Skip to main content

The Pantograph: A Historical Drawing Device for Math Teaching

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 978 Accesses

Part of the book series: ICME-13 Monographs ((ICME13Mo))

Abstract

Invented more than 400 years ago, the Pantograph—also called “Stork’s beak”—is still known in modern times. Although it has lost its practical importance, it still invites users to play with geometry. This and the fact that the mathematical background to its working has strong links to modern curriculum suggest studying the Pantograph in class may be beneficial. Furthermore, the history of the Pantograph is described in historical sources and tells a lot about the history of mathematics. But can the history of the Pantograph be used in class to teach mathematics, Latin, history, or handicraft? We investigate this question in an interdisciplinary school project using the classical text by Christoph Scheiner of 1631 for studying the Pantograph with students of grades 8–11.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arcavi, A., & Bruckheimer, M. (2000). Didactical uses of primary sources from the history of mathematics. Themes in Education, 1(1), 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbin, É. (1991). The reading of original texts: How and why to introduce a historical perspective. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(2), 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramer, B. (1617). Bericht eines Parallel Instruments. In B. Bramer (Ed.), Bericht und Gebrauch eines Proportional Lineals: Neben kurzem Underricht eines Parallel-Instruments (pp. 47–58). Marburg: Paul Egenolff. http://www.mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn/resolver.pl?urn=urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb10052767-8. Accessed August 11, 2017.

  • Daxecker, F. (2014). Christoph Scheiner und die physiologische Optik des Auges. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, 231(10), 1034–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasanelli, F., Arcavi, A., Bekken, O., Carvalho e Silva, J., Daniel, C., Furinghetti, F., et al. (2000). The political context. In J. Fauvel & J. van Maanen (Eds.), History in mathematics education: The ICMI study. New ICMI Study Series (Vol. 6, pp. 1–38). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaubitz, M. R. (2010). Mathematikgeschichte lesen und verstehen: Eine theoretische und empirische Vergleichstudie (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Essen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goebel, M., Malitte, E., Richter, K., Schlosser, H., Schöneburg, S., & Sommer, R. (2003). Der Pantograph in historischen Veröffentlichungen des 17. bis 19. Jahrhunderts. In Schriften zum Bibliotheks- und Büchereiwesen in Sachsen-Anhalt, 84. Halle (Saale): Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griesel, H., Postel, H., Suhr, F., Ladenthin, W., & Lösche, M. (Eds.). (2015). EdM—Elemente der Mathematik Sachsen 8. Schuljahr. Braunschweig: Schroedel/Westermann Gruppe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahnke, H. N., Arcavi, A., Barbin, É., Bekken, O., Furinghetti, F., El Idrissi, A., et al. (2000). The use of original sources in the mathematics classroom. In J. Fauvel & J. van Maanen (Eds.), History in mathematics education: The ICMI study. New ICMI Study Series (Vol. 6, pp. 291–328). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahnke, H. N., Furinghetti, F., & van Maanen, J. (Eds.). (2006). Report No. 22/2006 on the mini-workshop on studying original sources in mathematics education (pp. 1285–1318). Oberwolfach: Mathematisches Forschunginstitut Oberwolfach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankvist, U. T. (2009). A categorization of the “whys” and “hows” of using history in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 235–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jankvist, U. T. (2014). On the use of primary sources in the teaching and learning of mathematics. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science Teaching (pp. 873–908). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandel, H.-J. (2003). Quelleninterpretation. Die schriftliche Quelle im Geschichtsunterricht. Schwalbach/Ts: Wochenschau Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pengelley, D. (2011). Teaching with primary historical sources: Should it go mainstream? Can it? In V. Katz & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), Recent developments on introducing a historical dimension in mathematics education. MAA Notes (Vol. 78, pp. 1–8). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richter, K., & Schöneburg, S. (2008). Der Jesuitengelehrte Christoph Scheiner und sein Lehrbuch zum Zeichengerät Pantograph. In G. Biegel, K. Reich, & T. Sonar (Eds.), Historische Aspekte im Mathematikunterricht an Schule und Universität (pp. 137–198). Göttingen: Termessos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner, C. (1631). Pantographice, seu ars delineandi, res quaslibet per parallelo-grammum lineare seu cavum, mechani-cum, mobile. Rome: Ex Typography Ludouici Grignani.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönewald, B. (Ed.). (2000). Sammelblatt des historischen Vereins Ingolstadt, Jahrgang 109. http://periodika.digitale-sammlungen.de/ingolstadt/Band_bsb00045411.html. Accessed August 10, 2017.

  • Schwenter, D. (1625). Geometriæ practicæ novæ tractatus I. Nuremburg: Simon Halbmayer. http://diglib.hab.de/drucke/xb-4758-1/start.htm. Accessed August 30, 2017.

  • Scriba, C. J. (1983). Die Rolle der Geschichte der Mathematik in der Ausbildung von Schülern und Lehrern. DMV—Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung, 85(3), 113–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomaidis, Y., & Tzanakis, C. (2008). Original texts in theclassroom. In É. Barbin, N. Stehlíková, & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), History and epistemology in mathematics education: Proceedings of the 5th ESU (pp. 49–61). Prague: Vydavatelskýservis, Plzeň.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Randenborgh, C. (2015). Instrumente der Wissenvermittlung im Mathematikunterricht. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Braunmühl, A. (1891). Christoph Scheiner als Mathematiker, Physiker und Astronom. Bamberg: Buchner.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Schöneburg-Lehnert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schöneburg-Lehnert, S. (2018). The Pantograph: A Historical Drawing Device for Math Teaching. In: Clark, K., Kjeldsen, T., Schorcht, S., Tzanakis, C. (eds) Mathematics, Education and History . ICME-13 Monographs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73924-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73924-3_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73923-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73924-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics