Abstract
The region of eastern Tibet is composed of two traditional Tibetan areas, Amdo and Kham, known together as Do Kham. The environmental parameters of this broad region and the variety of pastoralist practices available reveal that the choice to practice nomadic pastoralism is not dictated solely by physical limits. Also important is how Tibetan nomadic pastoralists self-identify as drogpa, or people of the pastures. This chapter introduces the ethnographic setting of the book by providing a general description of Tibetan nomadic pastoralists, their social organization, way of life, movements across pastures, daily labor, and relationships with animals, the environment, and others, including Tibetan farmers, monasteries, and traders. An emic perspective emphasizes the relationships as drelwa that Tibetan nomadic pastoralists have with animals, human others, and nonhuman others. These relationships are nonetheless framed according to categories of value and meaning provided by Tibetan cosmology. This sets a foundation from which to appreciate that change must be understood in its complexity not only through evidence of material products that indicate change but also through analysis of relationships that have altered.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
As distinct from the wild yak (Bos mutus). The domesticated variety is the one referred to throughout this book.
- 2.
Horses and dogs are also household animals although their functions are quite different and they are not herded.
- 3.
This latter term sounds like another term, dzo, which is used to refer to yak-cow hybrids.
- 4.
Increasingly, the limit of herd sizes is being dictated by the Chinese state . This is discussed in more detail in Chap. 3.
- 5.
Nonetheless, Tibetan pastoralists will never talk about their family structure in this way and will care unstintingly for any ill relative.
- 6.
Markers of wealth are found in the size and health of the herd and manifest within the household in less tangible ways. In the home of a wealthy household, a pastoralist would look around and comment that it was wealthy, noting the wood and the size and number of poles of the house . Other markers of wealth included sacks of barley and the offer of fresh butter, and meat. The orderliness of space and the constant supply of fresh butter, meat and treats in some households were the visible indications of a wealth otherwise roaming the grasslands.
- 7.
Refer to Manderscheid (2000) for a discussion on the eastern distribution of the black tent. In Dzamthang County, Aba Prefecture, where she conducted her fieldwork, what she noted as the sbra-nag is similar to the nag tsang used in Dzachukha , Yushul and Golog. What she noted as the rtse-sbra is similar in shape to the sbra in Minyag, although the sbra of Minyag appears to be larger.
- 8.
Herding is one of the tasks performed by both women and men.
- 9.
More on traditional positions is detailed in Chap. 5.
- 10.
The Tibetan word used was, gasar, literally meaning lover.
- 11.
Due to its increased importance to and effect on nomadic pastoralist communities, the topic of caterpillar fungus is treated separately, in Chap. 7.
- 12.
It does not include plants and flowers. In a statement about whether plants and flowers have life, Khenpo Sodargye concludes that they do not since they do not have ‘consciousness , sense, suffering and happiness coming from the six sense organs’. http://www.khenposodargye.org/posts-on-web/page/43/, accessed 30 September 2017. For a detailed account of the concept of life for Tibetan nomadic pastoralists, refer to Tan (2016).
- 13.
By referencing this term, I acknowledge the philosophical debates on dependent-origination. However, in this book, the primary reference is to how nomadic pastoralists use the term.
References
Aziz, B. (1978). Tibetan frontier families. Reflections on three generations from D’ingri. New Delhi: Vikas.
Bellezza, J. (2011). The liturgies and oracular utterances of spirit-mediums of Upper Tibet—An introduction to their bSangs rituals. Revue d’Études Tibétaines, 20, 5–31.
Cai, L. (1989). Yak of Sichuan. Chengdu: Sichuan Nationality Publishing House.
David-Néel, A. (1985). Mystiques et magiciens du Tibet. Paris: Plon. (Original work published 1929)
Ekvall, R. (1968). Fields on the hoof: Nexus of Tibetan nomadic pastoralism. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1940). The Nuer: A description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of a Nilotic people. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Galaty, J. (1981). Introduction. In J. Galaty & P. C. Salzman (Eds.), Change and development in nomadic and pastoral societies (pp. 4–26). Leiden: Brill.
Gardner, A. (2006). The twenty-five great sites of Khams: Religious geography, revelation, and non-sectarianism in nineteenth-century eastern Tibet. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
Gelek, L. (2002). The Washul Serthar: A nomadic community of eastern Tibet. Chinese Sociology and Anthropology, 35(1), 3–20.
Goldstein, M. C., & Beall, C. (1990). Nomads of Western Tibet: The survival of a way of life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Humchen (Lce nag tshang Hum chen). (2007). A brief introduction to Ngag dbang dar rgyas and the origin of Rnying ma order in Henan county (Sogpo), the Mongolian region of Amdo. In H. Diemberger & U. E. Bulag (Eds.), The Mongolia-Tibet interface: Opening new research terrains in Inner Asia (pp. 239–255). Leiden: Brill.
Irons, W. (1974). Nomadism as a political adaptation: The case of the Yomut Turkmen. American Ethnologist, 1(4), 635–658.
Jacoby, S. (2014). Love and liberation: Autobiographical writings of the Tibetan Buddhist visionary Sera Khandro. New York: Columbia University Press.
Karmay, S. G. (2003). Note sur l’origine des huit catégories d’esprits. Revue d’Études Tibétaines, 2, 67–80.
Levine, N. E. (1989). The dynamics of polyandry: Kinship, domesticity and population on the Tibetan border. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Long, R., et al. (2009). Case study 7: Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Rangelands. In V. R. Squires, X. Lu, Q. Lu, T. Wang, & Y. Yang (Eds.), Rangeland degradation and recovery in China’s pastoral lands. Oxfordshire: CAB International.
Makley, C. (2013). The politics of presence: Voice, deity possession, and dilemmas of development among Tibetans of the People’s Republic of China. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 55(3), 665–700.
Manderscheid, A. (2000). The black tent in its easternmost distribution: The case of the Tibetan Plateau. Mountain Research and Development, 21(2), 154–160.
Miller, D. J. (2000). Tough times for Tibetan nomads in western China: Snowstorms, settling down, fences and the demise of traditional nomadic pastoralism. Nomadic Peoples, 4(1), 83–109.
Norbu Rinpoche, N. (1997). Journey among the Tibetan nomads: An account of a remote civilization. Dharamsala: Library of Tibetan Works and Archives. (Original work published 1959)
Pirie, F. (2005a). Segmentation within the state: the reconfiguration of Tibetan tribes in China’s Reform Period. Nomadic Peoples, 9(1), 83–102.
Pirie, F. (2005b). Feuding, mediation and the negotiation of authority among the nomads of eastern Tibet. Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology (Working Papers No. 72).
Pirie, F. (2013). The limits of the state: Coercion and consent in Chinese Tibet. The Journal of Asian Studies, 72(1), 69–89.
Powers, J., & Templeman, D. (2012). Historical dictionary of Tibet. Langham: Scarecrow Press.
Qiu, Q., et al. (2011). The yak genome and adaptation to life at high altitude. Nature Genetics, 44(8), 946–951.
Sahlins, M. D. (1972). Stone age economics. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.
Sahlins, M. D. (1981). Historical metaphors and mythical realities: Structure in the early history of the Sandwich Islands kingdoms. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Sahlins, M. D. (1985). Islands of history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Salzman, P. C. (1972). Multi-resource nomadism in Iranian Baluchistan. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 7(1–2), 60–68.
Salzman, P. C. (1994). Baluchi Nomads in the market. In C. Chang & H. A. Koster (Eds.), Pastoralists at the periphery: Herders in a capitalist world (pp. 165–174). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.
Samuel, G. (2012). Introducing Tibetan Buddhism. Abingdon: Routledge.
Schaller, G., & Liu, W. (1996). Distribution, status and conservation of wild yak, Bos grunniens. Biological Conservation, 76(1), 1–8.
Schneider, N. (2016). The monastery in a Tibetan pastoralist context: A case study from Kham Minyag. Études Mongoles et Sibériennes, Centrasiatiques et Tibétaines (EMSCAT) 47. https://doi.org/10.4000/emscat.2798.
Sulek, E. R. (2016). Caterpillar fungus and the economy of sinning: On entangled relations between religious and economic in a Tibetan Pastoral Region of Golog, Qinghai, China. Études Mongoles et Sibériennes, Centrasiatiques et Tibétaines (EMSCAT) 47. https://doi.org/10.4000/emscat.2769.
Tan, G. G. (2016). ‘Life’ and ‘freeing life’ (tshe thar) among Pastoralists of Kham: Intersecting religion and environment. Études Mongoles et Sibériennes, Centrasiatiques et Tibétaines (EMSCAT) 47. https://doi.org/10.4000/emscat.2793.
Thar, T. (2003). Bonpo temples in sTong che. In S. G. Karmay & Y. Nagano (Eds.), A survey of Bonpo monasteries and temples in Tibet and the Himalaya. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.
Thar, T. (2008). Bonpo tantrics in Kokonor Area. Revue d’Études Tibétaines, 15, 533–552.
Thargyal, R. (2007). Nomads of Eastern Tibet: Social organization and economy of a pastoral estate in the kingdom of Dege. Leiden: Brill.
Wiener, G., Han, J., & Long, R. (2003). The yak (2nd ed.). Bangkok: FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.
Wu, N. (1998). Indigenous knowledge of yak breeding and cross-breeding among nomads in Western Sichuan, China. Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor, 6(1), 7–9.
Wu, J. (2016). The distributions of Chinese yak breeds in response to climate change over the past 50 years. Animal Science Journal, 87, 947–958.
Tibetan Language Sources
Dungkar, L. T. (2002). dung dkar cig mdzod chen mo. Beijing: China Tibetology Publishing House.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tan, G.G. (2018). Ethnographic Setting of Nomadic Pastoralism in Eastern Tibet. In: Pastures of Change. Studies in Human Ecology and Adaptation, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76553-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76553-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76552-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76553-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)