Skip to main content

Teaching Critical Writing in the World Theatre Course: WAC Pedagogy and the Scaffolded Research Paper

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover New Directions in Teaching Theatre Arts
  • 290 Accesses

Abstract

A common issue that theatre professors may struggle with is balancing course content with significant writing requirements. How do we make our students better writers and critical thinkers while maintaining time for course content? Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) pedagogy and practices, such as scaffolded writing, teaching collaboration, and peer review, offer a student-centered model for addressing this issue and facilitate student academic success. In this paper, we offer an example of a scaffolded approach to the research paper assignment designed for our World Theatre courses at City University of New York–Hunter College. We first discuss WAC pedagogy and practices as implemented in other fields and their research findings. We then lay out the scaffolding design of our research paper assignment and explain the various exercises and activities we implemented throughout the semester. Next, we discuss three different case studies to exhibit the usefulness of scaffolded design for three unique student types, before turning our attention to the benefits of the scaffolded process. We conclude by describing our assessment tools and the rationale behind these grading methods, along with reflections on the process as well as recommendations for its implementation in other courses.

The authors would like to thank Jordan Cohen , who worked with us as Writing Fellow and conducted research and participated in the drafting of the article proposal, and Dennis Paoli, Coordinator of Hunter’s Rockowitz Writing Center and Co-Coordinator of Hunter’s Writing Across the Curriculum program, who initially suggested that we collaborate on an article about this process, and who provided valuable resources on WAC and CUNY . The authors also wish to thank their World Theatre students for participating in their experimentation with these writing exercises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For studies on the impact of student-faculty relationship on student academic success, see, for example, Umbach and Wawrzynski 2005; Hagenauer and Volet 2014; Komarraju et al. 2010.

  2. 2.

    For discussions on assessment, see also the chapter, “Theatre Assessment for Teaching and Learning.”

  3. 3.

    This rubric is modeled after Bean’s design and rationale, see Bean 2011, p. 280.

References

  • Aries, Nancy. 2010. Writing Across the Curriculum at CUNY: A Ten-Year Review. CUNY: Office of Undergraduate Education. http://www2.cuny.edu/wpcontent/uploads/sites/4/page-assets/about/administration/offices/undergraduate-studies/wac/WAC10YearReportJune2010.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2017.

  • Bean, John C. 2011. Engaging Ideas: The Professor’s Guide to Integrating Writing, Critical Thinking, and Active Learning in the Classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Kwangsu, and Christian D. Schunn. 2007. Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline: A Web-Based Peer Review System. Computers & Education 48: 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciabattari, Teresa. 2013. Creating a Culture of Good Writing: A Cumulative Model for Teaching Writing in the Sociology Major. Teaching Sociology 41 (1): 60–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defazio, Joseph, Josette Jones, Felisa Tennant, and Sara Anne Hook. 2010. Academic Literacy: The Importance and Impact of Writing Across the Curriculum—A Case Study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 10 (2): 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, Carrie Diaz, and Stephanie Wade. 2014. Collaborative Learning Through Formative Peer Review with Technology. Primus 24 (6): 529–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, Donelson R. 2016. College Teaching: Practical Insights from the Science of Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, Stephanie Dehning. 2015. Learning Logs: Incorporating Writing-to-Learn Assignments into Accounting Courses. Issue in Accounting Education 30 (2): 79–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagenauer, Gerda, and Simone E. Volet. 2014. Teacher-Student Relationship at University: An Important Yet Under-Researched Field. Oxford Review of Education 40 (3): 370–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, Dawn Latta. 2016. Reading and Writing Relationships: Narratives at the Core of the English Classroom. English Journal 105 (3): 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komarraju, Meera, Sergey Musulkin, and Gargi Bhattacharya. 2010. Role of Student-Faculty Interactions in Developing College Students’ Academic Self-Concept, Motivation, and Achievement. Journal of College Student Development 51 (3): 332–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthy, Karlen E., Neil E. Peterson, Jane H. Lassetter, and Lynn C. Callister. 2009. Successfully Incorporating Writing Across the Curriculum with Advanced Writing in Nursing. Journal of Nursing Education 48 (1): 54–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, David, Avril Thomson, and Caroline Breslin. 2014. Rethinking Feedback Practice in Higher Education: A Peer Review Perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 39 (1): 102–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, Gary B. 2000. Collaborative Learning in the Classroom: A Writing Across the Curriculum Approach. Journal of Engineering Education 89 (2): 119–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, Julie E., John N. Harb, and Ronald E. Terry. 1997. Combining Kolb Learning Styles and Writing to Learn in Engineering Classes. Journal of Engineering Education 86 (2): 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibley, Ivan A., Jr., Louis M. Milakofsky, and Cynthia L. Nicotera. 2001. Incorporating a Substantial Writing Assignment into Organic Chemistry: Library Research, Peer Review, and Assessment. Journal of Chemical Education 78 (1): 50–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soysa, Champika K., Dana S. Dunn, Andrea L. Dottolo, Alyson L. Burns-Glover, and Regan A.R. Gurung. 2013. Orchestrating Authorship: Writing Across the Psychology Curriculum. Teaching of Psychology 40 (2): 88–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umbach, Paul D., and Matthew R. Wawrzynski. 2005. Faculty Do Matter: The Role of College Faculty in Student Learning and Engagement. Research in Higher Education 46 (2): 153–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WAC Clearinghouse. 2017. An Introduction to Writing Across the Curriculum. Colorado State University. https://wac.colostate.edu/intro/. Accessed 30 May 2017.

  • Williamson, Michael M. 1987. Basic Writers Writing Across the Disciplines I: An Historical and Theoretical Introduction. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education 4 (1): 57–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. Basic Writers Writing Across the Disciplines II: The Structure of Programs, Implications for Basic Writers, and Strategies for Teaching. Research and Teaching in Developmental Education 4 (2): 72–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Aliano, K., Chang, D. (2018). Teaching Critical Writing in the World Theatre Course: WAC Pedagogy and the Scaffolded Research Paper. In: Fliotsos, A., Medford, G. (eds) New Directions in Teaching Theatre Arts. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89767-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics