Skip to main content

Digital Citizenship in the Global South: “Cool Stuff for Other People”?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Palgrave Handbook of Disability and Citizenship in the Global South

Abstract

Technology, and information and communication technology (ICT) in particular, holds out great hope for disabled people in the Global South. The role of ICTs in solving complex problems of exclusion and scarcity has been touted as central to the transformation of people’s lives. We agree that ICTs hold great promise in this context, but we show in this chapter how structures of exclusion still operate but may be invisibilised through the hype associated with new technologies. Digital citizenships may still be constrained by realities of inequitable access, but rhetorics of inclusion may obscure, and hence exacerbate, inequity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alper, M. (2017). Giving voice: Mobile communication, disability, and inequality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alper, M., & Goggin, G. (2017). Digital technology and rights in the lives of children with disabilities. New Media & Society, 19(5). Online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816686323.

  • Bhatia, R. (2016, May 12). The inside story of Facebook’s biggest setback. Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/may/12/facebook-free-basics-india-zuckerberg

  • Bollas, C. (1987). The shadow of the object: Psychoanalysis of the unthought known. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa, L. (2016, August 16). South America: The rising hub for digital nomads. Retrieved from https://medium.com/south-america-for-digital-nomads/south-america-the-rising-hub-for-digital-nomads-74d6ae3eff79

  • Couldry, N., Stephansen, H., Fotopoulou, A., MacDonald, R., Clark, W., & Dickens, L. (2014). Digital citizenship? Narrative exchange and the changing terms of civic culture. Citizenship, 18(6–7), 615–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry, N., Rodriguez, R., Bolin, G., Cohen, J., Goggin, G., Kraidy, M., et al. (in press). Media and communications. In Report of the international panel on social progress. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalvit, L. (in press). Mobile phones and visual impairment in South Africa: Experiences from a small town. In K. Ellis, G. Goggin, & B. Haller (Eds.), Routledge companion to disability and media. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disabled People’s International (DPI). (2016, April 11–13). Delhi Declaration. 9th DPI World Assembly, Delhi. Retrieved from http://www.dpiworldassembly2016.com/

  • Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2016). Unrealized potential: Exploring the digital disability divide. Poetics, 58, 18–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donner, J. (2015). After access: Inclusion, development, and a more mobile Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellcessor, E. (2016). Restricted access: Media, disability and the politics of participation. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, K., & Kent, M. (2011). Disability and new media. London/New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • French, S. (1993). What’s so great about independence? In J. Swain, V. Finkelstein, S. French, & M. Oliver (Eds.), Disabling barriers—Enabling environments (pp. 44–48). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, S. (1991). Identity crisis: Modernity, psychoanalysis and the self. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, G. (2016). Reimagining digital citizenship via disability. In A. McCosker, S. Vivienne, & A. Johns (Eds.), Negotiating digital citizenship: Control, contest, culture (pp. 61–80). London: Rowman & Littefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, G. (2017). Disability and digital inequalities: Rethinking digital divides with disability theory. In M. Ragnedda & G. Muschert (Eds.), Theorizing digital divides. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, G., & McLelland, M. (Eds.). (2017). Routledge companion to global internet histories. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2003). Digital disability: The social construction of disability in new media. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2007). The business of digital disability. The Information Society, 24(2), 159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goode, L. (2010). Cultural citizenship online: The internet and digital culture. Citizenship Studies, 14(5), 527–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodley, D. (2011). Social psychoanalytic disability studies. Disability & Society, 26(6), 715–728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S. (2011). Recolonising debates or perpetuated coloniality? Decentring the spaces of disability, development, and community in the Global South. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(1), 87–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grech, S., & Soldatic, K. (Eds.). (2016). Disability in the Global South: The critical handbook. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpur, P. (2017). Discrimination, copyright and equality: Law opening the eBook for the print disabled. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, J. (2007). Telecommunications and empire. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, C. (1984). The minimal self: Psychical survival in troubled times. London: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazar, J., Goldstein, D., & Taylor, A. (2015). Ensuring digital accessibility through process and policy. Waltham: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Third, A. (2017). Children and young people’s rights in the digital age: An emerging agenda. New Media & Society, 15(5), 657–670. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/68759/

  • Marks, D. (1999). Disability: Controversial debates and psychosocial perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martìnez, G. (2008). Latin American telecommunications: Télefonica’s conquest. Lanham: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCosker, A., Vivienne, S., & Johns, A. (Eds.). (2016). Negotiating digital citizenship: Control, contest, culture. London: Rowman & Littefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & McNeal, R. S. (2007). Digital citizenship: The internet, society, and participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Haver, K. (in press). Youth with disabilities in Africa: Bridging the disability divide. In K. Ellis, G. Goggin, & B. Haller (Eds.), Routledge companion to disability and media. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal, J. (2015). Access technologies and accessibility for inclusion. In R. Mansell & P. Ang (Eds.), International encyclopedia of digital communication and society (Vol. 1). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pal, J., Chandra, P., O’Neill, T., Youngman, M., Jones, J., Song, J. H., et al. (2016, June 3–6). An accessibility infrastructure for the Global South. In ICTD ’16: Proceedings of the eighth international conference on information and communication technologies and development (article 24). Ann Arbor/New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quadir, I. (2005, July). How mobile phones can fight poverty. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/iqbal_quadir_says_mobiles_fight_poverty

  • Raja, D. S. (2016). Bridging the disability divide through digital technologies. World Development Report 2016 Background paper Digital Dividends. Retrieved from http://pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/123481461249337484/WDR16-BP-Bridging-the-Disability-Divide-through-Digital-Technology-RAJA.pdf

  • Ribble, M. (2015). Digital citizenship in schools: Nine elements all students should know (3rd ed.). Arlington: International Society for Technology in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roulstone, A. (2016). Disability and technology: International and interdisciplinary perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A., & Lewthwaite, S. (2016). Critical silences: Disability, networked technologies and the Global South. In S. Grech & K. Soldatic (Eds.), Disability in the Global South: The critical handbook (pp. 483–500). Cham: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Samant, D., Matter, R., & Harniss, M. (2012). Realizing the potential of accessible ICTs in developing countries. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 8(1), 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • The tech continent: Africa’s digital renaissance. (2016, July 30). Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/series/the-tech-continent-africas-digital-renaissance

  • Thussu, D. (Ed.). (2011). Internationalizing media studies. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchkovsky, T. (2011). The question of access: Disability, space, meaning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treacher, A. (1989). Be your own person: Dependence/independence, 1950–1985. In B. Richards (Ed.), Crises of the self: Further essays on psychoanalysis and politics (pp. 131–146). London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2016, June 22). UNESCO promotes universal access to digital information for persons with disabilities at the COSP9 [Conference of states to the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities] in New York. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/media-services/single-view/news/unesco_promotes_universal_access_to_digital_information_for/

  • Watermeyer, B. (2006). Disability and psychoanalysis. In B. Watermeyer, L. Swartz, M. Schneider, T. Lorenzo, & M. Priestley (Eds.), Disability and social change: A South African agenda (pp. 31–43). Pretoria: HSRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watermeyer, B. (2012). Is it possible to create a politically engaged, contextual psychology of disability? Disability & Society, 27(2), 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watermeyer, B. (2013). Towards a contextual psychology of disablism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watermeyer, B. (2014). Freedom to read: A personal account of the ‘book famine’. African Journal of Disability, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/ajod.v3i1.144.

  • Watermeyer, B., & Swartz, L. (2008). Conceptualising the psycho-emotional aspects of disability and impairment: The distortion of personal and psychic boundaries. Disability and Society, 23(6), 599–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watermeyer, B., & Swartz, L. (2016). Disablism, identity and self: Discrimination as a traumatic assault on subjectivity. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2266.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Gerard Goggin gratefully acknowledges the support of an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship project on Disability and Digital Technology (grant number FT130100097) for his research on this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Watermeyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Watermeyer, B., Goggin, G. (2019). Digital Citizenship in the Global South: “Cool Stuff for Other People”?. In: Watermeyer, B., McKenzie, J., Swartz, L. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Disability and Citizenship in the Global South. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74675-3_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics