Skip to main content

The Assessment of Sociolinguistic Justice: Parameters and Models of Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language Policy and Linguistic Justice

Abstract

This paper argues that the assessment of sociolinguistic justice should pass through the promotion of linguistic ease, analysed through a number of sociolinguistic parameters already used for the repertoires of multilingual communities. Their consideration permits to tackle the complexity of globalising and localising forces, beyond the Westphalian model of nation-state. In particular, three axes of analysis should be taken into account: the formality of situations, the sense of belonging, and special domains, like school and writing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alcalde, J. (2015). Linguistic justice: an interdisciplinary overview of the literature. A’dam Multiling, 3, 27–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcalde, J. (2018). Linguistic justice: an interdisciplinary overview of the literature. In M. Gazzola, T. Templin, & B.-A. Wickström (Eds.), Language policy and linguistic justice (pp. 65–149). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ammon, U., Dittmar, N., Mattheier, K. J., & Trudgill, P. (Eds.). (2006/2008). Sociolinguistics/Soziolinguistik. An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society/Ein internationales Handbuch zur Wissenschaft von Sprache und Gesellschaft (Vol. 3, II ed.). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastardas i Boada, A. (2010). Language and identity policies in the ‘glocal’ age: New processes, effect, and principles of organization. Barcelona: Institut d’Estudis Autonòmics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaulac, S. (2004). The westphalian model in defining international law: Challenging the myth. Australian Journal of Legal History, 9, 181–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berruto, G. (1995). Fondamenti di sociolinguistica. Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretegnier, A., & Ledegen, G. (Eds.). (2002). Terrains et approches diversifiés, propositions théoriques et méthodologiques en hommage à Nicole Gueunier. Paris: L’Harmattan/A.U.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Aquila, V., & Iannàccaro, G. (2011). Numeri soggettivi. Spunti sulla vitalità linguistica da inchieste e trattamenti quantitativi. In B. Moretti, M. E. Pandolfi, & M. Casoni (Eds.), Vitalità di una lingua minoritaria. Aspetti e proposte metodologiche/Vitality of a minority language. Aspects and methodological issues (pp. 152–192). Bellinzona: Osservatorio Linguistico della Svizzera Italiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15, 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivations in second-language learning. Roxley: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobbo, F. (2014). Review: of Bastardas i Boada (2010). Language Problems & Language Planning, 38(1), 87–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobbo, F. (2015). Transnational communication in a ‘glocalized’ world: In search of balanced multilingualism. JKI Language, Communication, Information, 10, 121–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebl, H., Nelde, P. H., Starý, Z., & Wölck, W. (Eds.). (1996/1997). Kontaktlinguistik/Contact Linguistics/Linguistique de Contact (Vol. 2). Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, E. (1959). Planning for a standard language in modern Norway. Anthropological Linguistics, 1, 8–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houtkamp, C. (2014). Integrating language in theories on long-distance movement: Migration vs mobility and the concept of motility. A’dam Multiling, 2, 16–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannàccaro, G. (2010). Lingue di minoranza e scuola. A dieci anni dalla legge 482/99. Il plurilinguismo scolastico nelle comunità di minoranza della Repubblica Italiana. Quaderni della Direzione Generale per gli Ordinamenti Scolastici e per l’Autonomia Scolastica 1. Roma: Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannàccaro, G., & Dell’Aquila, V. (2006). Survey ladins. Usi linguistici nelle valli ladine. Trento: Regione Autonoma Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iannàccaro, G., & Negro, S. D. (2003). ‘Qui parliamo tutti uguale, ma diverso’. Repertori complessi e interventi sulle lingue. In A. Valentini, P. Molinelli, P. Cuzzolin, & G. Bernini (Eds.), Ecologia linguistica (pp. 431–450). Roma: Bulzoni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kachru, Y., & Smith, L. (2009). The karmic cycle of World Englishes: Some futuristic constructs. World Englishes, 28(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kloss, H. (1952). Die Entwicklung neuer germanischer Kultursprachen seit 1800. München: Pohl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. (1981). Language and Linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, L. (2007). Whose French? Language attitudes, linguistic insecurity and standardization in Quebec. In H. Martin (Ed.), Language issues in Canada: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 64–86). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, R. (2008). Lingua Franca or Lingua Frankensteinia? English in European integration and globalisation. World Englishes, 27, 250–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike, K. L. (1967). Language in relation to a unified theory of the structure of human behavior. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (2000). Linguistic genocide in education, or worldwide diversity and human rights? Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to the present paper has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement No. 613344 (Project MIME). The content and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the institutions supporting them.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Iannàccaro .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Iannàccaro, G., Gobbo, F., Dell’Aquila, V. (2018). The Assessment of Sociolinguistic Justice: Parameters and Models of Analysis. In: Gazzola, M., Templin, T., Wickström, BA. (eds) Language Policy and Linguistic Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75263-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics