Skip to main content

Towards a Taxonomy of Human Resource Allocation Criteria

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2017)

Abstract

Allocating the most appropriate resource to execute the activities of a business process is a key aspect within the organizational perspective. An optimal selection of the resources that are in charge of executing the activities may contribute to improve the efficiency and the performance of the business processes. Despite the existence of resource metamodels that seek to provide a better representation of resources, a detailed classification of the allocation criteria that have been used to evaluate resources is missing. In this paper, we provide an initial proposal for a resource allocation criteria taxonomy. This taxonomy is based on an extensive literature review that yielded 2,370 articles regarding the existing resource allocation approaches within the business process management discipline, from which 95 articles were considered for the analysis. The proposed taxonomy points out the most frequently used criteria for assessing the resources from January 2005 to July 2016.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process-aware information systems: lessons to be learned from process mining. ToPNoC 2, 1–26 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining - Data Science in Action. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Kumar, A., Verbeek, H.M.W.E.: Organizational modeling in UML and XML in the context of workflow systems. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC), Melbourne, FL, USA, 9–12 March 2003, pp. 603–608 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arias, M., Munoz-Gama, J., Sepúlveda, M.: Introducing a taxonomy of human resource allocation criteria. Technical report, Pontificia Universidad Católica, Santiago, Chile, June 2017. http://processmininguc.com/publications/

  5. Arias, M., Rojas, E., Lee, J., Munoz-Gama, J., Sepúlveda, M.: ResRec: a multi-criteria tool for resource recommendation. In: BPM Demos 2016, pp. 17–22 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cabanillas, C.: Enhancing the management of resource-aware business processes. AI Commun. 29(1), 237–238 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cabanillas, C.: Process-and resource-aware information systems. In: EDOC 2016, Vienna, Austria, 5–9 September 2016, pp. 1–10 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cabanillas, C., Resinas, M., Ruiz-Cortés, A.: RAL: a high-level user-oriented resource assignment language for business processes. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNBIP, vol. 99, pp. 50–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28108-2_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Cabanillas, C., Resinas, M., del-Río-Ortega, A., Cortés, A.R.: Specification and automated design-time analysis of the business process human resource perspective. Inf. Syst. 52, 55–82 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dumas, M., Rosa, M.L., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Fundamentals of Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33143-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Havur, G., Cabanillas, C., Mendling, J., Polleres, A.: Resource allocation with dependencies in business process management systems. In: La Rosa, M., Loos, P., Pastor, O. (eds.) BPM 2016. LNBIP, vol. 260, pp. 3–19. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45468-9_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, A., Obregon, J., Jung, J.-Y.: Constructing decision trees from process logs for performer recommendation. In: Lohmann, N., Song, M., Wohed, P. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNBIP, vol. 171, pp. 224–236. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06257-0_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Kitchenham, B.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele Univ. 33(2004), 1–26 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koschmider, A., Yingbo, L., Schuster, T.: Role assignment in business process models. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNBIP, vol. 99, pp. 37–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28108-2_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. zur Muehlen, M.: Organizational management in workflow applications - issues and perspectives. Inf. Technol. Manag. 5(3–4), 271–291 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oberweis, A.: A meta-model based approach to the description of resources and skills. In: Sustainable IT Collaboration Around the Globe, AMCIS 2010, Lima, Peru, 12–15 August 2010, p. 383 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Russell, N., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Edmond, D.: Workflow resource patterns: identification, representation and tool support. In: Pastor, O., Falcão e Cunha, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3520, pp. 216–232. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11431855_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Schönig, S., Cabanillas, C., Jablonski, S., Mendling, J.: A framework for efficiently mining the organisational perspective of business processes. DSS 89, 87–97 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stroppi, L.J.R., Chiotti, O., Villarreal, P.D.: A BPMN 2.0 extension to define the resource perspective of business process models. In: XIV CIbSE, pp. 25–38 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stroppi, L.J.R., Chiotti, O., Villarreal, P.D.: Defining the resource perspective in the development of processes-aware information systems. Inf. Softw. Technol. 59, 86–108 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yaghoubi, M., Zahedi, M.: Resource allocation using task similarity distance in business process management systems. In: ICSPIS 2016, IEEE . pp. 1–5 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhao, W., Yang, L., Liu, H., Wu, R.: The optimization of resource allocation based on process mining. In: Huang, D.-S., Han, K. (eds.) ICIC 2015. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9227, pp. 341–353. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22053-6_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhao, W., Zhao, X.: Process mining from the organizational perspective. In: Wen, Z., Li, T. (eds.) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. AISC, vol. 277, pp. 701–708. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54924-3_66

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was partially funded by the Ph.D. Scholarship Program of CONICYT Chile (Doctorado Nacional/2014-63140181) and by Universidad de Costa Rica.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Arias .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Arias, M., Munoz-Gama, J., Sepúlveda, M. (2018). Towards a Taxonomy of Human Resource Allocation Criteria. In: Teniente, E., Weidlich, M. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 308. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74030-0_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74030-0_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-74029-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-74030-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics