Abstract
Results were presented and included the following categories case type (acts included beating, shooting, burning, kicking, punching, etc.). The 259 offenders commit active animal cruelty acts against 495 animal victims. Breaking down the affective and predatory violence, the sample comprises 33.5% affective violence and 59% predatory violence. The majority are Caucasian (78.8%) and the median age was 34 years. The other findings include education level. Marital status, household composition, children, employment status, mental health and substance use, and/or abuse history.
Regarding the offenders’ criminal history, 73.3% of the 213 offenders with National Crime Information Center reports were arrested for at least one offense. In addition, 88.7% had a documented criminal arrest history prior to the animal cruelty charge and 54.5% had been arrested following the animal cruelty offense, with 59.9% engaged in interpersonal violence prior to, concurrent to, and post the animal cruelty offense.
The animal victims were mostly dogs (64%) and 24% were cats. In 40%, beating was the most frequent animal cruelty act, followed by shooting (22%). Affective offenders exhibited more beating and predatory offenders exhibited more shooting acts. Instruments were used in 52.8% of the cases and 29.1% used personal weapons. Affective offenders used personal weapons while predatory instruments used sharp force instruments.
Relationship with the victim and offender in the affective group is 86% compared to 48% of predatory offenders. In addition, in 69.1% of the cases people were present during the animal cruelty incident. The top three motivations included displacement/retaliation against an animal, punishment for unwanted behaviors of the animal, and animal unwanted. Other results included offender’s claims/explanations to law enforcement, number of victims killed, cause of death, location of body disposal, and legal outcomes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In cases where no criminal history record was found in the NCIC, the authors coded these cases as indicative of an absence of a documented criminal history.
- 2.
Due to offender’s needs/wants is a category to encompass information from the investigative report that the offender committed the animal cruelty act due to a desire for physical control/power, to satisfy prejudice against a species, to experience nonspecific sadism, and due to an animal being unwanted.
The offender may have indicated they wanted the animal to die or be eliminated without further motivation.
References
Arkow, P. (1997). Relationships between animal abuse and other forms of family violence. Protecting Children, 13(2), 4–9.
Fox, B. H., & Farrington, D. P. (2012). Creating burglary profiles using latent class analysis: A new approach to offender profiling. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(12), 1582–1611.
Kellert, S. R., & Felthous, A. R. (1985). Childhood cruelty toward animals among criminals and noncriminals. Human Relations, 38(12), 1113–1129.
Lockwood, R. (2017). Factors in the assessment of dangerousness in perpetrators of animal cruelty.
Merz-Perez, L., Heide, K. M., & Silverman, I. J. (2001). Childhood cruelty to animals and subsequent violence against humans. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45(5), 556–573.
Muthén L. K., Muthén B. O. (2000). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Vaughn, M. G., DeLisi, M., Beaver, K. M., & Howard, M. O. (2009). Multiple murder and criminal careers: A latent class analysis of multiple homicide offenders. Forensic Science International, 183, 67–73.
Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2005). Latent Gold 4.0 Users Guide. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoffer, T., Hargreaves-Cormany, H., Muirhead, Y., Meloy, J.R. (2018). Results. In: Violence in Animal Cruelty Offenders. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91038-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91038-3_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91037-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91038-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)