Skip to main content

Pricing Assets with Higher Co-moments and Value-at-Risk by Quantile Regression Approach: Evidence from Vietnam Stock Market

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 2430 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 760))

Abstract

This paper examines the role of higher co-moments of the shape of return distribution in capturing secondary data for 274 non-financial firms listed in the Vietnam Index, considered as one of the emerging stock markets, during the period from July 2006 to June 2016. We employ Fama-French model combined with higher co-moments, particularly co-skewness and co-kurtosis, and value-at-risk (VaR) to explain the return-generating process. Quantile regression is also used in descending order with the two methods of equally weighted and value-weighted portfolios. The findings show that investors could maximize their portfolio return by holding more stocks with the positive co-skewness and restricting the large co-kurtosis ones. It implies that in addition to co-momentum effects other determinants such as size, value and maximal value of losses also have a strong influence on stock return.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bali, T.G., Cakici, N.: Value at risk and expected stock returns. Financ. Anal. J. 60(2), 57–73 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barone-Adesi, G., Gagliardini, P., Urga, G.: Homogeneity hypothesis in the context of asset pricing models: the quadratic market model (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barone Adesi, G., Gagliardini, P., Urga, G.: Testing asset pricing models with coskewness. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 22(4), 474–485 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyer, B., Mitton, T., Vorkink, K.: Expected idiosyncratic skewness. Rev. Financ. Stud. 23(1), 169–202 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chabi-Yo, F., Ruenzi, S., Weigert, F.: Crash sensitivity and the cross-section of expected stock returns (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Conrad, J., Dittmar, R.F., Ghysels, E.: Ex ante skewness and expected stock returns. J. Financ. 68(1), 85–124 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cremers, M., Petajisto, A., Zitzewitz, E.: Should benchmark indices have alpha? Revisiting performance evaluation (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ding, B., Shawky, H.A.: The performance of hedge fund strategies and the asymmetry of return distributions. Eur. Financ. Manag. 13(2), 309–331 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dittmar, R.F.: Nonlinear pricing kernels, kurtosis preference, and evidence from the cross section of equity returns. J. Financ. 57(1), 369–403 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fama, E.F., French, K.R.: Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds. J. Financ. Econ. 33(1), 3–56 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Fama, E.F., French, K.R.: The capital asset pricing model: theory and evidence. J. Econ. Perspect. 18(3), 25–46 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fang, H., Lai, T.Y.: Co-kurtosis and capital asset pricing. Financ. Rev. 32(2), 293–307 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fletcher, J., Kihanda, J.: An examination of alternative CAPM-based models in UK stock returns. J. Bank. Financ. 29(12), 2995–3014 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Florackis, C., Gregoriou, A., Kostakis, A.: Trading frequency and asset pricing on the London Stock Exchange: evidence from a new price impact ratio. J. Bank. Financ. 35(12), 3335–3350 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Friend, I., Westerfield, R.: Co-skewness and capital asset pricing. J. Financ. 35(4), 897–913 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Garcia, R., Tsafack, G.: Dependence structure and extreme comovements in international equity and bond markets. J. Bank. Financ. 35(8), 1954–1970 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Harvey, C.R., Siddique, A.: Autoregressive conditional skewness. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 34(4), 465–487 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Harvey, C.R., Siddique, A.: Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests. J. Financ. 55(3), 1263–1295 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hung, D.C.H., Shackleton, M., Xu, X.: CAPM, higher comoment and factor models of UK stock returns. J. Bus. Financ. Acc. 31(12), 87–112 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hwang, S., Satchell, S.E.: Modelling emerging market risk premia using higher moments. Return Distributions in Finance, vol. 75 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jarjir, S.L.: Size and Book to Market Effects vs. Co-skewness and Co-kurtosis in Explaining Stock Returns (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jondeau, E., Rockinger, M.: Testing for differences in the tails of stock-market returns. J. Empir. Financ. 10(5), 559–581 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kat, H.M., Miffre, J.: The impact of non-normality risks and tactical trading on hedge fund alphas. J. Altern. Invest. 10(4), 8–21 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kole, E., Verbeek, M.: Crash risk in the cross section of stock returns. Netherlands Working Paper, Erasmus University Rotterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kostakis, A., Muhammad, K., Siganos, A.: Higher co-moments and asset pricing on London Stock Exchange. J. Bank. Financ. 36(3), 913–922 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kraus, A., Litzenberger, R.H.: Skewness preference and the valuation of risk assets. J. Financ. 31(4), 1085–1100 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lintner, J.: The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Rev. Econ. Stat. 47(1), 13–37 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. J. Financ. 7(1), 77–91 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Miller, M.B.: Mathematics and Statistics for Financial Risk Management. Wiley, Hoboken (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Mitton, T., Vorkink, K.: Equilibrium underdiversification and the preference for skewness. Rev. Financ. Stud. 20(4), 1255–1288 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Moreno, D., Rodríguez, R.: The coskewness factor: implications for performance evaluation. J. Bank. Financ. 33(9), 1664–1676 (2009a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Moreno, D., Rodríguez, R.: The value of coskewness in mutual fund performance evaluation. J. Bank. Financ. 33(9), 1664–1676 (2009b)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pettengill, G.N., Sundaram, S., Mathur, I.: The conditional relation between beta and returns. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 30(1), 101–116 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rubinstein, M.E.: The fundamental theorem of parameter-preference security valuation. J. Financ. Quant. Anal. 8(1), 61–69 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Scott, R.C., Horvath, P.A.: On the direction of preference for moments of higher order than the variance. J. Financ. 35(4), 915–919 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sharpe, W.F.: Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J. Financ. 19(3), 425–442 (1964)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toan Luu Duc Huynh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Huynh, T.L.D., Nguyen, S.P., Duong, D. (2018). Pricing Assets with Higher Co-moments and Value-at-Risk by Quantile Regression Approach: Evidence from Vietnam Stock Market. In: Anh, L., Dong, L., Kreinovich, V., Thach, N. (eds) Econometrics for Financial Applications. ECONVN 2018. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 760. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73150-6_70

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73150-6_70

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-73149-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-73150-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics