Skip to main content

Tales of a Failed Scientific Revolution. Wynne-Edwards’ Animal Dispersion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multilevel Selection and the Theory of Evolution
  • 220 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter aims to cover the fierce rejection of Vero Copner Wynne-Edwards’ account of animal dispersion and population dynamics by many neo-Darwinian life scientists during the 1960s and 1970s. It is argued that Wynne-Edwards’ proposed revolution failed for two reasons: One is related to the particular notion of group selection he employed, criticized by George Williams, David Lack and others. The other is the notion of “group” that underlies Wynne-Edwards’ theory: any group of higher animals is a social group, defined by the usual biological standards, but also by the conventions that regulate its members’ behaviour. If sociality is essential to a biological concept of population, then this means that biology becomes a border science between the natural and the social.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Axelrod, R. (1984). The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. (2005). Natural justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boem, F., Ratti, E., Andreoletti, M., & Boniolo, G. (2016). Why genes are like lemons. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 56, 88–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrello, M. (2010). Evolutionary restraints. The contentious history of group selection. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., & Eldredge, N. (1977). Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology, 3, 115–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeler, C. (2016). Do we need a new account of group selection? A reply to McLoone. Biological Theory, 11(2), 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C. J. (1985). Ecology: The experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lack, D. (1966). Population studies of birds. Oxford: Claredon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, T. R. (1976). Life, the individual, the species. St. Louis: C.V. Mosby Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. (1961). Evolution and the theory of games. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1(3), 382–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, E. (1988). The structure and confirmation of evolutionary theory. Westport: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1964). Group selection and kin selection. Nature, 201(4924), 1145–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1972). On evolution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (2004). What makes biology unique. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McLoone, B. (2015). Some criticism of the contextual approach, and a few proposals. Biological Theory, 10(2), 116–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millstein, R. (2010). The concepts of population and metapopulation in evolutionary biology and ecology. In M. A. Bell, D. J. Futuyama, W. F. Eanes, & J. S Levinton (Eds.), Evolution since Darwin: The first 150 years (pp. 61–87). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okasha, S. (2006). Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Purves, W. K., & Orians, G. H. (1983). Life: The science of biology. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (1984). The nature of selection: Evolutionary theory in philosophical focus. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behaviour. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, S. M. (1975). A theory of evolution above the species level. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 72(2), 646–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1985). Social evolution. San Francisco, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M. J. (1978). A critical review of the models of group selection. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 53(2), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (Ed.). (1971). Group selection. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt, U., & Beck, N. (2015). Austrian economics and the evolutionary paradigm. In C. Coyne & P. Boettke (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Austrian economics (pp. 576–593). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Edwards, V. C. (1962). Animal dispersion in relation to social behaviour. London: Oliver & Boyd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Edwards, V. C. (1971). Intergroup selection in the evolution of social systems. In G. Williams (Ed.), Group selection (pp. 93–104). ‎New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne-Edwards, V. C. (1986). Evolution through group selection. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant of the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation, CNCS—UEFISCDI, project number PN-II-RU-TE-2014-4-2653.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cernea, MV. (2018). Tales of a Failed Scientific Revolution. Wynne-Edwards’ Animal Dispersion. In: Jeler, C. (eds) Multilevel Selection and the Theory of Evolution. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78677-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics