Skip to main content

Surrogacy in India: Political and Commercial Framings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cross-Cultural Comparisons on Surrogacy and Egg Donation

Abstract

India stood as a ‘baby cradle’ for the world, and a preferred destination for IVF and surrogacy. Based on the empirical research in different cities in India, and secondary sources, the authors address the policy shifts and the process in which surrogacy became a debatable issue. From unregulated commercial gestational surrogacy, the policy shifted to proposing a complete ban on commercial surrogacy allowing only altruistic surrogacy for Indian couples. The law on surrogacy is still in its making and various stakeholders are advocating towards reversal of the proposed ban, as it will incur financial huge losses for the IVF clinics and surrogates. It is yet to be seen when the law will be passed and what will be the final decision, who will monitor and regulate it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Bureau, B. (2017). IVF market in India to reach $775 million by 2022. Business Standard [online]. Available at http://www.business-standard.com/content/b2b-pharma/ivf-market-in-india-to-reach-775-million-by-2022-117050200507_1.html. Accessed 13 Aug 2017.

  • Carney, J. (2015). Baby boy abandoned in India by parents who kept his twin sister but left him behind ‘as they already had a boy and couldn’t afford twins’. Mail Online [online]. Available at http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3137049/Baby-boy-abandoned-India-surrogate-parents-kept-twin-sister-left-boy-couldn-t-afford-twins.html. Accessed 2 Apr 2017.

  • Cohen, L. (2008). Operability, bioavailability and exception. In A. Ong & S. J. Collier (Eds.), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems (pp. 79–90). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier, G. K. D. (2010). Protecting cross-border providers of ova and surrogacy services? Global Social Policy, 10(3), 299–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deomampo, D. (2013). Transnational surrogacy in India: Interrogating power and women’s agency. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 34(3), 167–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S. (1997). Embodied progress: A cultural account of assisted conception. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, S., & Ragoné, H. (1998). Reproducing reproduction: Kinship, power, and technological innovation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganguly, M. (2013). India’s Supreme Court upholds right to privacy. Human Rights Watch [online]. Available at https://www.hrw.org/news/2017/08/24/indias-supreme-court-upholds-right-privacy. Accessed 18 Nov 2017.

  • Ganguly, S., & Unisa, S. (2010). Trends of infertility and childlessness in India: Findings from NFHS data. Facts, Views & Visions in ObGyn, 2(2), 131–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, F., & Rapp, R. (1991). The politics of reproduction. Annual Review of Anthropology, 20, 311–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A. S. (2008). Medical tourism in India: Winners and losers. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 5(1), 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J. A., & Richters, A. (2008). Embodied subjects and fragmented objects: Women’s bodies, assisted reproduction technologies and the right to self-determination. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 5, 239–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, B. (2006). Everyday eugenics. ZCommunications [online]. Available at https://zcomm.org/znetarticle/everyday-eugenics-by-betsy-hartmann/. Accessed 19 Oct 2017.

  • Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). (2005). National guidelines for the supervision and regulation of ART clinics in India [online]. Available at http://icmr.nic.in/art/art_clinics.htm. Accessed 29 Apr 2017.

  • Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR). (2010). National registry of assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinics and banks in India [online]. Available at http://www.icmr.nic.in/icmrnews/art/art.htm. Accessed 13 Aug 2017.

  • Indian Society for the Study of Reproduction and Fertility (ISSRF). (2017, January 23–25). Souvenir and Abstract Book. International conference on reproductive health with emphasis on strategies for infertility, assisted reproduction and family planning. Organised by ISSRF, ICMR and Indian fertility society (IFS) and other organisations, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inhorn, M., & Van Balen, F. (2002). Infertility around the globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusum, S. (2017). Souvenir and Abstract Book. New Delhi: Indian Society for the Study of Reproduction and Fertility (ISSRF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Markens, S. (2012). The global reproductive health market: U.S. media framings and public discourses about transnational surrogacy. Social Science and Medicine, 74(11), 1745–1753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. (2008). The Assisted Reproductive Technology (Regulation) Bill 2008 [pdf]. Available at http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/vikas_doc/docs/1241500084~~DraftARTBill.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2017.

  • Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi. (2010). The Assisted Reproductive Technologies (Regulation) Bill [online]. Available at http://icmr.nic.in/guide/ART%20REGULATION%20Draft%20Bill1.pdf Accessed 29 Apr 2017.

  • Mitra, S., & Schicktanz, S. (2016). Failed surrogate conceptions: Social and ethical aspects of preconception disruptions during commercial surrogacy in India. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine [online]. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5075174/pdf/13010_2016_Article_40.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2017.

  • Overall, C. (2012). Ethics and human reproduction: A feminist analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palattiyil, G., Blyth, E., Sidhva, D., & Balakrishnan, G. (2010). Globalization and cross-border reproductive services: Ethical implications of surrogacy in India for social work. International Social Work, 53(5), 686–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pande, A. (2009). “It may be her eggs but it’s my blood”: Surrogates and everyday forms of kinship in India. Qualitative Sociology, 32(4), 379–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pande, A. (2010). Commercial surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a perfect mother-worker. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 35, 969–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pande, A. (2017). Gestational surrogacy in India: New dynamics of reproductive labour. In E. Noronha & P. D’Cruz (Eds.), Critical perspectives on work and employment in globalizing India (pp. 267–282). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parliament of India. (2016). The Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill 2016 [pdf]. Available at http://www.prsindia.org/uploads/media/Surrogacy/Surrogacy%20%28Regulation%29%20Bill,%202016.pdf. Accessed 7 Nov 2017.

  • Qadeer, I. (2010). Benefits and threats of international trade in health: A case of surrogacy in India. Global Social Policy, 10, 303–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qadeer, I., & John, M. E. (2009). The business and ethics of surrogacy. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(2), 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, M. (2012). Why all non-altruistic surrogacy should be banned. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(21), 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, S., & Patel, T. (2012). Reproductive tourism in India: An ethnographic study of surrogacy in Hyderabad. New Delhi: Ministry of Women and Child Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, S., & Patel, T. (2015). “There are many eggs in my body”: Medical markets and commodified bodies in India. Global Bioethics, 26(3–4), 218–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, S., Patel, T., Tanderup, M., & Nielsen, B. B. (2015). Breastfeeding and bonding: Issues and dilemmas in surrogacy. In T. Cassidy & A. El-Tom (Eds.), Ethnographies of breast feeding: Cultural contexts and confrontations (pp. 157–171). London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, S., & Qadeer, I. (2010). Medical tourism in India: Progress or predicament. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(20), 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudrappa, S. (2010). Making India the “mother destination”: Outsourcing labor to Indian surrogates. Research in the Sociology of Work, 20, 253–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sama. (2007). Assisted reproductive technologies in India: Implications for women. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(23), 2184–2189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sama. (2009). Assisted reproductive technologies: For whose benefit? Economic and Political Weekly, 44(18), 25–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarojini, N., Marwah, V., & Shenoi, A. (2011). Globalisation of birth markets: A case study of assisted reproductive technologies in India. Globalization and Health, 7(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saravanan, S. (2013). An ethnomethodological approach to examine exploitation in the context of capacity, trust and experience of commercial surrogacy in India. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 8(1), 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheper-Hughes, N. (1985). Culture, scarcity, and maternal thinking: Maternal detachment and infant survival in a Brazilian shantytown. Ethnos, 13(4), 291–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahadevan, S. (2016). Tusshar Kapoor becomes father to baby boy using surrogacy. The Indian Express [online]. Available at http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/tusshar-kapoor-becomes-father-to-baby-boy-using-surrogacy-2878996/. Accessed 16 Nov 2017.

  • Shanley, M. L. (2002). Making babies, making families: What matters most in an age of reproductive technologies, surrogacy, adoption, and same-sex and unwed parents. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shivaraya, M., & Halemani, B. (2007). Infertility: Psycho-social consequence of infertility on women in India. Indian Journal of Social Development, 7(2), 309–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A., Dhaliwal, L. K., & Kaur, A. (1996). Infertility in a primary health centre of north India: A follow-up study. Journal of Family Welfare, 42(1), 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smerdon, U. R. (2008). Crossing bodies, crossing borders: International surrogacy between the United States and India. Cumberland Law Review, 39, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonwalkar, P. (2016). Regulate don’t ban surrogacy UK couples urge India. Hindustan Times [online]. Available at http://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/regulate-don-t-ban-surrogacy-uk-couples-urge-india/story-hHxLAjbbvbDF2nqj0gpsaJ.html. Accessed 6 Dec 2017.

  • Sreenivas, K., & Campo-Engelstein, L. (2010). Domestic and international surrogacy laws: Implications for cancer survivors. Cancer Treatment and Research, 156, 135–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanderup, M., Reddy, S., Patel, T., & Nielsen, B. B. (2015a) Informed consent in medical decision-making in commercial gestational surrogacy: A mixed methods study in New Delhi, India. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 94(5), 465–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanderup, M., Reddy, S., Patel, T., & Nielsen, B. B. (2015b). Reproductive ethics in commercial surrogacy: Decision-making in IVF clinics in New Delhi, India. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 12(3), 491–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teman, E. (2008). The social construction of surrogacy research: An anthropological critique of the psychosocial scholarship on surrogate motherhood. Social Science and Medicine, 67(7), 1104–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Times of India. (2015a). Surrogate mothers stage protest in Anand [online]. Available at https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/Surrogate-mothers-stage-protest-in-Anand/articleshow/49589988.cms. Accessed 6 Dec 2017.

  • The Times of India. (2015b). Women protest surrogacy ban for foreigners [online]. Available at https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/Women-protest-surrogacy-ban-for-foreigners/articleshow/49612904.cms. Accessed 6 Dec 2017.

  • The Times of India. (2017). I feel enormously blessed: Karan Johar [online]. Available at https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/bollywood/news/i-feel-enormously-blessed-karan-johar/articleshow/57473701.cms. Accessed 16 Nov 2017.

  • United Nations Population Information Network (POPIN). (1994, September). International conference on population and development (ICPD). Cairo [online]. Available at http://www.un.org/popin/icpd2.htm. Accessed 2 Apr 2017.

  • Vora, K. (2013). Potential, risk, and return in transnational Indian gestational surrogacy. Current Anthropology, 54(S7), 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, A. (2011). Cross-border assisted reproduction care in Asia: Implications for access, equity and regulations. Reproductive Health Matters, 19(37), 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Reddy, S., Patel, T., Kristensen, M.T., Nielsen, B.B. (2018). Surrogacy in India: Political and Commercial Framings. In: Mitra, S., Schicktanz, S., Patel, T. (eds) Cross-Cultural Comparisons on Surrogacy and Egg Donation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78670-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78670-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78669-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78670-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics