Skip to main content

The Fine Line between Stupid and Clever: An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mockumentary Comedy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Comedy ((PSCOM))

  • 1202 Accesses

Abstract

Mockumentary Comedy begins with a chapter that puts forward the view that comedy has been neglected as a key mode of mockumentary expression in existing scholarship, and that definitions of what constitutes a mockumentary text appear increasingly narrow as the form continues to evolve. This chapter positions the book within the existing critical field and suggests that by studying comedy, and particularly the comic performance of both actors and of the stylistic features of the documentary, mockumentary comedy makes visible the constructed aspects of non-fiction forms of audio-visual media, and the performances of public figures in everyday life. The case is also made for focusing on the rock star and the politician as case studies elsewhere in the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Letter from Leonard Miall to David Wheeler, 5 April 1957, BBC WAC T32/1,218/1: ‘Panorama: tx.57.04’.

  2. 2.

    ‘Telegrams to Mr. Richard Dimbleby relating to remarks about spaghetti in Panorama—2.4.57’, ibid.

  3. 3.

    Surprisingly, Craig Hight does not make a single mention of The Thick of It in his book-length study of the television mockumentary. Roscoe and Hight’s book was published before the show was first broadcast.

  4. 4.

    I’m Alan Partridge is the first show to exhibit writer and producer Armando Iannucci’s mockumentary style which he claims (in the 2009 documentary This is Spinal Tap: Up to 11) is directly influenced by the mockumentary style of Spinal Tap . Partridge (Steve Coogan) himself, in the in-character commentary on the DVD release of I’m Alan Partridge, suggests that the show is not a documentary but a re-enactment of things that really happened to him, filmed in a documentary style (Partridge 2002).

  5. 5.

    The omission of the apostrophe in the title of Dont Look Back is deliberate. As Dave Saunders argues, it ‘exhibits a typically counter-cultural disregard for formalised language’ (2007: 59) and Pennebaker himself has suggested that it was an attempt to ‘simplify the language’ (Sounes 2002: 208) in line with the experimental nature of direct cinema documentary filmmaking. This has also become the accepted way of referring to the film in academic work. See for example Saunders (2010) and Beattie (2016).

  6. 6.

    For more on The War Game’s suppression, see Garnham (1972), Tracey (1982), Cook and Murphy (2000), Murphy (2003) and Chapman (2006).

  7. 7.

    It also won the 1966 Academy Award for Best Documentary which poses its own set of questions.

  8. 8.

    To these we could also add episodes of C.S.I.: Crime Scene Investigation (2005–2015), The Simpsons (1989–) and The West Wing (1999–2006) among many others.

  9. 9.

    Given Linehan’s statement, it is ironic that the initial treatment of the sitcom Father Ted, written in 1990, was for a one-off mockumentary comedy. In Small, Far Away: The World of Father Ted, a 2011 documentary on the making of the show, Declan Lowney, one of its directors, acknowledged that it was a script that ‘was never going to be commissioned by anybody’, perhaps signalling that in hindsight 1990 was slightly too early for a mainstream mockumentary project. In the end, comedy producer Geoffrey Perkins suggested it be turned into a standard sitcom.

  10. 10.

    For an account of how this works in practice, see Morson’s (1979) work on framing in Orson Welles’s ‘War of the Worlds’ broadcast.

References

  • Anon (2004), ‘Still a Good Joke—47 Years On’, BBC News, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/southern_counties/3591687.stm, accessed 6 March 2017.

  • ——— (2005), ‘1957: Spaghetti fools’, BBC: On this Day, http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/witness/april/1/newsid_4362000/4362667.stm, accessed 6 March 2017.

  • Bates, Peter (1989), ‘Truth Not Guaranteed: An Interview with Errol Morris’, Cineaste, 17(1), pp. 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, Gerd (2006), ‘Artifice and Artificiality in Mockumentaries’, in Gary D. Rhodes and John Parris Springer (eds.), Docufictions: Essays on the Intersection of Documentary and Fictional Filmmaking, Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc., pp. 164–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, Keith (2008), Documentary Display: Re-viewing Nonfiction Film and Video, London; New York: Wallflower Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2016), Dont Look Back, London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter, and Asja Lacis (1925), ‘Naples’, in Walter Benjamin (ed.), (1978), Reflections: Essays, Aphorisms, Autobiographical Writings, edited by Peter Demetz and translated by Edmund Jephcott, New York: Schocken Books, pp. 163–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, David, Janet Staiger, and Kristin Thompson (1988), The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style & Mode of Production to 1960, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brassett, James, and Alex Sutton (2017), ‘British Satire, Everyday Politics: Chris Morris, Armando Iannucci and Charlie Brooker’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(2), pp. 245–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadcasting Act 1981, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1981/68, accessed 22 September 2017.

  • Bruzzi, Stella (2006), New Documentary (Second Edition), Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith (1990), Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Noël (1991), ‘Notes on the Sight Gag’, in Andrew S. Horton (ed.), Comedy/Cinema/Theory, Berkeley, Los Angeles and Oxford: University of California Press, pp. 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caughie, John (1980), ‘Progressive Television and Documentary Drama’, Screen, 21(3), pp. 9–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2000), Television Drama: Realism, Modernism, and British Culture, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, James (2006), ‘The BBC and the Censorship of the War Games (1965)’, Journal of Contemporary History, 41(1), pp. 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, Jane (2009), Issues in Contemporary Documentary, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, John (2017), ‘Who Banned The War Game? A Fifty-year Controversy Reassessed’, Journal of British Cinema and Television, 14(1), pp. 39–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— and Patrick Murphy (2000), ‘After the Bomb Dropped: The Cinema Half-life of The War Game’, The Journal of Popular British Cinema, 3, pp. 129–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, John (1996), The Art of Record, Manchester; New York: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2002), ‘Performing the Real: Documentary Diversions’, Television and New Media, 3(3), pp. 255–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottle, Simon (2004), ‘Producing Nature(s): On the Changing Production Ecology of Natural History TV’, Media, Culture & Society, 26(1), pp. 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defoe, Daniel ([1719] 2007), Robinson Crusoe, edited by Thomas Keymer, Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty, Thomas (2003), ‘The Sincerest Form of Flattery: A Brief History of the Mockumentary’, Cineaste, 28(4), pp. 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, Raymond (1972), The American Newsreel 1911–1967, Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, Bryan (1964), ‘Dr Strangelove Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb’, Film and Filming, 10(5), p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francke, Lizzie (2006), ‘When Documentary is Not Documentary’, in Mark Cousins and Kevin Macdonald (eds.), Imagining Reality: The Faber Book of Documentary, London: Faber and Faber, pp. 338–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Alastair H., Andrew Robertshaw, and Steve Roberts (2009), Ghosts on the Somme—Filming the Battle June–July 1916, Barnsley: Pen & Sword Military.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, Nicholas (1972), ‘TV Documentary and Ideology’, Screen, 13(2), pp. 109–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitelman, Lisa (2008), Always Already New: Media, History and the Data of Culture, Cambridge, MA; London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving (1959), The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1974), Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grierson, John (1933), ‘The Documentary Producer’, Cinema Quarterly, Autumn, pp. 7–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hight, Craig (2010), Television Mockumentary: Reflexivity, Satire and a Call to Play, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2013a), ‘Filmography’, Mockumentary: Reflexivity, Satire and a Call to Play, http://www.waikato.ac.nz/film/mock-doc.shtml, archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20130413010901/http://www.waikato.ac.nz/film/mock-doc.shtml, accessed 18 September 2017.

  • ——— (2013b), ‘Mocking the News: The Day Today and Brass Eye as Mockumentary News Satire’, in James Leggott and Jamie Sexton (eds.), No Known Cure: The Comedy of Chris Morris, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 53–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Annette (2008), ‘Documentary Modes of Engagement’, in Thomas Austin and Wilma de Jong (eds.), Rethinking Documentary: New Perspectives, New Practices, Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp. 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, Andrew (1991), ‘Introduction’, in Andrew Horton (ed.), Comedy/Cinema/Theory, Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Issari, M. Ali, and Doris A. Paul (1979), What is Cinéma Vérité? Metuchen, NJ: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Henry, and Kristine Brunovska Karnick (1995), ‘Introduction: Acting Funny’, in Kristine Brunovska Karnick and Henry Jenkins (eds.), Classical Hollywood Comedy, New York; London: Routledge, pp. 149–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juhasz, Alexandra, and Jesse Lerner (2006), ‘Introduction: Phony Definitions and Troubling Taxonomies of the Fake Documentary’, in Alexandra Juhasz and Jesse Lerner (eds.), F is For Phony: Fake Documentary and Truth’s Undoing, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leggott, James, and Jamie Sexton (2013), No Known Cure: The Comedy of Chris Morris, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, Richard (2002), Panorama: Fifty Years of Pride and Paranoia, London: Politico’s Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linehan, Graham (2011), ‘Is EVERY new American sitcom a mock-documentary? Sheesh!’, Twitter, 4 February 2011, https://twitter.com/Glinner/status/33625260112740352, accessed 19 June 2017.

  • Marquis, Elizabeth (2013), ‘Conceptualizing Documentary Performance’, Studies in Documentary Film, 7(1), pp. 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mast, Gerald (1973), The Comic Mind: Comedy and the Movies, London: New English Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mast, Jelle (2009), ‘New Directions in Hybrid Popular Television: A Reassessment of Television Mock-documentary’, Media, Culture & Society, 31(2), pp. 231–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meikle, Graham (2012), ‘“Find Out Exactly What to Think-Next!”: Chris Morris, Brass Eye, and Journalistic Authority’, Popular Communication, 10(1/2), pp. 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, Jason (2002), ‘Documentary Comedy’, Media International Australia incorporating Culture and Policy, 104, pp. 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2014), Documentary’s Awkward Turn: Cringe Comedy and Media Spectatorship, New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Cynthia J. (2009a), ‘Introduction: At Play in the Fields of the Truth’, Post Script: Essays in Film and the Humanities, 28(3), pp. 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2009b), ‘Mockumentary Filmography’, Post Script: Essays in Film and the Humanities, 28(3), pp. 134–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2012a), ‘Introduction’, in Cynthia J. Miller (ed.), Too Bold for the Box Office: The Mockumentary from Big Screen to Small, Lanham; Toronto; Plymouth: The Scarecrow Press, Inc., pp. xi–xxii.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (ed.) (2012b), Too Bold for the Box Office: The Mockumentary from Big Screen to Small, Lanham; Toronto; Plymouth: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Brett (2004), ‘Comedy Verite: Contemporary Sitcom Form’, Screen, 45(1), pp. 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2005), Television Sitcom, London: British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morson, Gary Saul (1979), ‘The War of the Well(e)s’, Journal of Communication, 29(3), pp. 10–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Patrick (2003), ‘The War Game—The Controversy’, Film International, 3, pp. 25–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, Bill (1991), Representing Reality: Issues and Concepts in Documentary, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2001), Introduction to Documentary, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paget, Derek (2011), No Other Way to Tell It: Docudrama on Film and Television, Second Edition, Manchester; New York: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Jerry (1987), The Logic of the Absurd: On Film and Television Comedy, London: BFI Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, Alan (2002), DVD audio commentary: I’m Alan Partridge: Series 1, 2 Entertain Video, UK, ASIN: B00007DWNK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, Lucian (2008), Disgusting Bliss: Chris Morris and the Rebirth of Satire, London: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, Jane (2000), ‘The Blair Witch Project: Mock-documentary Goes Mainstream’, Jump Cut, 43, pp. 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— and Craig Hight (2001), Faking It: Mock-documentary and the Subversion of Factuality, Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, Dave (2007), Direct Cinema: Observational Documentary and the Politics of the Sixties, London and New York: Wallflower Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2010), Documentary, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Seife, Ethan (2007), This is Spinal Tap, London: Wallflower Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sounes, Howard (2002), Down the Highway: The Life of Bob Dylan, London: Black Swan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springer, John Parris, and Gary D. Rhodes (2006), ‘Introduction’, in Gary D. Rhodes and John Parris Springer (eds.), Docufictions: Essays on the Intersection of Documentary and Fictional Filmmaking, Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company, Inc., pp. 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, Alasdair Scott (2009), The Spaghetti Tree: Mario and Franco and the Trattoria Revolution, London: Primavera Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Ethan (2007), ‘Comedy Verité? The Observational Documentary Meets the Televisual Sitcom’, Velvet Light Trap, 60, pp. 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, Michael (1982), ‘Censored: The War Game Story’, in Aubrey Crispen (ed.), Nukespeak: The Media and the Bomb, London: Comedia, pp. 38–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, Ben (2005), The Office, London: British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Paul (2005), Documentary: The Margins of Reality, London: Wallflower Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waugh, Thomas (2011), ‘Acting to Play Oneself’, in Thomas Waugh (ed.), The Right to Play Oneself: Looking Back on Documentary Film, Minneapolis, MN; London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weitz, Eric (2009), The Cambridge Introduction to Comedy, Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond (1989), ‘Drama in a Dramatised Society’, in Alan O’Connor (ed.), Raymond Williams on Television: Selected Writings, London: Routledge, pp. 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, Brian (1993), ‘The Documentary Film as Scientific Inscription’, in Michael Renov (ed.), Theorizing Documentary, New York; London: Routledge, pp. 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1999), ‘Documentary: How the Myth Was Deconstructed’, Wide Angle, 21(2), pp. 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2008), Claiming the Real II—Documentary: Grierson and Beyond (Second Edition), London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wallace, R. (2018). The Fine Line between Stupid and Clever: An Introduction. In: Mockumentary Comedy. Palgrave Studies in Comedy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77848-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics