Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The Palgrave Handbook of Knowledge Management pp 667–690Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

A Critical Realist Pathway to Relevant and Ethical Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Previous research has drawn on critical realism to highlight diverse forms and types of knowledge . Scholars have also sought to assess the practical relevance and ethical dimensions of knowledge being produced across the world. This chapter offers a critical realist perspective on relevant and ethical research within the field of management. In particular, it seeks to persuade management researchers who are concerned about the research–practice gap that by adopting a critical realist perspective towards knowledge , they may be better able to recognize and explain problems of relevance to organizations and that the adoption of critical realism brings with it an explicit ethical dimension that is currently denied by positivism, and is at most implicit in interpretivism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adler, N. J., & Harzing, A.-W. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8, 72–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (1992). Critical management studies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Willmott, H. (2012). Making sense of management: A critical introduction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., & Willmott, H. (Eds.). (2009). The Oxford handbook of critical management studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N. (2005). Relationships between practice and research in personnel selection: Does the left hand know what the right is doing? In A. Evers, N. Anderson, & O. Voskuijl (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of personnel selection (pp. 1–24). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, M. S., Lawson, T., & Norrie, A. (2013). Critical realism: Essential readings. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. (1974). The limits of organization. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astley, W. G., & Zammuto, R. F. (1992). Organization science, managers, and language games. Organization Science, 3(4), 443–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., Bertels, S., Ewart, T., MacConnachie, P., & O’Brien, J. (2012). Bridging the research–practice gap. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(1), 73–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1978). A realist theory of science. New York: The Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1979). The possibility of naturalism. Brighton: The Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1986). Scientific realism and human emancipation. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1993). Dialectic: The pulse of freedom. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1998). Philosophy and scientific realism. In M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, & A. Norrie (Eds.), Critical realism: Essential readings (pp. 16–47). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (2002). From science to emancipation: Alienation and the actuality of enlightenment. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booker, L. D., Bontis, N., & Serenko, A. (2008). The relevance of knowledge management and intellectual capital research. Knowledge and Process Management, 15(4), 235–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). In other words: Essays toward a reflexive sociology (Matthew Adamson, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1996). The rules of art genesis and structure of the literary field (Susan Emanuel, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, R. (2010, October 10). Show and tell: Food firms get kids to do the talking. The Sydney Morning Herald. Available at: http://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/wellbeing/show-and-tell-food-firms-get-kids-to-do-the-talking-20101009-16d1q.html

  • Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2003). Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, M. R., Ferris, G. R., Bernardin, H. J., & Harvey, M. G. (1998, March–April, 31–38). The disconnect between the science and practice of management. Business Horizons.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (2004). Public sociologies: Contradictions, dilemma and possibilities. Social Forces, 82, 1603–1618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (2005). Public sociology. American Sociological Review, 70, 4–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. (2003, January 16–20). Invitation to research. Research presentation at the Australian National University. Xamax Consultancy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, J. P., & Lock, A. R. (2002). Advertising research and its influence upon managerial practice. Journal of Advertising Research, 42, 50–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, J. P., & Lock, A. R. (2005). The uses of marketing theory: Constructs, research propositions, and managerial implications. Marketing Theory, 5(2), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, R., Kaše, R., Kilduff, M., & King, Z. (2013). Bridging the gap between research and practice in organizational network analysis: A conversation between Rob Cross and Martin Kilduff. Human Resource Management, 52(4), 627–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, C. (2011). Structure – Part 4, Depth Ontology. Object Petit A. Available at: http://crestondavis.wordpress.com/2011/05/12/structure-part-4-depth-ontology

  • Denzin, N. K., & Giardina, M. D. (Eds.). (2016). Ethical futures in qualitative research: Decolonizing the politics of knowledge. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, P. J. (2002). Critical realism and information systems research: Why bother with philosophy. Information Research, 7(2). Available at: http://www.informationr.net/ir/7-2/paper124.html

  • Fischer, M. T. (2002, December 2002). The self-description of a management consultant. Paper for LOK Research Conference. Department of Management, Politics and Philosophy, Copenhagen Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleetwood, S., & Hesketh, A. (2006). HRM-performance research: Under-theorized and lacking explanatory power. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(12), 1977–1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, M., Young, S., & Dimitratos, P. (2016). Making research more policy relevant: A longitudinal case study of engaged scholarship. In Impact of international business (pp. 201–219). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • George, G., Haas, M. R., & Pentland, A. (2014). Big data and management. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 321–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghobadian, A. (2010, May 28). Growing gulf between managers and research. Financial Times. Available at: http://discussions.ft.com/bused/forums/soapboxforum/growing-gulf-between-managers-and-research

  • Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, W. H., & Niles, J. S. (1975). The science-technology-utilization relationship in management. Management Science, 21, 956–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. P., & Rousseau, D. M. (2009). Bridging the rigour–relevance gap in management research: It’s already happening! Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 534–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, G. P., & Starkey, K. (2011). Not simply returning to the same answer over and over again: Reframing relevance. British Journal of Management, 22(3), 355–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies, B. (2011). Critical realism – An empirical realist critique. Manchester Metropolitan University Business School Working Paper 11-03. Available at: http://www.ribm.mmu.ac.uk/wps/papers/11-03.pdf

  • Khurana, R. (2007). From higher aims to hired hands: The social transformation of American business schools and the unfulfilled promise of management as a profession. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieser, A., & Leiner, L. (2009). Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 516–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolakowski, L. (1968). The alienation of reason: A history of positivist thought. Garden City: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapsley, I., & Oldfield, R. (2001). Transforming the public sector: Management consultants as agents of change. European Accounting Review, 10(3), 523–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (Eds.). (2009). Institutional work: Actors and agency in institutional studies of organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lion, H., Donovan, J., & Bedggood, R. E. (2013). Environmental impact assessments from a business perspective: Extending knowledge and guiding business practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 117(4), 789–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipscomb, M. (2008). Mixed method nursing studies: A critical realist critique. Nursing Philosophy, 9(1), 32–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maton, K. (2001, May). The real and critical need of educational research for critical realism. The Journal of Critical Realism, 4(1), 56–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, P., & Richards, D. (2003). Critical realism: A way forward for evaluation research in nursing? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 43(4), 411–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2003). The paucity of multimethod research: A survey of the IS literature. Information Systems Journal, 13, 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2004a). Re-establishing the real: Critical realism and information systems. In J. Mingers & L. P. Willcocks (Eds.), Social theory and philosophy for information systems (pp. 372–406). Sussex: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2004b). Can social systems be Autopoietic? Bhaskar’s and Giddens’ social theories. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 34(4), 403–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2004c). Paradigm wars: Ceasefire announced, who will set up the new administration? Journal of Information Technology, 19, 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2008). Management knowledge and knowledge management: Realism and forms of truth. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 6(1), 62–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (2009). Discourse ethics and critical realist ethics: An evaluation in the context of business. Journal of Critical Realism, 8(2), 172–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., & Gill, A. (Eds.). (1997). Multimethodology: Theory and practice of combining management science methodologies. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moisander, J., & Stenfors, S. (2009). Exploring the edges of theory-practice gap: Epistemic cultures in strategy-tool development and use. Organization, 16(2), 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutch, A. (2010). Technology, organization and structure – A morphogenetic approach. Organization Science, 21(2), 507–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(1), 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özbilgin, M. F. (2009). From journal rankings to making sense of the world. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8, 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. (1878). How to make our ideas clear. Popular Science Monthly, 12, 286–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M. (2001). Management research after modernism. British Journal of Management, 12, S61–S70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. (2011). Scholarship with Impact. British Journal of Management, 22, 347–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2004). The business School ‘business’: Some lessons from the US experience. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1501–1520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. (2009). The theory/practice gap: A problem for research in business schools? Journal of Management Development, 28(8), 685–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, M., & Hatch, M. J. (2005). Building theory from practice. Strategic Organization, 3, 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer, M. E., Ordóñez, L., & Douma, B. (2004). Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior. The Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 422–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. (2000). Realism and educational research: New perspectives and possibilities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Enron ethics (or culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45(3), 243–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. L. (2006). Overcoming research–practice inconsistencies: Critical realism and information systems research. Information and Organization, 16(3), 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spicer, A., Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2009). Critical performativity: The unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations, 62(4), 537–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, K., & Madan, P. (2001). Bridging the relevance gap: Aligning stakeholders in the future of management research. British Journal of Management, 12, s3–s26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, K., & Tempest, S. (2009). From crisis to purpose. Journal of Management Development, 28(8), 700–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, K., & Tiratsoo, N. (2007). The business school and the bottom line. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Syed, J., Mingers, J., & Murray, P. (2010). Beyond rigour and relevance: A critical realist approach to business education. Management Learning, 41(1), 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenhiälä, A., Giluk, T. L., Kepes, S., Simón, C., Oh, I. S., & Kim, S. (2016). The research–practice gap in human resource management: A cross-cultural study. Human Resource Management, 55(2), 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H., & Cornuel, E. (2011). Business school futures: Evaluation and perspectives. Journal of Management Development, 30(5), 444–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, H., & Cornuel, E. (2012). Business schools in transition? Issues of impact, legitimacy, capabilities and re-Invention. Journal of Management Development, 31(4), 329–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourish, D. (2013). ‘Evidence based management’, or ‘evidence oriented organizing’? A critical realist perspective. Organization, 20(20), 173–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged scholarship: A guide to organizational and social research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Johnson, P. E. (2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkoff, O., Strong, D., & Elmes, M. (2007). Technological embeddedness and organizational change. Organization Science, 18(5), 832–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vranceanu, R. (2003). Manager unethical behavior during the new economy bubble. Essec Research Center, DR-03026 Dec 03.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, M. A., & Dehler, G. E. (2007). Whither the MBA? Or the withering of MBAs? Management Learning, 38(4), 405–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wensley, R. (2007). Beyond rigour and relevance: The underlying nature of both business schools and management research. AIM Research Working Paper Series: 051-January-2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittington, R., Pettigrew, A. M., & Thomas, H. (2001). Conclusion: Doing more in strategy research. In A. M. Pettigrew, H. Thomas, & R. Whittington (Eds.), Handbook of strategy and management (pp. 447–490). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., & Thomas, H. (2012). The legitimacy of the business of business schools: What’s the future. Journal of Management Development, 31(4), 368–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wry, T. (2009). Does business and society scholarship matter to society? Pursuing a normative agenda with critical realism and neoinstitutional theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Suleman Dawood School of Business, Lahore University of Management Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

    Jawad Syed

  2. Kent Business School, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

    John Mingers

Authors
  1. Jawad Syed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Mingers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Suleman Dawood School of Business, Lahore University of Management Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan

    Jawad Syed

  2. School of Management and Enterprise, Faculty of Business, Education, Law and the Arts, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia

    Peter A. Murray

  3. School of Business and Economics, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, United Kingdom

    Donald Hislop

  4. Muscat University, St Helens, Merseyside, United Kingdom

    Yusra Mouzughi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Syed, J., Mingers, J. (2018). A Critical Realist Pathway to Relevant and Ethical Research. In: Syed, J., Murray, P., Hislop, D., Mouzughi, Y. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Knowledge Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71434-9_27

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation