Skip to main content

The Situational Logic of Disciplinary Scholarship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Impact of Critical Rationalism

Abstract

Ian C. Jarvie developed the idea of situational logic in a subtle and effective way. He was also interested in, as well as a contributor to, the institution of academic publication. This chapter provides a situational analysis of an important recurrent pattern in academic publishing, namely, the concentration of work around particular topics, despite the fact that most such work will be unrewarded in the economy of esteem that is meant to be in play.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott, Andrew. 1999. Department and Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. Brian. 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, Brian. 1975. The Liberal Theory of Justice: A Critical Examination of the Principal Doctrines in a Theory of Justice. The Philosophical Review 84 (4): 598–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1988. Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, Geoffrey, and Philip Pettit. 2004. The Economy of Esteem: An Essay on Civil and Political Society. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K.D., R. Mudambi, and D.M. Reeb. 2012. The Blockbuster Hypothesis: Influencing the Boundaries of Knowledge. Scientometrics 90 (3): 959–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chubin, Daryl E., and Terence Connolly. 1982. Research Trails and Science Policies. In Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies, ed. N. Elias, H. Martins, and R. Whitley. Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Gerald A. 2009. Why Not Socialism? Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Randall. 1998. The Sociology of Philosophies: A Global Theory of Intellectual Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino, Fred B. 1988. Relativism and Reflective Equilibrium. The Monist 71 (3): 420–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Free Public Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Incommensurability and Commensuration. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 32: 429–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Rational Agency. In The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences, ed. I.C. Jarvie and J. Zamora-Bonilla, 182–198. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Disciplinarity and the Growth of Knowledge. Social Epistemology 26 (3–4): 331–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Disciplines, the Division of Epistemic Labor, and Agency. In Social Epistemology and Epistemic Agency, ed. P. Reider. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, Norman, ed. 1975. Reading Rawls: Critical Studies on ‘A Theory of Justice’. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich A. 1967. The Theory of Complex Phenomena. In Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics, ed. F. Hayek. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, Kieran. 2013. A Co-Citation Network for Philosophy. https://kieranhealy.org/blog/archives/2013/06/18/a-co-citation-network-for-philosophy/.

  • Jarvie, Ian C. 1998. Situational Logic and Its Reception. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (3): 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvie, Ian C., and Fred B. D’Agostino, eds. 1989. Freedom and Rationality: Essays in Honor of John Watkins. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, Phillip. 2001. Science, Truth and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Jenny M. 2013. Academic Governance: Disciplines and Policy. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G. 1991. Exploration and Exploitation in Organization Learning. Organization Science 2: 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert K. 1968. The Matthew Effect in Science. Science 159: 3810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, Philip. 1974. A Theory of Justice? Theory and Decision 4 (3): 311–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Republicanism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Lee. 1977. The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. L. Berokowitz, vol. 10. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. 1956. Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment. Psychological Review 63 (2): 129–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning. Organization Science 2 (1): 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storer, Norman W. 1965. The Social System of Science. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1973. Introduction. In The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, ed. N. Storer. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J. 1998. Design Issues for Innovative Firms: Bureaucracy, Incentives and Industrial Structure. In The Dynamic Firm: The Role of Technology, Strategy, Organization, and Regions, ed. A. Chandler, P. Hagstrom, and O. Solvell, 134–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upham, S. Phineas, and Henry Small. 2010. Emerging Research Fronts in Science and Technology: Patterns of New Knowledge Development. Scientometrics 83 (1): 15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, Richard. 1984. The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Bryan, ed. 1970. Rationality. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Robert P. 1979. Understanding Rawls: A Reconstruction and Critique of a Theory of Justice. The Journal of Philosophy 76 (9): 496–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, Steve. 1995. Representation, Cognition, and Self: What Hope for an Integration of Psychology and Sociology? In Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology, ed. S.L. Star. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Xueguang. 2002. Organization Decision Making as Rule Following. In Organizational Decision Making, ed. Zur Shapira. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fred D’Agostino .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

D’Agostino, F. (2019). The Situational Logic of Disciplinary Scholarship. In: Sassower, R., Laor, N. (eds) The Impact of Critical Rationalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90826-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90826-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90825-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90826-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics