Abstract
Research seeks to treat each resource embedded in the nexus as connected to the other resources. This approach is unique from other natural resource research agendas where the primary focus is on system efficiencies or examinations of a single resource. The nexus by emphasizing trade-offs places a premium on coordination. From a governance perspective coordination is not limited to decisions involving finances and allocation of trained human resources among different agencies organized both vertically and horizontally within a multi-level governance framework. Coordination could also be extended to include uses of data between public agencies, private sector and individuals. Due to nexus interconnectivity, we suggest here that social network analysis (SNA) is an appropriate tool that can divulge and highlight the relational complexities that exist within the nexus and among stakeholders that work with the singular elements of the nexus. We suggest that in the cases of organisations with a high institutional capacity by means of expertise, resources, and other assets, the Water-Energy-Food (WEF) network will be highly connected between resource areas in the overall network. Two network tie characteristics—density and centrality—are particularly important to understand a critical mass of interests within a multi-level governance framework. The paper concludes by arguing for the organisation of data covering different dimensions of the Water-Energy-Food nexus through the mechanism of an observatory that could potentially improve our understanding of thresholds of environmental resource use and the incentives required for public agencies to act in support of sustainable development.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ActionAid (2011) East Africa Drought. http://www.actionaid.org/what-we-do/emergencies-conflict/current-emergencies/east-africa-drought
ActionAid (2016) East Africa drought and food crisis—two years on|. http://www.actionaid.org/2013/07/east-africa-drought-and-food-crisis-two-years
Ansell C, Gash A (2008) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theor 18(4):543–71
Berardo R, Olivier T, Lavers A (2015) Focusing events and changes in ecologies of policy games: evidence from the Paraná River Delta. Rev Policy Res 32(4):443–464
Berardo R, Lubell M (2016) Understanding what shapes a polycentric governance system. Public Adm Rev 76(5):738–751
Berardo R, Scholz JT (2010) Self-organizing policy networks: risk, partner selection and cooperation in Estuaries. Am J Polit Sci 54(3):632–49
Bodin Ö, Crona BI (2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Glob Environ Change 19(3):366–374
Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) Ucinet 6 for windows: software for social network analysis
Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Johnson JC (2013) Analyzing social networks. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Chaney NW, Sheffield J, Villarini G, Wood EF (2014) Development of a high-resolution gridded daily meteorological dataset over Sub-Saharan Africa: spatial analysis of trends in climate extremes. J Clim 27(15):5815–35. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00423.1
FAO (2014) Adapting to climate change through land and water management in Eastern Africa. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations and World Bank, Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3781e.pdf
Foran T (2015) Node and regime: interdisciplinary analysis of water-energy-food nexus in the Mekong region. Water Altern 8(1):675–694
Funk C, Pete Peterson, Martin Landsfeld, Diego Pedreros, James Verdin, Shraddhanand Shukla, Gregory Husak, et al. 2015. The climate hazards infrared precipitation with stations—a new environmental record for monitoring extremes. Sci Data 2, Article no. 150066. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2015.66
Jasny L, Lubell M (2015) Two-mode brokerage in Policy networks. Social Net 41:36–47
Krackhardt D (1992) The strength of strong ties: the importance of philos in organizations (pp 216–39). In: Nohria N, Eccles RG (eds) Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action. Boston, MA. Retrieved http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21093527
Kurian Mathew (2017) The water-energy-food Nexus: trade-offs, thresholds and transdisciplinary approaches to sustainable development. Environ Sci Policy 68:97–106
Kurian M, Veiga L, Boer R, Alabaster G (2016a) Wastewater reuse effectiveness index (WREI)—monitoring methodology for SDG target 6.3. UNU-FLORES, Dresden
Kurian M, Ardakanian R, Veiga L, Meyer K (2016b) Resources, services and risks—how can data observatories bridge the science-policy divide in environmental governance. Springer, Switzerland
Leach WD, Pelkey NW, Sabatier PA (2002) Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. J Policy Anal Manage 21(4):645–670
Lubell M (2013) Governing forum complexity: the ecology of games framework. Policy Stud J 41(3):537–59
Lubell M, Scholz J, Berardo R, Robins G (2012) Testing policy theory with statistical models of networks. Policy Stud J 40(3):351–374
Lubell M, Henry AD, McCoy M (2010) Collaborative institutions in an ecology of games. Am J Polit Sci 54(2):287–300
Mannschatz T, Buchroithner M, Hulsmann S (2015) Visualization of water services in Africa: data applications for water governance. In: Kurian M, Ardakanian R (eds) Governing the Nexus—water, soil and waste resources considering global change. Springer, Dordrecht
Mannschatz T, Wolf T, Hülsmann S (2016) Nexus tools platform: web-based comparison of modelling tools for analysis of water-soil-waste Nexus. Environ Model Softw 76:137–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.10.031
Marwell G, Oliver Pamela (1993) The critical mass in collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York
Mason P (2016) Postcapitalism—a guide to our future. Penguin, London
Mastrandrea KJ, Mach, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, pp 1199–1265. http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar5/wg2/WGIIAR5-Chap22_FINAL.pdf
Mewhirter J, Berardo R, Lubell M (2017) Policy influence across multiple forums in complex policy networks. Paper delivered at the 2017 Meetings of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA, January 13
Mochizuki J, Magnuszewski P, Linnerooth-Bayer J (2018) Games for aiding stakeholder deliberation on Nexus policy issues. In: Hülsmann S, Ardakanian R (eds) Managing water, soil and waste resources to achieve sustainable development goals: monitoring and implementation of integrated resources management
Niang I, Ruppel OC, Abdrabo MA, Essel A, Lennard C, Padgham J, Urquhart P (2014) Africa. In: Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: regional aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Barros VR, Field CB, Dokken DJ, MD]
Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons—the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York
Pikaar I, Matassa S, Rabaey K, Laycock B, Boon N, Verstraete W (2018) The urgent need to re-engineer nitrogen-efficient food production for the planet. In: Hülsmann S, Ardakanian R (eds) Managing water, soil and waste resources to achieve sustainable development goals: monitoring and implementation of integrated resources management
Rockstrom J, Steffen W, Noone K, Asa Persson F, Chapin S, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sorlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461(7263):472–475
R Core Team (2012) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/
Scholz JT, Berardo R, Kile B (2008) Do networks solve collective action problems? credibility, search, and collaboration. J Polit 70(2):393–406
Schulzweida U, Kornblueh L, Quast R (2009) CDO—Climate data operators-project management service (Version 1.4.1). Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany. https://code.zmaw.de/projects/cdo
Scott CA, Kurian M, Wescoat JL Jr (2015) The water-energy-food Nexus: enhancing adaptive capacity to complex global challenges. In: Kurian M, Ardakanian R (eds) Governing the Nexus: water, soil and waste resources considering global change. Springer International, Cham, Switzerland
Sheffield J, Goteti G, Wood EF (2006) Development of a 50-year high-resolution global dataset of meteorological forcings for land surface modeling. J Clim 19(13):3088–3111. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3790.1
Wilby RL, Yu D (2013) Rainfall and temperature estimation for a data sparse region. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(10):3937–55. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3937-2013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 United Nations University Institute for Integrated Management of Material Fluxes and of Resources (UNU-FLORES)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kurian, M., Portney, K.E., Rappold, G., Hannibal, B., Gebrechorkos, S.H. (2018). Governance of Water-Energy-Food Nexus: A Social Network Analysis Approach to Understanding Agency Behaviour. In: Hülsmann, S., Ardakanian, R. (eds) Managing Water, Soil and Waste Resources to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75163-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75163-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75162-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75163-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)