Skip to main content

“Logic is the beginning of wisdom … not the end”: Using Star Trek to Teach Scientific Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 583 Accesses

Abstract

To paraphrase Batman: “[humans] are a superstitious and cowardly lot”. We cling to our preconceptions against all evidence, literally unable to see the unexpected forest when we find that our field of view is crowded with an unanticipated number of trees. Our preconceptions and other cognitive biases weaken our individual ability to perceive the world around us. Telling fact from fantasy requires cooperation and formal, unintuitive thought. Scientific thinking may be the single greatest intellectual tool ever developed. Contrary to popular belief, it is not a way of proving things true, but a way of proving them false. It is not the work of a singular intellect, but a social activity. It is a method of altering the inherent iterative cycles of bias reinforcement and leaps of faith that we consider intuitive thinking, so that we explicitly define the weaknesses in our own ideas and count on others to help us find the flaws we’ve missed. But how does one teach this unintuitive style of thinking? How do we keep our students from exchanging one set of preconceptions and cognitive shortcuts for another? Personally, I use mental models with which they are already familiar. Personally, I use Star Trek.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This observation stands for the entire corpus of Star Trek (television, films, animation, and novels, until the franchise was rebooted as a film series in 2009. Prior to that, each adventure would present a complex social issue through simplified allegorical scenarios, and resolution would be achieved through the emotional and intellectual struggles of a team of well-trained experts at the peak of their careers. The first two films of the reboot reversed this pattern, telling unnecessarily complex stories built around a series of simple problems, resolved through the physical actions of sophomoric individuals who succeed through a mixture of individual exceptionalism and luck.

Works Cited

  1. Kozinets R (2001) Utopian Enterprise: articulating the meanings of Star Trek’s culture of consumption. J Consum Res 28(1):67–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Feynman RP (1969) What is science. Phys Teach 7(6):313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Feynman RP (1955) The Value of Science. Eng Sci 19(3):13–15

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heinlein RA, Robinson S (2006) Variable star. Tom Doherty Associates, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown JNA (2015) Anthropology-based computing. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gladwell M (2005) Blink: the power of thinking without thinking. Little, Brown and Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1984) Choices, values, and frames. Am Psychol 39(4):341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Aristotle (1902) Aristotle’s psychology (trans. of the De Anima and Parva Naturalia, w. Introd. and Notes). Swan Sonnenschien and Company, Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Freud S (1961) The ego and the id. In: Strachey J (ed & trans). The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud. Hogarth Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jung CG (1969) The structure of the psyche. In: Read H, Fordham M, Adler G, McGuire W (eds) The collected works of C. G. Jung: Vol. 8. The structure and dynamics of the psyche, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  11. Broca P (1865) Sur le siège de la faculté du langage articulé. Bulletins de la Société d’Anthropologie de Paris 6(1):377–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. MacLean PD (1990) The triune brain in evolution: role in paleocerebral functions. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brown JNA (2016) Psychology and neurology: the surprisingly simple science of using your brain. In: Anthropology-based computing. Springer, Cham, pp 103–118

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Sagan C (2012) Dragons of Eden: speculations on the evolution of human intelligence. Ballantine Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Einstein A (1950) Memorial to Mme Curie. In: Out of my later years: the scientist, philosopher, and man portrayed through his own words. Philosophical Library, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brown JNA (2013) It’s as easy as ABC. In: International work-conference on artificial neural networks. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jowett, B. (1871)..Plato: the republic. Retrieved from: http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/1497

  18. Descartes R (1637) Discours de la méthode pour bien conduire sa raison, et chercher la vérité dans les sciences. Chez A.-A. Renouard, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gardner DS (1932) Perception and memory of witnesses. Cornell Law Q 18:391

    Google Scholar 

  20. Heider KG (1988) The Rashomon effect: when ethnographers disagree. Am Anthropol 90(1):73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kendall J (2008) The man who made lists: love, death, madness, and the creation of Roget’s Thesaurus. Putnam, New York

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roget PM (1825) Explanation of an optical deception in the appearance of the spokes of a wheel seen through vertical apertures. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 115:131–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bendazzi G (1994) Cartoons: one hundred years of cinema animation. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  24. Henri Victor B, Erdmann RD (1898) Recherches psychologiques sur la lecture, fondées sur des expériences. L’année psychologique. 5:673–694. Retrieved from: http://www.persee.fr/doc/psy_0003-5033_1898_num_5_1_3097

  25. Zuber BL, Stark L (1966) Saccadic suppression: elevation of visual threshold associated with saccadic eye movements. Exp Neurol 16(1):65–79.24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bill Finger B, Kane B (1939) The Case of the Chemical Syndicate, DETECTIVE COMICS #27, at 2 (DC Comics, May 1939)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Descartes R (1644) Principia Philosophiae. Sumtibus Friderici Knochii & Filii

    Google Scholar 

  28. Augustine of Hippo (circa 400) The city of god against the pagans, Book XI, Chapter 26

    Google Scholar 

  29. Feynman RP, Robbins J (1999) The pleasure of finding things out: the best short works of Richard P. Feynman.Perseus Books, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brown, J.N.A. (2018). “Logic is the beginning of wisdom … not the end”: Using Star Trek to Teach Scientific Thinking. In: Rabitsch, S., Gabriel, M., Elmenreich, W., Brown, J. (eds) Set Phasers to Teach!. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73776-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73776-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73775-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73776-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics