Abstract
Skin tests are important in the diagnosis of contact urticaria syndrome and can usually be carried out quickly, inexpensively, and safely. The skin prick test remains the investigation of choice for most patients with immunological contact urticaria in addition to its wider application in the diagnosis of allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, and food allergy. If skin prick tests and in vitro tests for allergen-specific IgE are negative, a provocation/challenge test may ultimately be required for diagnosis. Nonstandardized tests for contact urticaria include open testing, closed chamber testing, and scratch and scratch-chamber testing. Correct technique is essential to avoid false-negative results, which may put the patient at ongoing risk of exposure, and false-positive results, which can have important social, occupational, and medicolegal consequences. Staff carrying out these procedures should be appropriately trained and equipped to handle severe allergic reactions including anaphylaxis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ylipieti S, Lahti A. Effect of the vehicle on nonimmunologic immediate contact reactions. Contact Dermatitis. 1989;21:105.
Amin S, Maibach HI. Immunologic contact urticaria definition. Chapter 2. In: Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI, editors. Contact urticaria syndrome. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1997. p. 11–26.
Hjorth N, Roed-Petersen J. Occupational protein contact dermatitis in food handlers. Contact Dermatitis. 1976;2:28–42.
Hannuksela M. Skin tests for immediate hypersensitivity. Chapter 26. In: Rycroft RJG, Menne T, Freosch PJ, Lepoittevin J-P, editors. Textbook of contact dermatitis. 3rd ed: Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2001. p. 521–6.
Lahti A. Nonimmunologic contact urticaria. Chapter 1. In: Amin S, Lahti A, Maibach HI, editors. Contact urticaria syndromee. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1997. p. 5–10.
Oranje AP, Van Gysdel D, Mulder PG, Dieges PH. Food induced Contact Urticaria Syndrome (CUS) in atopic dermatitis: reproducibility of repeated and duplicate testing with a skin provocation test, the Skin Application Food Test (SAFT). Contact Dermatitis. 1994;31:314–8.
de Waard-van der Spek FB, Elst EF, Mulder PGH, Munte K, ACA D, Oranje SP. Diagnostic tests in children with atopic dermatitis and food allergy. Allergy. 1998;53:1087–91.
Clemmensen O, Hjorth N. Perioral contact urticaria from sorbic acid and benzoic acid in a salad dressing. Contact Dermatitis. 1982;8:1–6.
Ebruster H. The prick test, a recent cutaneous test for the diagnosis of allergic disorders. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1959;71:551–4.
Bryden M. Skin prick testing in clinical practice. Norfolk: NADAAS; 2000.
Resuscitation Council UK. Emergency treatment of anaphylactic reactions; guidelines for healthcare providers. 2008. https://www.resus.org.uk/anaphylaxis/emergency-treatment-of-anaphylactic-reactions/
Shah KM, Rank MA, Dave SA, Lslie CL, Butterfield JH. Predicting which medication classes interfere with allergy skin testing. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2010;31:477–82.
vanKampen V, deBlay F, Folletti I, et al. EAACI position paper: skin prick testing in the diagnosis of occupational type 1 allergies. Allergy. 2013;68:580–4.
Heinzerling L, Mari A, Bergmann K-C. The skin prick test – European standards. Clin Transl Allergy. 2013;3:3–10.
Henzgen M, Ballmer-Weber BK, Erdmann S, et al. Skin testing with food alleergens. Guidelines of the German Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI), the Physicians’Association of German Allergologists (ADA) and the Society of Pediatric Allergology (GPA)together with the Swiss Society of Allergology. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2008;6:983–8.
Vlieg-Boerstra BJ, van de Wegg WE, van der Heide S, Dubois AE. Where to prick the apple for skin testing? Allergy. 2013;68:119608.43.
Niinimaki A. Scratch-chamber tests in food handler dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1987;16:11–20.
Turjanmaa K, Makinen-Kiljunen S, Reunala T, et al. Natural rubber latex allergy. The European experience. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 1995;15:71–87.
Hamilton RG, Adkinson NF. Validation of the latex glove provocation procedure in latex-allergic subjects. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997;79:226–72.
Hawkey S, Abdul Ghaffar S. Glove-related hand urticaria: an increasing occupational problem among healthcare workers. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174:1137–40.
Acknowledgments
I am grateful to Dr Sophie Farooque, Consultant Allergist, for her helpful comments on this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wakelin, S.H. (2018). Diagnostic Methods: Cutaneous Provocation Tests in Contact Urticaria Syndrome. In: Giménez-Arnau, A., Maibach, H. (eds) Contact Urticaria Syndrome. Updates in Clinical Dermatology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89764-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89764-6_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89763-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89764-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)