Skip to main content

Operative Vaginal Birth

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Medicolegal Issues in Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Abstract

The rate of operative vaginal births (OVBs) is stable in the UK running at approximately 12% of all deliveries. OVB is in the main a safe practice when performed in the correct setting by an appropriately trained operator, producing good outcomes for the majority of mothers and babies. There should be a balance of risk. Instrumental delivery is safer than a caesarean section at full dilatation for the mother and causes less impact on future pregnancies, as most women will achieve a vaginal birth in a subsequent pregnancy. A caesarean section at full dilatation, however, shows reduced rates of traumatic birth injury to the baby. Despite the fact that in most cases the outcomes are good for forceps and vacuum assisted deliveries, these births still generate a considerable cost in terms of litigation when they are performed sub optimally, or when the baby is born in poor condition. All obstetricians require appropriate training and supervision to ensure these deliveries are performed safely in line with national guidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Verity L, Swingler R, Patel R. Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study. Lancet. 2001;358(9289):1203–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Murphy DJ, Koh DKM. Cohort study of the decision to delivery interval and neonatal outcome for emergency operative vaginal delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(2):145.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bahl R, Strachan B, Murphy DJ. Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study. BMJ. 2004;328(7435):311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jolly J, Walker J, Bhabra K. Subsequent obstetric performance related to primary mode of delivery. BJOG. 1999;106(3):227–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark EAS, Silver RM. Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205(6 Suppl):S2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moraitis AA, Oliver-Williams C, Wood AM, Fleming M, Pell JP, Smith G. Previous caesarean delivery and the risk of unexplained stillbirth: retrospective cohort study and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2015;122(11):1467–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. NHS Litigation Authority. Ten years of maternity claims. London: NHS Litigation Authority; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  8. RCOG. Operative vaginal delivery. 2011. pp. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Watts P, Maguire S, Kwok T, Talabani B, Mann M, Wiener J, et al. Newborn retinal hemorrhages: a systematic review. J AAPOS Elsevier. 2013;17(1):70–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Senécal J, Xiong X, Fraser WD. Pushing early or pushing late with epidural study group. Effect of fetal position on second-stage duration and labor outcome. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(4):763–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bahl R, Murphy DJ, Strachan B. Qualitative analysis by interviews and video recordings to establish the components of a skilled rotational forceps delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Elsevier. 2013;170(2):341–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aiken AR, Aiken CE, Alberry MS, Brockelsby JC, Scott JG. Management of fetal malposition in the second stage of labor: a propensity score analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(3):355.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. O'Brien S, Day F, Lenguerrand E, Cornthwaite K, Edwards S, Siassakos D. Rotational forceps versus manual rotation and direct forceps: a retrospective cohort study. EJOG. Elsevier Ireland Ltd. 2017;212:119–25.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wattar Al BH, Wattar BA, Gallos I, Pirie AM. Rotational vaginal delivery with Kiellandʼs forceps. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;27(6):438–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Murphy DJ, Macleod M, Bahl R, Strachan B. A cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of sequential instruments at operative vaginal delivery. EJOG Elsevier Ireland Ltd. 2011;156(1):41–5.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hamasaki T, Hagihara A. A comparison of medical litigation filed against obstetrics and gynecology, internal medicine, and surgery departments. BMC Med Ethics. 2015;16(1):72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. GMC. Consent: patients and doctors making decisions together. 2017. p. 1–66.

    Google Scholar 

  18. UKSC TSC. Montgomery (Appellant) v Lanarkshire Health Board (Respondent). 2015. pp. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Draycott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

O’Brien, S., ElHodaiby, M., Draycott, T. (2018). Operative Vaginal Birth. In: Jha, S., Ferriman, E. (eds) Medicolegal Issues in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78683-4_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78683-4_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78682-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78683-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics