Abstract
A common issue that theatre professors may struggle with is balancing course content with significant writing requirements. How do we make our students better writers and critical thinkers while maintaining time for course content? Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) pedagogy and practices, such as scaffolded writing, teaching collaboration, and peer review, offer a student-centered model for addressing this issue and facilitate student academic success. In this paper, we offer an example of a scaffolded approach to the research paper assignment designed for our World Theatre courses at City University of New York–Hunter College. We first discuss WAC pedagogy and practices as implemented in other fields and their research findings. We then lay out the scaffolding design of our research paper assignment and explain the various exercises and activities we implemented throughout the semester. Next, we discuss three different case studies to exhibit the usefulness of scaffolded design for three unique student types, before turning our attention to the benefits of the scaffolded process. We conclude by describing our assessment tools and the rationale behind these grading methods, along with reflections on the process as well as recommendations for its implementation in other courses.
The authors would like to thank Jordan Cohen , who worked with us as Writing Fellow and conducted research and participated in the drafting of the article proposal, and Dennis Paoli, Coordinator of Hunter’s Rockowitz Writing Center and Co-Coordinator of Hunter’s Writing Across the Curriculum program, who initially suggested that we collaborate on an article about this process, and who provided valuable resources on WAC and CUNY . The authors also wish to thank their World Theatre students for participating in their experimentation with these writing exercises.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
For discussions on assessment, see also the chapter, “Theatre Assessment for Teaching and Learning.”
- 3.
This rubric is modeled after Bean’s design and rationale, see Bean 2011, p. 280.
References
Aries, Nancy. 2010. Writing Across the Curriculum at CUNY: A Ten-Year Review. CUNY: Office of Undergraduate Education. http://www2.cuny.edu/wpcontent/uploads/sites/4/page-assets/about/administration/offices/undergraduate-studies/wac/WAC10YearReportJune2010.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2017.
Bean, John C. 2011. Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cho, Kwangsu, and Christian D. Schunn. 2007. Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline: A Web-Based Peer Review System. Computers & Education 48: 409–426.
Ciabattari, Teresa. 2013. Creating a Culture of Good Writing: A Cumulative Model for Teaching Writing in the Sociology Major. Teaching Sociology 41 (1): 60–69.
Defazio, Joseph, Josette Jones, Felisa Tennant, and Sara Anne Hook. 2010. Academic Literacy: The Importance and Impact of Writing Across the Curriculum—A Case Study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 10 (2): 34–47.
Eaton, Carrie Diaz, and Stephanie Wade. 2014. Collaborative Learning Through Formative Peer Review with Technology. Primus 24 (6): 529–543.
Forsyth, Donelson R. 2016. College Teaching: Practical Insights from the Science of Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Grimm, Stephanie Dehning. 2015. Learning Logs: Incorporating Writing-to-Learn Assignments into Accounting Courses. Issue in Accounting Education 30 (2): 79–104.
Hagenauer, Gerda, and Simone E. Volet. 2014. Teacher-Student Relationship at University: An Important Yet Under-Researched Field. Oxford Review of Education 40 (3): 370–388.
Kirby, Dawn Latta. 2016. Reading and Writing Relationships: Narratives at the Core of the English Classroom. English Journal 105 (3): 43–48.
Komarraju, Meera, Sergey Musulkin, and Gargi Bhattacharya. 2010. Role of Student-Faculty Interactions in Developing College Students’ Academic Self-Concept, Motivation, and Achievement. Journal of College Student Development 51 (3): 332–342.
Luthy, Karlen E., Neil E. Peterson, Jane H. Lassetter, and Lynn C. Callister. 2009. Successfully Incorporating Writing Across the Curriculum with Advanced Writing in Nursing. Journal of Nursing Education 48 (1): 54–59.
Nicol, David, Avril Thomson, and Caroline Breslin. 2014. Rethinking Feedback Practice in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122.
Randolph, Gary B. 2000. Collaborative Learning in the Classroom: A Writing Across the Curriculum Approach. Journal of Engineering Education 89 (2): 119–122.
Sharp, Julie E., John N. Harb, and Ronald E. Terry. 1997. Combining Kolb Learning Styles and Writing to Learn in Engineering Classes. Journal of Engineering Education 86 (2): 93–101.
Shibley, Ivan A., Jr., Louis M. Milakofsky, and Cynthia L. Nicotera. 2001. Incorporating a Substantial Writing Assignment into Organic Chemistry: Library Research, Peer Review, and Assessment. Journal of Chemical Education 78 (1): 50–53.
Soysa, Champika K., Dana S. Dunn, Andrea L. Dottolo, Alyson L. Burns-Glover, and Regan A.R. Gurung. 2013. Orchestrating Authorship: Writing Across the Psychology Curriculum. Teaching of Psychology 40 (2): 88–97.
Umbach, Paul D., and Matthew R. Wawrzynski. 2005. Faculty Do Matter: The Role of College Faculty in Student Learning and Engagement. Research in Higher Education 46 (2): 153–184.
WAC Clearinghouse. 2017. An Introduction to Writing Across the Curriculum. Colorado State University. https://wac.colostate.edu/intro/. Accessed 30 May 2017.
Williamson, Michael M. 1987. Basic Writers Writing Across the Disciplines I: An Historical and Theoretical Introduction. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education 4 (1): 57–69.
———. 1988. Basic Writers Writing Across the Disciplines II: The Structure of Programs, Implications for Basic Writers, and Strategies for Teaching. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education 4 (2): 72–88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aliano, K., Chang, D. (2018). Teaching Critical Writing in the World Theatre Course: WAC Pedagogy and the Scaffolded Research Paper. In: Fliotsos, A., Medford, G. (eds) New Directions in Teaching Theatre Arts. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89767-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89767-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89766-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89767-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)