Skip to main content

State Formation, the Local and Hybridity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Peace Infrastructures and State-Building at the Margins

Part of the book series: Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies ((RCS))

  • 248 Accesses

Abstract

This brief chapter discusses the interrelated concepts of ‘the local’ and hybridity in the context of peace-building. Both have been theorised as analytical devices, as avenues of emancipation, and have in praxis been deployed as stratagems to further the agenda of institutional state- and peace-building. In this sense the chapter serves as a bridge between the preceding chapter and the one that follows, on peace infrastructures, which have in different ways relied on these concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hameiri, on the other hand argues that this encounter does not so much result in hybrid states but an altogether new form of statehood, a depoliticised regulatory kind (Hameiri, 2011, pp. 197–202).

List of References

  • Autesserre, S. (2009). Hobbes and the Congo: Frames, Local Violence, and International Intervention. International Organization, 63(2), 249. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818309090080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balthasar, D. (2015). From Hybridity to Standardization: Rethinking State-Making in Contexts of Fragility. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 9(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2015.993502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., & Zürcher, C. (2009). The Peacebuilder’s Contract: How External Statebuilding Reinforces Weak Statehood. In R. Paris & T. D. Sisk (Eds.), The Dilemmas of Statebuilding: Confronting the Contradictions of Postwar Peace Operations (pp. 23–52). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belloni, R. (2012). Hybrid Peace Governance: Its Emergence and Significance. Global Governance, 18, 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bliesemann de Guevara, B. (2010). Introduction: The Limits of Statebuilding and the Analysis of State-Formation. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 4(2), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502970903533652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boege, V., Brown, A., Clements, K. P., & Nolan, A. (2008). On Hybrid Political Orders and Emerging States: State Formation in the Context of “Fragility”. Berlin: Berghof Research Centre for Constructive Conflict Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canuday, J. J. (2014). Big War, Small Wars: The Interplay of Large-scale and Community Armed Conflicts in Five Central Mindanao Communities. In W. M. Torres III (Ed.), Rido: Clan Feuding and Conflict Management in Mindanao (Expanded ed., pp. 220–253). Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau, M., Jameson, F., & Lovitt, C. (1980). On the Oppositional Practices of Everyday Life. Social Text, 3, 3–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hameiri, S. (2007). Failed States or a Failed Paradigm? State Capacity and the Limits of Institutionalism. Journal of International Relations and Development, 10(2), 122–149. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hameiri, S. (2011). A Reality Check for the Critique of the Liberal Peace. In S. Campbell, D. Chandler, & M. Sabaratnam (Eds.), A Liberal Peace? The Problems and Practices of Peacebuilding (pp. 191–208). Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, S., & Barnett, J. (2012). Localising Peace: The Young Men of Bougainville’s ‘Crisis Generation’. Political Geography, 31(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerkvliet, B. J. T. (2013). Everyday Politics in the Philippines: Class and Status Relations in a Central Luzon Village. Quezon City: Ateneo de Manila University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, K. (2012). Hybrid Violence: Locating the Use of Force in Postconflict Settings. Global Governance, 18, 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardsson, H., & Rudd, G. (2015). The ‘Local Turn’ in Peacebuilding: A Literature Review of Effective and Emancipatory Local Peacebuilding. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 825–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1029905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2011a). Hybrid Peace: How Does Hybrid Peace Come About? In S. Campbell, D. Chandler, & M. Sabaratnam (Eds.), A Liberal Peace? The Problems and Practices of Peacebuilding. Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2011b). International Peacebuilding and Local Resistance: Hybrid Forms of Peace. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. P. (2013). The Local Turn in Peace Building: A Critical Agenda for Peace. Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 763–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2013.800750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, S. J. A. (2009). Insider Mediators: Exploring Their Key Role in Informal Peace Processes. Berlin: Berghof Foundation for Peace Support/Center For Security Studies, ETH Zurich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migdal, J. S. (1988). Strong Societies and Weak States: State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, G. (2014). Disaggregating Hybridity: Why Hybrid Institutions Do Not Produce Predictable Experiences of Peace. Journal of Peace Research, 51(4), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343313519465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouligny, B. (2009). Local Ownership. In V. Chetail (Ed.), Post-Conflict Peacebuilding: A Lexicon (pp. 174–187). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. (2015). Bringing the Outside In: Somaliland, Statebuilding and Dual Hybridity. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 9(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2014.991074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. P. (2009). The Romanticisation of the Local: Welfare, Culture and Peacebuilding. The International Spectator, 44(1), 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932720802693044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. P. (2013a). Failed Statebuilding Versus Peace Formation. Cooperation and Conflict, 48(3), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713482816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. P. (2013b). Peace Formation and Local Infrastructures for Peace. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 38(4), 271–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0304375413512100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. C. (1999). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSG. (1992). An Agenda for Peace: Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peace-Keeping (A/47/277–S/24111). New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1997). World Development Report 1997: The State in a Changing World.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kovács, B.Á. (2019). State Formation, the Local and Hybridity. In: Peace Infrastructures and State-Building at the Margins. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89566-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics