Skip to main content

How Expected Survival Influences the Choice of Surgical Procedure in Metastatic Bone Disease

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Management of Bone Metastases

Abstract

Accurate estimation of expected survival is very helpful in the choice of patients that are good candidates for surgery, as well as in the choice of the surgical method and implant used. If we treat the short-time survivors and the long-time survivors with the same reconstruction, we will inevitably overtreat the short-time survivors and undertreat the long-time survivors. This translates to too extensive surgery and rehabilitation need in the short-time survivors. In this chapter we discuss our present general treatment recommendations based on prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hansen BH, Keller J, Laitinen M, Berg P, Skjeldal S, Trovik C, et al. The Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Skeletal Metastasis Register. Survival after surgery for bone metastases in the pelvis and extremities. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 2004;75:11–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kirkinis MN, Lyne CJ, Wilson MD, Choong PFM. Metastatic bone disease: a review of survival, prognostic factors and outcomes following surgical treatment of the appendicular skeleton. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.036.

  3. Ratasvuori M, Wedin R, Keller J, Nottrott M, Zaikova O, Bergh P, et al. Insight opinion to surgically treated metastatic bone disease: Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Skeletal Metastasis Registry report of 1195 operated skeletal metastasis. Surg Oncol. 2013;22:132–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2013.02.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wedin R. Surgical treatment for pathologic fracture. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl. 2001;72:2p., 1–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mirels H. Metastatic disease in long bones: a proposed scoring system for diagnosing impending pathologic fractures. Clin Orthop. 1989;2003:S4–13. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000093045.56370.dd.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ratasvuori M, Wedin R, Hansen BH, Keller J, Trovik C, Zaikova O, et al. Prognostic role of en-bloc resection and late onset of bone metastasis in patients with bone-seeking carcinomas of the kidney, breast, lung, and prostate: SSG study on 672 operated skeletal metastases. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110:360–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fukushima H, Hozumi T, Goto T, Nihei K, Karasawa K, Nakanishi Y, et al. Prognostic significance of intensive local therapy to bone lesions in renal cell carcinoma patients with bone metastasis. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2016;33:699–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-016-9805-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wedin R, Bauer HC, Wersäll P. Failures after operation for skeletal metastatic lesions of long bones. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;358:128–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wise JJ, Fischgrund JS, Herkowitz HN, Montgomery D, Kurz LT. Complication, survival rates, and risk factors of surgery for metastatic disease of the spine. Spine. 1999;24:1943–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bollen L, de Ruiter GCW, Pondaag W, Arts MP, Fiocco M, Hazen TJT, et al. Risk factors for survival of 106 surgically treated patients with symptomatic spinal epidural metastases. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:1408–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2726-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lau D, Leach MR, Than KD, Ziewacz J, La Marca F, Park P. Independent predictors of complication following surgery for spinal metastasis. Eur Spine J. 2013;22:1402–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-2706-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Viganò A, Dorgan M, Bruera E, Suarez-Almazor ME. The relative accuracy of the clinical estimation of the duration of life for patients with end of life cancer. Cancer. 1999;86:170–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chow E, Harth T, Hruby G, Finkelstein J, Wu J, Danjoux C. How accurate are physicians’ clinical predictions of survival and the available prognostic tools in estimating survival times in terminally ill cancer patients? A systematic review. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2001;13:209–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bauer HC, Wedin R. Survival after surgery for spinal and extremity metastases. Prognostication in 241 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1995;66:143–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Forsberg JA, Eberhardt J, Boland PJ, Wedin R, Healey JH. Estimating survival in patients with operable skeletal metastases: an application of a Bayesian belief network. PLoS One. 2011;6:e19956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019956.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Forsberg JA, Wedin R, Bauer HCF, Hansen BH, Laitinen M, Trovik CS, et al. External validation of the Bayesian Estimated Tools for Survival (BETS) models in patients with surgically treated skeletal metastases. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:493. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-493.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Piccioli A, Spinelli MS, Forsberg JA, Wedin R, Healey JH, Ippolito V, et al. How do we estimate survival? External validation of a tool for survival estimation in patients with metastatic bone disease-decision analysis and comparison of three international patient populations. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:424. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1396-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ogura K, Gokita T, Shinoda Y, Kawano H, Takagi T, Ae K, Kawai A, Wedin R, Forsberg JA. Can a multivariate model for survival estimation in skeletal metastases (PATHFx) be externally validated using Japanese patients? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017;475(9):2263–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5389-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wedin R, Hansen BH, Laitinen M, Trovik C, Zaikova O, Bergh P, et al. Complications and survival after surgical treatment of 214 metastatic lesions of the humerus. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2012;21:1049–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2011.06.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nelson DA, Barker ME, Hamlin BH. Thermal effects of acrylic cementation at bone tumour sites. Int J Hyperthermia. 1997;13:287–306.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stark A, Bauer HC. Reconstruction in metastatic destruction of the acetabulum. Support rings and arthroplasty in 12 patients. Acta Orthop Scand. 1996;67:435–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weiss RJ, Wedin R. Surgery for skeletal metastases in lung cancer. Acta Orthop. 2011;82:96–101. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.552779.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Tsagozis P, Wedin R, Brosjö O, Bauer H. Reconstruction of metastatic acetabular defects using a modified Harrington procedure. Acta Orthop. 2015;86:690–4. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1077308.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Weiss RJ, Ekström W, Hansen BH, Keller J, Laitinen M, Trovik C, et al. Pathological subtrochanteric fractures in 194 patients: a comparison of outcome after surgical treatment of pathological and non-pathological fractures. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107:498–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bauer HC. Posterior decompression and stabilization for spinal metastases. Analysis of sixty-seven consecutive patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:514–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tibbs MK. Wound healing following radiation therapy: a review. Radiother Oncol J Eur Soc Ther Radiol Oncol. 1997;42:99–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tong D, Gillick L, Hendrickson FR. The palliation of symptomatic osseous metastases: final results of the study by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Cancer. 1982;50:893–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rikard Wedin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tsagozis, P., Forsberg, J., Bauer, H.C.F., Wedin, R. (2019). How Expected Survival Influences the Choice of Surgical Procedure in Metastatic Bone Disease. In: Denaro, V., Di Martino, A., Piccioli, A. (eds) Management of Bone Metastases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73485-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73485-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73484-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73485-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics