Abstract
In 1972 a two-day symposium entitled “Institutions for a Post-Technological Society—The Universitas Project” was held at MoMA and organised by its then curator of design, Emilio Ambasz. Its vision was nothing less than to establish “a new type of University concerned with the evaluation and design of our man-made milieu.” Three years in the making Ambasz managed to draw in an incredible list of attendees and participants. A number of these were picked out to respond to a provocation written by Ambasz and forwarded to them as a booklet—it was to become known as the “black book.” This chapter will closely examine both the provocation and the responses to it to identify the debate over a nascent philosophy of the artificial and what this may mean for an idea of a new form or approach to knowledge, and therefore of the university. Perhaps it is only now that what was seeded by Ambasz has come to fruition—the possibility of a university of design.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ambasz, E. (1969). The formulation of a design discourse. Perspecta, 12, 57–70.
Ambasz, E. (1971). I: The university of design and development. II: Manhattan: Capital of the twentieth century. III: The designs of freedom. Perspecta, 13(14), 359–365.
Ambasz, E. (Ed.). (1972). Italy: The new domestic landscape. Achievements and problems of Italian design. New York and Florence: The Museum of Modern Art and Centro Di. Catalogue.
Ambasz, E. (1993). Interview with Sharon Zane. The Museum of Modern Art oral history program. https://www.moma.org/momaorg/shared/pdfs/docs/learn/archives/transcript_ambasz.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2016.
Ambasz, E. (Conceived and directed). (2006). The universitas project, solutions for a post-technological society. New York: The Museum of Modern Art.
Anker, P. (2010). From Bauhaus to ecohouse: A history of ecological design. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
Arendt, H. (1978). The life of the mind. San Diego: Harvest.
Arendt, H. (1998 [1958]). The human condition. 2nd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Bach, C. (1999). Making space. Américas, 51(1), 6–15.
Bachelard, G. (1969). The poetics of space. Trans. Maria Jolas. Boston: Beacon Press.
Barthes, R. (1985). The fashion system. Trans. Matthew Ward and Richard Howard. London: Cape.
Baudrillard, J. (1972). Pour une critique de l’économie politique. Paris: Gallimard. English edition: Baudrillard, J. (1981). For a critique of the political economy of the sign. Trans. Charles Levin. Telos Press.
Baudrillard, J. (1996). The system of objects (J. Benedict, Trans.). London: Verso.
Baudrillard, J. (1998). The consumer society. Trans. Chris Turner. London: Sage.
Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational aesthetics. Paris: Les presses du réel.
Busbea, L. (2009). Metadesign: Object and environment in France, c. 1970. Design Issues, 24(4), 103–119.
Carter, P. (2015). Turbulence. Climate change and the design of complexity. Sydney: Puncher & Wattmann.
Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Debord, G. (1995). The society of the spectacle. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. New York: Zone Books.
Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59(Winter), 3–7.
Dorst, K. (2015). Frame innovation. Create new thinking by design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ellul, J. (1954). La technique ou l’enjeu du siècle. Paris: Librairie Armand Colin. English edition: Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society. Trans. John Wilkinson. New York: Vintage.
Flusser, V. (1999). The shape of things. A philosophy of design. London: Reaktion Books.
Foucault, M. (1963). Naissance de la clinique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France. English edition: Foucault, M. (1986). The birth of the clinic. An archaeology of medical perception. Trans. A. M. Sheridan. London/New York: Routledge.
Frank, S. (2011). IAUS: The institute for architecture and urban studies. An insider’s memoir. Bloomington: AuthorHouse.
Fry, T. (2012). Becoming human by design. London/New York: Berg.
Harvey, D. (2006). Spaces of global capitalism: Towards a theory of uneven geographical development. London/New York: Verso.
Holt, M. (2015). Transformation of the aesthetic: Art as participatory design. Design and Culture, 7(2), 143–165.
Ihde, D. (1979). Technics and praxis: a philosophy of technology. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Krippendorff, K. (2006). The semantic turn. A new foundation for design. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.
Krippendorff, K. (2007). The cybernetics of design and the design of cybernetics. Kybernetes, 36(9/10), 1381–1392.
Kroes, P. (2012). Technical artefacts: Creations of mind and matter: A philosophy of engineering design. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3940-6_1.
Lyotard, J-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge (G. Bennington and B. Massumi, Trans.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Margolin, V. (2002). Politics of the artificial: Essays on design and design studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Martin, R. (2004). Environment, c. 1973. Grey Room, 14(Winter), 78–101.
Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way. Intentional change in an unpredictable world (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pangaro, P. (n.d.). Cybernetics—A definition. http://pangaro.com/definition-cybernetics.html .Accessed 2 Jan 2015.
Pask, G. (1963). The conception of a shape and the evolution of a design. In J. C. Jones & D. G. Thornley (Eds.), Conference on design methods (pp. 153–167). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Pawley, M. (1973). The private future: Causes and consequences of community collapse in the west. London: Thames and Hudson.
Pearce, T. (2010). From “circumstances” to “environment”: Herbert Spencer and the origins of the idea of organism-environment interaction. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 41, 241–252.
Peirce, C-S. (1931–36). The collected papers. Volumes 1–6. Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss (Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Scott, F. D. (2004). On the “counter-design” of institutions: Emilio Ambasz’s universitas symposium at MoMA. Grey Room, 14(Winter), 46–77.
Scott, F. D. (2010). Architecture or techno-utopia. Politics after modernism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Simon, H. (1981). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stanford University. (n.d.). Structured liberal education syllabus archive. https://undergrad.stanford.edu/programs/residentialprograms/sle/about-sle/syllabus-archive. Accessed 23 Apr 2016.
Stickdorn, M., & Schneider, J. (2010). This is service design thinking: Basics, tools, cases. Amsterdam: BIS publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holt, M. (2018). The Black Book: Emilio Ambasz’s University of Design. In: Vermaas, P., Vial, S. (eds) Advancements in the Philosophy of Design. Design Research Foundations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73301-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73302-9
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)