Abstract
The Maker movement represents a return of interest to the physical side of digital innovation. To explore expectations and values within the Maker movement, we applied qualitative research method, interviewing 10 managers of maker initiative as well as 39 makers from eight different countries. The paper analyses how the Maker movement is contributing to a change in production, logistics and supply chains and how it changes the relationship between producer and consumer. Based on the interview data and supported by literature, the study indicates that the Maker movement has the potential to impact producer-consumer relationships in many ways. Making, on a bigger scale would mean producing locally, de-centralised and on-demand. This would have an impact on the logistics and the supply chain. Long transportation routes would be avoided and shorter supply chains would make some of the-in-between vendors obsolete. Makers as prosumers, who produce for themselves, are introducing two growing phenomena: a more personalised relationship between maker and object and personalised products as a form of self-expression.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gershenfeld, N.: Bits and atom. Presented at the 2005 International Conference on Digital Printing Technologies (2005)
Voigt, C., Montero, C.S., Menichinelli, M.: An empirically informed taxonomy for the maker movement. In: Bagnoli, F., Satsiou, A., Stavrakakis, I., Nesi, P., Pacini, G., Welp, Y., Tiropanis, T., DiFranzo, D. (eds.) INSCI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9934, pp. 189–204. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45982-0_17
Bria, F., Almirall, E., Baeck, P., Halpin, H., Kingsbury, J., Kresin, F., et al.: Digital social innovation interim report. Nesta, London (2014)
Unterfrauner, E., Voigt, C.: Makers’ ambitions to do socially valuable things. Des. J. 20(Sup1), S3317–S3325 (2017)
Watson, R.T., Boudreau, M.-C., Chen, A.J.: Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: energy informatics and new directions for the IS community. MIS Q. 34(1), 23–38 (2010)
Brettel, M., Friederichsen, N., Keller, M., Rosenberg, M.: How virtualization, decentralization and network building change the manufacturing landscape: an industry 4.0 perspective. Int. J. Mech. Ind. Sci. Eng. 8, 37–44 (2014)
Churchman, C.W.: Philosophical speculations on systems design. Omega 2, 451–465 (1974)
Dougherty, D.: The maker movement. Innovations 7, 11–14 (2012)
Silverman, D.: Qualitative Research. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2016)
Flick, U.: An Introduction to Qualitative Research. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2014)
Millard, J.: D2.2 monitoring and assessment framework (2016)
Mayring, P.: Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken. Beltz Verlag, Weinheim und Basel (2010)
Reichertz, J.: Abduktion, Deduktion und Induktion in der qualitativen Sozialforschung. In: Flick, U., von Kardoff, E., Steinke, I. (eds.) Qualitative Forschung, pp. 276–285. Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Hamburg (2012)
Bianchini, M., Menichinelli, M., Maffei, S., Bombardi, F., Carosi, A.: Makers’ Inquiry. Un’indagine socioeconomica sui makers italiani e su Make in Italy. Milano: Libraccio Editore (2015). http://makersinquiry.org
Unterfrauner, E., Schrammel, M., Hofer, M., Fabian, C.M., Voigt, C., Deljanin, S.R., Sorivelle, M.N., Devoldere, B., Haga, H.: Final case study report focusing on cross-case analysis (2017)
Hughner, R.S., McDonagh, P., Prothero, A., Shultz II, C.J., Stanton, J.: Who are organic food consumers? a compilation and review of why people purchase organic food. J. Consum. Behav. 6(2–3), 94–110 (2007)
Kohtala, C.: Addressing sustainability in research on distributed production: an integrated literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 106, 654–668 (2015)
Osunyomi, B.D., Redlich, T., Buxbaum-Conradi, S., Moritz, M., Wulfsberg, J.P.: Impact of the fablab ecosystem in the sustainable value creation process. OIDA Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 9(1), 21–36 (2016)
Lacy, P., Rutqvist, J.: Waste to Wealth: The Circular Economy Advantage. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137530707
Joore, J.P.: New to Improve – The Mutual Influence Between New Products and Societal Change Processes. VSSD, Delft (2010)
Nascimento, S.: Critical notions of technology and the promises of empowerment in shared machine shops. J. Peer Prod. 5 (2014)
Voigt, C., Unterfrauner, E., Stelzer, R.: Diversity in fablabs: culture, role models and the gendering of making. In: Kompatsiaris, I., Cave, J., Satsiou, A., Carle, G., Passani, A., Kontopoulos, E., Diplaris, S., McMillan, D. (eds.) INSCI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10673, pp. 52–68. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_5
Acknowledgements
The study has been conducted with the support of the European Commission in the framework of the Horizon2020 Project MAKE-IT (GA 688241). For further information: www.make-it.io.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Unterfrauner, E., Voigt, C., Schrammel, M., Menichinelli, M. (2018). The Maker Movement and the Disruption of the Producer-Consumer Relation. In: Diplaris, S., Satsiou, A., Følstad, A., Vafopoulos, M., Vilarinho, T. (eds) Internet Science. INSCI 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10750. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77547-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77547-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77546-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77547-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)