Skip to main content

Governance Failure and Social Trust: Dispute over Building a Flood Prevention System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This case is about governance practices destroying social trust and about the lack of social trust destroying governance. It illustrates how public officials were unable to question the methods and goals of the planning process and eventually withdrew from problem-solving action, leaving the problem of anti-flood security unsolved.

What happened there was the worst possible scenario. In the face of resistance, they just dropped the issue of barriers. The area is at risk… we have not drawn any lessons from those events.

A national agency representative, interview, October 2013

Most of the data used for an analysis of this case were gathered by Robert Rządca (including fieldwork and collecting of archival documents).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The highest level of local government in Poland. The levels from lowest to highest are: municipality-province-region.

  2. 2.

    The Central Village, where barriers were planned is located in the central municipality. The Mayor of the latter supported the project. Little Village is located in southern municipality. The Mayor of the latter opposed the project.

References

  • Ansell, Christopher. 2011. Pragmatist Democracy. Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Laws, David, and John Forester. 2015. Conflict, Improvisation, Governance Street Level Practices for Urban Democracy. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schreyögg, Georg, Jörg Sydow, and Philip Holtmann. 2011. How History Matters in Organisations: The Case of Path Dependence. Management & Organizational History 6 (81): 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanow, Dvora, and H. Tsoukas. 2011. What Is Reflection-in-Action? A Phenomenological Account. Journal of Management Studies 46 (8): 1339–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Strumińska-Kutra, M. (2018). Governance Failure and Social Trust: Dispute over Building a Flood Prevention System. In: Democratizing Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74591-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74591-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74590-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74591-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics