13:19
Heisermann JE, Drager B, Fram E et al (1992) Carotid artery stenosis: clinical efficacy of two-dimensional time-of 1-flight MR angiography. Radiology 182:761–768
Link J, Steffens J, Graessner J, Heller M (1999) MR angiography of the carotid arteries from the aortic arch to the circle of Willis. Radiology 211(p):460
Lohan DG, Barkhordarian F, Saleh R, Krishnam M (2007) MR angiography at 3 T for assessment of the external carotid artery system. Am J Roentgenol 189:1088–1094
Magarelli N, Saarabino T, Simeoni A et al (2000) Carotid stenosis: a comparison between MR angiography and CT angiography. Radiology 218(p):135
Neumann-Haefelin T, Moseley M et al (2000) New magnetic resonance imaging methods for cerebrovascular disease: emerging clinical applications. Ann Neurol 31:559–570
Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, Chiras J, Dormont D, Marsault C (2003) Proximal great vessels of aortic arch: comparison of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 229:697–702
Runck F, Steiner P, Bautz WA, Lell MM (2008) MR imaging: influence of imaging technique and postprocessing on measurement of internal carotid artery stenosis. Am J Neuroradiol 29(9):1736–1742
Sinitsin V (1995) MRT in of heart and vessel diseases. Assay Doctor Science Degree Moscow. (In Russian)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Todua, F., Gachechiladze, D. (2018). Physical Principles of Magnetic Resonance and Magnetic Resonance Angiography. In: Noninvasive Radiologic Diagnosis of Extracranial Vascular Pathologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91367-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91367-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91366-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91367-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)