Skip to main content

The Accesses to Oneself

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 466 Accesses

Abstract

The failure of a way of conceiving and grasping man’s being starting from the question of what that being is exactly (the paradigm of production) calls for an ontology capable of thematizing the guiding idea of man that has shaped the development of psychology and psychotherapy. What is suggested, then, is the outlining of a new perspective on man’s being, which is to say, of an ontology—that is phenomenological in its method of inquiry—capable of conceptualizing the incompleteness of existence. Phenomenological ontology thus presents psychology and psychotherapy with a new positum, ipseity, and, hence a new method to study it, formal indication. The chapter explores the impact of this ontology in creating a paradigm shift in psychology and therapeutic practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The young Heidegger wrote: “both the life-content of non-theoretical life and the what-contents of the material consideration always present themselves in a particular way in a ‘how’ and factically an intensifying-concentration (Zugespitztheit) upon the factical self-life of particular, many, whole generations is found in life, just as factically as the what-diversity of the subject-areas. This intensifying-concentration is not a what-content, but rather a how-content, in which each still so varied what- content can stand” (p. 67–68, (84–85) Heidegger GA 58).

  2. 2.

    The phenomenological method—which is a specific method and hence one devoid and independent of any predefined thematic area—has enabled ontology to bring to light the structures of being in general. This method, then—which is not a particular philosophical discipline—allows us to reveal what is concealed and what withdraws itself from manifestation (Sheehan 2014).

  3. 3.

    From this perspective, the various categories can be regarded as modes of being of life. A similar view was adopted by Peirce (Gethmann 1993 p. 272 ff.).

  4. 4.

    In discussing Lask’s influence on the young Heidegger, Kiesel notes “The relation of form to its matter is thus one of ‘environment’ (Umgebung). Matter is encompassed, embraced (umgriffen) surrounded or environed (umgeben), horizoned or bordered (verbrämt) by the form; it is enveloped (humhullt) enclosed (umschlessen) in the form” (2008, p. 53). As evidence of this radical departure from the neo-Kantian tradition to which Lask belonged, Kiesel mentions in the letter in which Lask informed Husserl that his master Rickert was accusing him of a “reactionary regression to antiquity.” Rickert was here referring to the proximity of Lask’s thought to that of Aristotle, who was seen as having abandoned the idealism of Plato in order to situate “forms” in “matter itself.”

  5. 5.

    Greisch notes “It is easy to see how this de-historicization makes accessing the concept of objective history possible” (p. 45, 2000).

  6. 6.

    Heidegger will therefore seek to develop a conceptuality indicative of facticity through impersonal phrases: “It’s worlding, It’s contextualizing, It’s properizing, It’s destining (indicating unique directions of sense and sending us on our way), It’s temporalizing, It’s tensing the stretch and reach of my temporal playing field, It’s propriating my proper being and proper time” (p. 50 Kisiel 2008).

  7. 7.

    “The self, in the present actualization of the experience of life, the self in the experiencing of itself, is the original reality” (GA 59 p. 173).

  8. 8.

    See § 77 Sein und Zeit (GA 2).

  9. 9.

    In dir, mein Geist, messe ich die Zeiten; dich messe ich, so ich die Zeit messe… In dir,sage ich immer wieder, messe ich die Zeit; die vorübergehend begegnenden Dinge bringen dich in eine Befindlichkeit, die bleibt, wahrend jene verschwinden. Die Befindlichkeit messe ich in dem gegenwartigen Dasein, nicht die Dinge, welche vorübergehen, dass sie erst entstünde. Mein Mich-befinden selbst, ich wiederhole es, messe ich, wenn ich die Zeit messe (GA 64, p. 111). In te, anime meus, tempora metior…In te, inquam, tempora metior;affectionem quam res praetereuntes in te faciunt, et cum illae praeterierint manet, ipsam metior presentem,non eas quae praeterierunt ut fieret:ipsam metior, cum tempora metior” (Book 11, ch. 27.36).

  10. 10.

    The latest example of this mode of operating in psychotherapy is Guidano’s techno-constructivism, which translates Natorp’s reflections into a technical instrument, the “moviola” method. In the light of the orienting principles adopted in order to access the past, the “application” of this method to the flowing of memories slows down the sequences of images, making it possible to study them and bring them into focus through individual frames, as though lived experience were present and available to one’s consciousness.

  11. 11.

    In mathematical analysis, the integral is an operator which, in the case of a single-variable function, associates the function with the area bounded by its graph within a given interval (a, b) in the domain.

References

  • Arciero G (2006) Sulle tracce di sé. Bollati Boringhieri, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrien, Sophie-Jan. 2009. Natorp et Heidegger: Une science originaire est-elle possible? In Jollivet, S., & Romano, C. Heidegger en dialogue (1912-1930). Rencontres, affinités, confrontations, Paris, Vrin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambach CR (1993) Phenomenological research as destruktion the early Heidegger’s reading of Dilthey. Philos Today 37(2):115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer HG (1975) Truth and method (1960). Crossroad, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gethmann CF (1993) Dasein: Erkennen und Handeln: Heidegger im phänomenologischen Kontext, vol 3. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Greisch J (2000) L’Arbre de vie et l’Arbre du savoir.: Le chemin phénoménologique de l’herméneutique heideggérienne (1919-1923). Cerf, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidano VF (1991) The self in process: toward a post-rationalist cognitive therapy. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly G (2003) The psychology of personal constructs: volume two: clinical diagnosis and psychotherapy. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kisiel T (2008) On the genesis of Heidegger’s formally indicative hermeneutics of facticity. In: Raffoul F, Nelson ES (eds) Rethinking Facticity. State University of New York Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Natorp P (1912) Allgemeine Psychologie nach kritischer Methode, vol 1. JCB Mohr (P. Siebeck), Tubingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1972) Objective knowledge: an evolutionary approach. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Quesne P (2004) Les recherches philosophiques du jeune Heidegger, vol 171. Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan T (2014) Making sense of Heidegger: a paradigm shift. Rowman & Littlefield International, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Glasersfeld E (1995) Radical constructivism: a way of knowing and learning, Studies in mathematics education series, vol 6. Falmer Press, Taylor & Francis, Bristol

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arciero, G., Bondolfi, G., Mazzola, V. (2018). The Accesses to Oneself. In: The Foundations of Phenomenological Psychotherapy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78087-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78087-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78086-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78087-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics