Skip to main content

Larraín’s No: A Tale of Neoliberalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Latin American Cinema

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the case of the film No (Pablo Larraín, 2012), drawing on the results of a long-term multi-sited ethnography of the Chilean field of film production. Accused of being both reactionary and a piece of left-wing propaganda, the film motivated an unprecedented public debate about the experience of neoliberalism in Chile and its relation to film production. This chapter explores this national reception, considering the film’s conditions of production and circulation, its narrative of historical events and the local expectations for Chilean political cinema. It argues that No has an ambiguous and complex relationship with neoliberalism, which highlights the contradictory nature of the Chilean field of film production as it has been increasingly professionalized and internationalized under the logics of late capitalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Works Cited

  • Anderson, Benedict. 2004. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronczyk, Melissa, and Devin Powers. 2010. Blowing Up the Brand: Critical Perspectives on Promotional Culture. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson-Allott, Caetelin. 2013. “An Illusion Appropriate to the Conditions: No (Pablo Larraín, 2012).” Film Quarterly 66 (3): 61–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc, and Eve Chiapello. 2005. “The New Spirit of Capitalism.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 18 (3): 161–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bongers, Wolfang. 2010. “Archivo, cine, política: Imágenes latentes, restos y rspectros en films argentinos y chilenos.” Aisthesis 48: 66–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Wendy. 2005. Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CAEM. 2014. El cine en Chile en el 2013. Cámara de exhibidores multisalas de Chile A.G. [Online]. Available from: http://www.caem.cl/. Accessed December 13, 2016.

  • Cavallo, Ascanio. 2013. “No somos las estrellas del mundo.” Revista Capital [Online], December 14, 2013. Available from: http://www.capital.cl. Accessed December 13, 2016.

  • Cavallo, Ascanio, and Gonzalo Maza. 2011. El novísimo cine chileno. Santiago: Uqbar.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Valck, Marijke. 2007. Film Festivals: From European Geopolitics to Global Cinephilia. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Emol. “‘No’ según M.A. Garretón: “Es la basura ideológica más grande que he visto.” Emol.com, August 22, 2012. Accessed December 13, 2016. http://www.emol.com/noticias/magazine/2012/08/23/557085/manuel-antonio-garreton-contra-la-pelicula-no.html.

  • Galt, Rosalind, and Karl Schoonover. 2010. “Introduction: The Impurity of Art Cinema.” In Global Art Cinema: New Theories and Histories, edited by Rosalind Galt and Karl Schoonover, 3–27. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higson, Andrew. 2000. “The Limiting Imagination of National Cinema.” In Cinema and Nation, edited by Mette Hjort and Scott MacKenzie, 57–68. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iordanova, Dina, and Ragan Rhyne. 2009. The Festival Circuit. St. Andrews: St. Andrews Film Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iordanova, Dina, David Martin-Jones, and Belén Vidal. 2010. Cinema at the Periphery. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, Jyotsna, and Keith Wagner. 2011. Neoliberalism and Global Cinema: Capital, Culture, and Marxist Critique. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Naomi. 2008. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Fred. 2001. The Empire of Things: Regimes of Value and Material Culture. Oxford: James Currey Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, Joanna. 2017. “Affect and Self‐Authorship in Contemporary Chilean Cinema.” In A Companion to Latin American Cinema, edited by María Delgado, Stephen Hart, and Randal Johnson, 269–84. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peirano, María Paz. 2015. “Contemporary Chilean Cinema: Film Practices and Narratives of National Cinema within the Chilean Film Community.” PhD diss., University of Kent, Canterbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirano, María Paz. 2018. “Film Mobilities and Circulation Practices in the Construction of Recent Chilean Cinema.” In Envisioning Networked Urban Mobilities: Art, Performances, Impacts, edited by Aslak Aamot Kjærulff, Peter Peters and Kevin Hannam, 135–47. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, Iván. 2009. “Cine, política, memoria. Nuevos entramados en el documental chileno.” Revista La Fuga [Online]. Available from: http://www.lafuga.cl/. Accessed June 20, 2014.

  • Pinto, Iván, and Luis Horta. 2010. “Vías no realizadas en el cine político chileno: Parodia, extrañamiento y reflexividad.” Aisthesis 47: 128–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saavedra, Carlos. 2013. Intimidades desencantadas: la poética cinematográfica del dos mil. Santiago: Cuarto Propio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trejo, Roberto. 2009. Cine, neoliberalismo y cultura: crítica de la economía política del cine chileno contemporáneo. Santiago: ARCIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • UPI Chile. “Moreira por críticas a película NO: ‘Respeto el cine chileno, pero esta cinta es tendenciosa’.” El mostrador. September 25, 2012. Accessed December 13, 2016. http://www.elmostrador.cl/noticias/pais/2012/09/25/moreira-por-cuestionamientos-a-pelicula-no-respeto-el-cine-chileno-pero-esta-cinta-es-tendenciosa/.

  • Urrutia, Carolina. 2010. “Hacia una política en tránsito: Ficción en el cine chileno (2008–2010).” Aisthesis 47: 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urrutia, Carolina. 2011. “Post Mortem y Tony Manero. Memoria centrifugada de un pasado político.” Cinémas d’Amerique Latine 19: 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urrutia, Carolina. 2013. Un cine centrífugo: ficciones chilenas 2005–2010. Santiago: Cuarto Propio.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Peirano, M.P. (2018). Larraín’s No: A Tale of Neoliberalism. In: Sandberg, C., Rocha, C. (eds) Contemporary Latin American Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77010-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics