Skip to main content

Malpractise and Ethical Violations in Thyroid Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Thyroid and Parathyroid Diseases

Abstract

In this article we aimed to give information about the legal process, to reveal the troubles encountered, to inform the physicians, and to attract attention when an unexpected condition occurs in the thyroid surgery and is referred to the judiciary. For this purpose, based on the cases referred and finalized in the Turkish jurisdiction, short information on the subject of ethical, medical, and legal responsibilities, informed consent, discrimination of complication from malpractice, the concept of expertise and expertise institutions, and criminal and compensation cases of the physicians is provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Erdem Ü. Yargıtay 12. Ceza dairesi (2014–2016) kararlarında hekimin sorumluluğu (Physician’s liability in decisions by 12th civil chamber of supreme court), Hukuk Kitapları Serisi. 1st ed. İstanbul: Legal Yayıncılık; 2016. p.109–10, 293–5, 328–9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Savaş H. Yargıya yansıyan tıbbi müdahale hataları. tıbbi malpraktis-tıbbi davaların seyri ve sonuçları (Medical errors. Medical malpractice – the course and outcome of medical lawsuits). 3rd ed. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık; 2013. p. 25–70, 181–228.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Oral T. Hekimin aydınlatma ve hastanın rızasını alma yükümü. http://www.ankarabarosu.org.tr/siteler/ankarabarosu/tekmakale/2011-2/2011-2-8.pdf. Accessed 20 Apr 2017.

  4. Çakmut ÖY. Sağlık hukukunun temel esasları ve özellikle aydınlatılmış onam. Tıbbi müdahaleden kaynaklanan hukuki sorumluluk. Sempozyum Bildiri Kitabı [Physician’s liability to disclosure and receive patient’s consent]. Ankara: Mersin Barosu; 2009. p. 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Doğan M. Hekimin hukuki sorumluluğu. Tıbbi müdahaleden kaynaklanan hukuki sorumluluk. Sempozyum Bildiri Kitabı [Civil liabilities of the physician. Liabilities arising from medical interventions]. Ankara: Mersin Barosu; 2009. p. 41–60.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hakeri H. Tıp Hukuku (medical jurisprudance). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık; 2007. p. 93–185, 289–388.

    Google Scholar 

  7. TC. Yargıtay 13. Hukuk Dairesi Esas No:2013/23012 Karar No:2014/22561. http://www.hukukmedeniyeti.org/ictihatyazdir.asp?id=612. Accessed 20 Apr 2017.

  8. World Medical Association. Statement on medical malpractice. Santiago: WMA; 2005. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/20archives/m2/index.html. Accessed 20 Apr 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Türk Tabipleri Birliği. Aydınlatılmış Onam Kılavuzu (Turkish Medical Association. Informed consent manual). Madde 26. 2013. http://www.ttb.org.tr/mevzuat/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=983:onam&Itemid=65. Accessed 18 Apr 2017.

  10. Buzzacchi L, Scellato G, Ughetto E. Frequency of medical malpractice claims: the effects of volumes and specialties. Soc Sci Med. 2016;170:152–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Üzün İ, Özdemir E, Melez İE, Melez DO, Akçakaya A. Evaluation of medical malpractice in emergency and elective general surgery cases resulting in death. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2016;22:365–73. https://doi.org/10.5505/tjtes.2015.26543.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. http://www.medimagazin.com.tr/ana-sayfa/kategorisiz/tr-guatr-ameliyati-sonrasi-olum-davasi-1-666-3460.html. Accessed 18 Apr 2017.

  13. Hakeri H. Yargıtayın Aydınlatma Konusundaki Son Kararı ve Bu Kararın Sonuçları (Final decision by the Supreme Court on disclosure and its outcomes). http://www.medimagazin.com.tr/authors/hakan-hakeri/tr-yargitayin-aydinlatma-konusundaki-son-karari-ve-bu-kararin-sonuclari-72-64-1815.html. Accessed 05 Jan 2017.

  14. Dralle H, Schneider R, Lorenz K, Phuong NT, Sekulla C, Machens A. Vocal cord paralysis after thyroid surgery: current medicolegal aspects of intraoperative neuromonitorin. Chirurg. 2015;86:698–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-015-0033-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Singer MC, Iverson KC, Terris DJ. Thyroidectomy-related malpractice claims. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;146(3):358–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599811430898.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Karakaya MA, Koç O, Ekiz F, Ağaçhan AF, Göret NE. İstanbul Adli Tıp Kurumu tarafından 2008-21012 yılları arasında tiroidektomi sırasında gelişen rekürren laringeal sinir yaralanmaları nedeni ile verilen bilirkişi kararlarının irdelenmesi (Evaluation of expert reports provided by the Institution of Forensic Medicine (IFM) for recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis during thyroidectomy between 2008-2012). Ulus Cerrahi Derg. 2016;32:43–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Erkol Z, Ertan A, Gökdoğan C, Kadıoğlu P, Yavuz N, Erkol H, et al. İstenmeyen Sonuçlar Gelişmesi Nedeniyle Dava Konusu Olan Tiroidektomi Olgularının Retrospektif Değerlendirilmesi (retrospective evaluation of thyroidectomy incidences in dispute due to unwanted outcomes). Türkiye Klinikleri J Med. 2012;32:130–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tümer AR. Tıp mensupları için hukuki yönleri ile adli bilirkişilik (Forensic expertise for medical proffesionals). İstanbul: Matsis Matbaa; 2013. p. 13–6, 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hanson M, Pitt D. Informed consent for surgery: risk discussion and documentation. Can J Surg. 2017;60(1):69–70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Childress JF, Beauchamp TL. The concept of autonomy and the principle of respect of autonomy. In: Childress JF, Beauchamp TL, editors. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford; 2013. p. 101–14.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Childress JF, Beauchamp TL. The capacity of autonomous choice. In: Childress JF, Beauchamp TL, editors. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford; 2013. p. 114–20.

    Google Scholar 

  22. http://hastahukuku.com/yargitayk.php?recordID. Accessed 05 Jan 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Akça, T., Gamsız Bilgin, N. (2019). Malpractise and Ethical Violations in Thyroid Surgery. In: Özülker, T., Adaş, M., Günay, S. (eds) Thyroid and Parathyroid Diseases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78476-2_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78476-2_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78475-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78476-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics