Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Integrating the Participants’ Perspective in the Study of Language and Communication Disorders pp 69–93Cite as

Introduction to the Preliminary Framework of a New Analytical Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 178 Accesses

Abstract

Approaches to language and communication disorders may substitute the notion of “language” with the analytical decoding of, for instance, talk, semiotic gesture, and emotional display. In this chapter, a non-telementational framework is presented as a new framework for approaching language and communication disorders. Tools inspired from practice theory, and concepts from integrational linguistics and ethnomethodology and conversation analysis are introduced in this joint framework. However, within integrational linguistics the notion of language (Harris 1981), linguistic models of language activity (Harris in Signs, language and communication, Routledge, London, 1996, Harris in Introduction to integrational linguistics, Pergamon, Oxford, 1998; Love in Lang Sci 61:1–35, 2017; Orman in Critical humanist perspectives: The integrational turn in philosophyof language and communication, Routledge, London, 2017), and data analysis (Duncker in Lang Sci 33:533–543, 2011; Fleming in Lang Sci 17:73–98, 1995, Fleming in Linguistics inside out, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 182–207, 1997; Toolan in Total speech: An integrational linguistic approach to language, Duke University Press, Durham, NC, 1996) are considered ontologically troublesome (second-order categories). Therefore, similarities and divergences between traditional models and the joined approaches are discussed by downgrading and discarding orthodox positioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, C. (2011). Forståelseshandlingen: En empirisk afprøvet teori om narrativ forståelse som situeret betydning i dannelse. PhD dissertation, Københavns Universitet, København.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Kok, C. (2008). The role of context in conversation analysis: Reviving an interest in ethno-methods. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(5), 886–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drew, P. (1998). Complaints about transgression and misconduct. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 31, 295–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, D. (2004). Som at gå i Jesus’ fodspor. In M. Rathje & L. Svenstrup (Eds.), Sprogpsykologi - udvalgte kerneemner (pp. 201–220). København: Museum Tusculanum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, D. (2005). Den integrerende kommunikationsmodel. In P. Widell & M. Kunøe (Eds.), 10. møde om udforskningen af dansk sprog (pp. 137–146). Aarhus: Fællestrykkeriet for Sundhedsvidenskab og Humaniora Aarhus Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncker, D. (2011). On the empirical challenge to integrational studies in language. Language Sciences, 33(4), 533–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (2012). Discursive and scientific psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 425–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, D. (1995). The search for an integrational account of language: Roy Harris and conversation analysis. Language Sciences, 17(1), 73–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, D. (1997). Is ethnomethodological conversation analysis an “integrational” account of language? In G. Wolf & N. Love (Eds.), Linguistics inside out (pp. 182–207). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glintborg, C. (2015). Disabled and not normal. Narrative Inquiry, 25(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glintborg, C. (Ed.). (2018). Rehabiliteringspsykologi: En introduktion i teori og praksis. Aarhus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1489–1522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2003). Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning in aphasia. In C. Goodwin (Ed.), Conversation and brain damage (pp. 90–116). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C. (2013). The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge. Journal of Pragmatics, 46(1), 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (1981). The language myth. London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (1987). The language machine. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (1996). Signs, language and communication. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (1998). Introduction to integrational linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2009a). Integrationist notes and papers 2006–2008. Gamlingay: A Bright Pen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2009b). After epistemology. Gamlingay: A Bright Pen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. (2012). Integrationist notes and papers 2012. Gamlingay: A Bright Pen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R., & Wolf, G. (Eds.). (2008). Integrational linguistics: A first reader. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, T. (2009). Participation and exclusion in third party complaints. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(12), 2435–2451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, T., & Traverso, V. (2009). Complaining in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(12), 2381–2384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann, J., & Gregersen, F. (1978). Gennem sproget; om undersøgelse af sprogbrug i samfundet. København: Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, C. (2017). The self and the “monkey selfie”: Law, integrationism and the nature of the first order/second order distinction. Language Sciences, 61, 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (1988). On the sequential organization of troubles-talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems, 35(4), 418–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, M., & Raudaskoski, P. (2016). Medieret diskursanalyse og neksusanalyse. In A. Horsbøl & P. Raudaskoski (Eds.), Diskurs og praksis: Teori, metode og analyse (pp. 89–109). København: Samfundslitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legg, C., & Penn, P. (2013). Uncertainty, vulnerability, and isolation: Factors framing quality of life with aphasia in a South African township. In N. Warren & L. Manderson (Eds.), Reframing disability and quality of life: A global perspective (pp. 17–37). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Love, N. (2004). Cognition and the language myth. Distributed cognition and integrational linguistics. Language Sciences, 26(6), 525–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love, N. (2017). On languaging and languages. Language Sciences, 61, 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, C. (2011). Towards applied integrationism: Integrating autism in teaching and coaching sessions. Language Sciences, 33(4), 593–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, C. (2015). Senhjerneskade i et forståelsesperspektiv. In S. Frimann, M. Sørensen, & H. Wentzer (Eds.), Sammenhænge i sundhedskommunikation (pp. 247–281). Aalborg: Aalborg Universitetsforlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orman, J. (2017). Indeterminacy in sociolinguistics and integrationist theory. In A. Pablé (Ed.), Critical humanist perspectives: The integrational turn in philosophy of language and communication (pp. 96–113). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pablé, A., & Hutton, C. (2015). Signs, meaning and experience. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pomerantz, A., & Fehr, J. B. (1997). Conversation analysis: An approach to the study of social action as sense-making practices. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 64–91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudaskoski, P. (2013). From understanding to participation: A relational approach to embodied practices. In T. Keisanen, E. Kärkkäinen, M. Rauniomaa, P. Siitonen, & M. Siromaa (Eds.), Multimodal discourses of participation, AfinLA yearbook (Vol. 71, pp. 103–121). Jyväskylä: Suomen Soveltavan Kielitieteen Yhdistyks (AFinLA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, A. (2008). Quoted in editor’s introduction. In H. Garfinkel (Ed.), Toward a sociological theory of information (pp. 1–100). Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. (2002). Towards a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruus, H. (1995). Danske kerneord (Vol. 1, pp. 3–18). København: Museum Tusculanum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1972). An initial investigation of the usability of conversational data for doing sociology. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 31–74). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation (Vols. 1–2). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. (2013). Activity as an indeterminate social event. In S. Reynolds, D. Egan, & A. Weneland (Eds.), Wittgenstein and Heidegger: Pathways and provocations (pp. 179–194). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R. (2001). Mediated discourse: The nexus of practice (pp. 1–18). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2004). Discourse and the emerging internet. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2007). Nexus analysis: Refocusing ethnography on action. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 608–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stax, T. (2005). Samtaler i detaljer, detaljer i samtalen. In M. Jarvinen & N. Mik-Meyer (Eds.), Kvalitative metoder i et interaktionistisk perspektiv (pp. 169–190). København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, T., & Cameron, D. (1987). Analysing conversation: Rules and units in the structure of talk. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tileagǎ, C., & Stokoe, E. (2016). Discursive psychology: Classic and contemporary issues. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toolan, M. (1996). Total speech: An integrational linguistic approach to language. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, S., Worrall, L., Rose, T., Dorze, G., Isaksen, J., Pak, A., et al. (2016). Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? An international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(14), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, N., & Manderson, L. (2013). Reframing disability and quality of life: Contextual nuances. In N. Warren & L. Manderson (Eds.), Reframing disability and quality of life: A global perspective (pp. 1–16). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S., & Potter, J. (2007). Discursive psychology. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 73–90). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. (2011). Changing interactional behavior: Using conversation analysis in intervention programmes for aphasic conversation. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk (pp. 32–53). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. (2014). Research on language and social interaction intervening with conversation analysis in speech and language therapy: Improving aphasic conversation intervening with conversation analysis in speech and language therapy. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 47(3), 219–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1995). WHOQOL–100. Division of Mental Health. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, F. (2014). System, order, creativity: Models of the human in the twentieth-century linguistic theories. PhD dissertation, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark

    Charlotte Marie Bisgaard Klemmensen

Authors
  1. Charlotte Marie Bisgaard Klemmensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotte Marie Bisgaard Klemmensen .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Klemmensen, C.M.B. (2018). Introduction to the Preliminary Framework of a New Analytical Perspective. In: Integrating the Participants’ Perspective in the Study of Language and Communication Disorders. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78634-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78634-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78633-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78634-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation