Abstract
This chapter draws on a range of historical, philosophical and contemporary design references to argue for a broad view of graphic design thinking as a distinct approach to problem-solving. The history of epistemology is linked to the history of modes of communication, and this in turn is intimately tied to the development of textual organization, typographic and diagrammatic representation. Modes of thought and the way we acquire and share knowledge are shown to exist in symbiosis with technological development. In order to help define this mode of thinking, we consider the distinctions and similarities between forms of academic research in the humanities, the sciences, and in design. We also present seven characteristics pertaining to graphic design thinking in particular, making reference to the history and theory of graphic communication as well as to standards of professional practice. The final outcome of this mode of thinking implies action; it is inherently synthetic, generative and future-conscious. Defining and making explicit these seven characteristics puts into sharp relief the potential for graphic design thinking to be a tool of practical and ethical engagement with the world.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bajetta, C. M. (2000). Some notes on printing & publishing in renaissance venice. New York: Typophiles.
Baxandall, M. (1985). Patterns of intention: On the historical explanation of pictures. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Beltrán, E. (2012). The world explained: A microhistorical encyclopaedia. Amsterdam: Roma Publications.
Bonnet-Bidaud, J.-M., Praderie, F., & Whitfield, S. (2009). The Dunhaung Chinese sky: A comprehensive study of the oldest known star atlas. http://idp.bl.uk/education/astronomy_researchers/index.a4d. Accessed 14 Aug 2015.
Bonsiepe, G. (1968). A method of quantifying order in typographic design. Ulm, 21, 24–31.
Bonsiepe, G. (1999). Interface: An approach to design. Maastricht: Jan van Eyck Akademie.
Cross, N. (2006). Designerly ways of knowing. London: Springer.
Drucker, J. (2004). Speculative computing: Aesthetic provocations in humanities computing. In S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, & J. Unsworth (Eds.), A companion to digital humanities. Oxford: Blackwell.
Eisenstein, E. (1979). The printing press as an agent of change: Communications and cultural transformations in early modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foucault, M. (1996). Interview with Michel Foucault. In S. Lotringer (Ed.), Foucault live: (interviews) (pp. 1961–1984). New York: Semiotext(e).
Gillieson, K. (2008) A framework for graphic description in book design. PhD thesis. Department of Typography & Graphic Communication, University of Reading, UK.
Gombrich, E. (1962). Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation. New York: Pantheon Books.
Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gretzinger, K. (2012). In a manner of reading design. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
Habermas, J. (1989). Technology and science as “ideology”. In S. Seidman (Ed.), Jürgen Habermas on society and politics: A reader. Boston: Beacon Press.
Intelligence [Def. 1, 2]. (n.a.) (n.d.). Merriam-Webster Online. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intelligence. Accessed 25 Nov 2015.
Intelligence [Def. 1]. (n.a.) (n.d.). Oxford Dictionaries. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/intelligence. Accessed 25 Nov 2015
Kolko, J. (2010). Abductive thinking and sensemaking: The drivers of design synthesis. Design Issues, 26(1), 15–28.
Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
Kristeva, J. (1986). In T. Moi (Ed.), The Kristeva reader. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Lindinger, H. (1990). Ulm design: The morality of objects. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McCloud, S. (1993). Understanding comics: The invisible art. New York: Harper Collins.
Miller, D. (Ed.). (1985). Popper selections. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Olson, D. (1994). The world on paper: The conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London: Methuen.
Ong, W. (1983). Ramus, method, and the decay of dialogue: From the art of discourse to the art of reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Peirce, C. (1991). On the nature of signs. In J. Hoopes (Ed.), Peirce on signs: Writings on semiotic (pp. 141–143). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Richards, C. (1984). Diagrammatics. London: School of Graphic Arts, Department of Graphic Design, Royal College of Art.
Richards, C. (1998). Getting the picture: Diagram design and the information revolution. Information Design Journal, 9, 87–110.
Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1972). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Smith, F. (2004). Understanding reading: A psycholinguistic analysis of reading and learning to read. London: Routledge.
Taylor, C. (1991). The malaise of modernity. Concord: House of Anansi Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gillieson, K., Garneau, S. (2018). A Case for Graphic Design Thinking. In: Vermaas, P., Vial, S. (eds) Advancements in the Philosophy of Design. Design Research Foundations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73301-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73302-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)