Skip to main content

Discussion on Erçetin’s Quantum Leadership Paradigm in Terms of the School or Classroom Management

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2017 (ICCLS 2017)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1031 Accesses

Abstract

N. Copeland says that: “Leadership is the art of being able to affect people mentally, physically, emotionally.” Management is what it means to manage people, to convince them that what you want to do is what people actually want to do. As the leader of education, it can be considered as the necessity of our time to be the “leader-manager” by providing trust, open communication, and effective communication between the school administrator and the staff and the environment. In this study, firstly, from the classical physics theory which advocates the linearity that Newton put forward by the movement of quantum theory in physics, the quantum physics theory of the scientists such as Planck, Einstein, and Broglie has brought about our everyday life, our relationships, and ourselves. It has been emphasized that it has proposed new conceptual constructions that illuminate our perspective of the world. In addition, this study examines the uncertainty of quantum theory, especially the chaos, the principles of discontinuity, and the arguments raised by it, which affect the management and educational sciences.

I learn how ignorant I am when I learn

Anonymous folk culture

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aydın, M. (1998). Eğitim Yönetimi. Ankara: Hatipoğlu Yayınevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydın, M. (2010). Eğitim Yönetimi. Ankara: Hatipoğlu Yayınevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barutçugil, İ. (2014). Liderlik. İstanbul: Kariyer Yayıncılık.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 9(3), 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkmen, H. www.halukberkmen.net

  • Çobanoğlu, İ. (2008). Bilgisayar ve öğretim teknolojileri öğretmen adaylarının bilgisayar destekli öğretime vebilgisayara yönelik tutumları. I. Uluslararası Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Sempozyumu Bildiriler Kitabı, 16–18 Mayıs 2007, 298–306. Çanakkale Onsekizmart Üniversitesi, Çanakkale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dargahi, B. (2003). Scour development downstream of a spillway. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 41, 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221680309499986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, D. S. & Williams, G. (2006). Synergy leadership in quantum organizations. Retrieved from http://trizjournal.com/archives/2006/10/08.pdf

  • Değirmenci, M., & Utku, Ş (2000). Yönetim ve Örgüt Yapısına Kuantum Mekaniği Açısından Bir Bakış.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (1999). Kuantum Liderlik Paradigması ile Eğitim Liderliğinin Açımlanması (Eplication of Educational Leadership with Quantum Leadership Pradigm). Cumhuriyet Döneminde Eğitim. Talim ve Terbiye Dairesi Ankara: M.E.B. Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2000). Lider Sarmalında Vizyon. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş. (2001). Örgütsel Zekâ (Organizational Intelligence). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erçetin, Ş. Ş., & Kamacı, M. C. (2008). Quantum leadership paradigm. World Applied Sciences Journal, 6(3), 865–868.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, H. (1995). Chaos and management developement in educational institution. WW\!J.rricb.co.ukjserviees/artielels/doeu ment/jea/gu nter.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helvacı, M. A., & Aydoğan, İ. (2011). Etkili Okul ve Etkili Okul Müdürüne İlişkin Öğretmen Görüşleri. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2), 42–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, J. (2004). Introduction: Aid and development. The Economic Journal, 114, F185–F190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00218.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keçecioğlu, T. (1998). Liderlik ve Liderler, Istanbul: KalDer Yayınları No:24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koçel T. (1998). “Isletme Yöneticiligi”, Beta Basim Dagitim AS., IstanbuL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malherbe, F. (2010). Self-fulfilling liquidity dry-ups. National Bank of Belgium, Research series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özdemir, S. (2013). Eğitim Yönetiminde Kuram ve Kavrama. Ankara: Pegem Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1984). Coming to a New Awareness of Organizational Culture. Sloan Management Review, 25(2), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Şenyılmaz, A. (2012). Yönetimde Kuantum Yaklaşımı. In Organizasyonel Enerjinin Ölçümü İçin Bir Model. İstanbul: İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, C. D., & Darling, J. R. (2001). The quantum skills model in management: a new paradigm to enhance effective leadership. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 22(5/6), 264–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Şişman, M., & Turan, S. (2002). Egitimde Toplam Kalite Yönetimi. Ankara: Pegem A Yayincilik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tengilimoğlu, D. (2005). Hizmet işletmelerinde liderlik davranışları ile iş doyumu arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Gaz Üniversitesi Ticaret ve Turizm Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(24), 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uzunçarşılı, Ü. & Soydaş U. A. (2007). Farklılıkların yönetimi ve ayrımcılığı: Đş dünyasında kadın olmak, Đçinde Beliz Dereli, (Ed.), Đşgücünde Farklılıkların Yönetimi, 31–59, Đstanbul: Beta Basım Yayın Dağıtım.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, I. (2006). The nursing practice of taking level 1 patient observations. Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, 22(2), 115–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahar, D. (1998). Kuantum Benlik (Çeviren S. Kervanoğlu) İstanbul Sarmal Yayınları.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D. (1997). Rewiring the corporate brain: Using the new science to rethink.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saran, A. (2019). Discussion on Erçetin’s Quantum Leadership Paradigm in Terms of the School or Classroom Management. In: Erçetin, Ş., Potas, N. (eds) Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2017. ICCLS 2017. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89875-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89875-9_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89874-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89875-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics