Skip to main content

For the Attention of African Media Scholars: An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Media and Communication Research in Africa

Abstract

Contemporary communication research in Africa is heavily influenced by theories and methodologies developed in the West. There are several reasons for this. The first is the colonial relationship between African countries and their former European colonisers: most African countries were at some point colonised by Britain, France, Portugal and Italy and so their media systems were shaped by those of the former colonisers. Second, the contemporary educational system in African countries was established according to colonial models. Thirdly, media scholars in Africa were trained in Western universities, therefore transferring the theories and methodologies they learnt during their years of research in the West back to the continent. As discussed by Obeng-Quaidoo (1986), by the time African scholars return to the continent from the West, it takes them at least six years to digest the concepts and theories they have learnt and discover whether they are workable in the continent or not. The use of English, French, Portuguese and other foreign languages as the medium of instruction in universities is another factor that contributes to the domination of Western theories and methodologies in communication research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Wodak (2001b) gave a detailed description of how a network of scholars came together in 1991 after a symposium at the University of Amsterdam to discuss issues on discourse analysis, and specifically CDA, by looking at the theories of language and how it is used in social life. These scholars include Teun Van Dijk, Gunther Kress, Norman Fairclough, Theo Van Leeuwen and Ruth Wodak.

  2. 2.

    This information was received through an enquiry via WhatsApp with a journalist based in Kenya on 17 August 2017.

  3. 3.

    See Kenya’s newspapers give voters the front pages they want to sell more copies, available at https://qz.com/1047749/election-in-kenya-2017-newspapers-like-standard-and-the-nation-tailor-covers-for-their-regional-audience/. Accessed 17 August 2017.

References

  • Ansu-Kyeremeh, K. (2005). Indigenous communication in Africa. Accra: Ghana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourghault, L. M. (1995). Mass media in sub-Saharan Africa. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunce, M., Suzanne, F., & Paterson, C. (Eds.). (2017). Africa’s media image in the 21st century. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chouliarki, L. (2000). Political discourse in the news: Democratising responsibility or aestheticizing politics? Discourse and Society, 11(3), 293–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2000). New labour new language? London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2016). Language and power (3rd ed.). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, B. (2004). Packaging politics: Political communication in Britain’s media. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, D., & Papathanassopoulos, S. (2002). Political clientelism and media: Southern Europe and Latin America in comparative perspective. Media, Culture & Society, 24, 175–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (2002). Manufacturing consent. The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyden, G., Leslie, M., & Ogundinmu, F. F. (Eds.). (2002). Media and democracy in Africa. Uppsala: Nordiska Afrikainstitute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, C. H. (2002). Building the fourth estate. Democratisation and the rise of free press in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (2001). Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 15–31). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P., Curtis, J., Sanders, D., Scammell, M., & Semetco, H. A. (1999). On message: Communicating the campaign. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okigbo, C. C., & Eribo, F. (Eds.). (2004). Development and communication in Africa. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littleman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oktar, L. (2001). The ideological organisation of representational processes in the presentation of us and them. Discourse and Society, 12(3), 313–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omu, F. I. (1978). Press and politics in Nigeria: 1886–1937. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obeng-Quaidoo, I. (1986). A Proposal for new communication research methodologies in Africa. Africa Media Review, 1(1), 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2016). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 23–61). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. E. (2007). Analysing newspapers. An Approach from critical discourse analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. P. (1998). African political cultures and the problems of government. African Studies Quarterly, 2(3), 17–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjerdal, T. S. (2010). Research on brown envelop journalism in the African media. African Communication Research, 3(33), 367–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomaselli, K. G. (2002). A brief history of South African journalism, mass communication and media education. African Communication Scholars Association, 4(1), 111–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 249–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Multidesciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 95–120).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waisbord, S. (2000). Watchdog journalism in South America. News accountability and democracy. New York: Colombia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, H., & Maweu, J. M. (2014). The freedom to be silent? Market pressures on journalistic normative ideals at the Nation Media Group in Kenya. Review of African Political Economy, 41(142), 623–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasswa, J. B., & Kakooza, M. (2011, November). Media and corruption. Uganda Media Review, No. 11, 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. I. (2014). Brown envelop and the future of journalism in Nigeria. Interdisciplinary Journal of Scientific Research, 1(1), 148–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R. (2001a). Aspects of critical discourse analysis. Retrieved from December 20, 2017, from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.121.1792&rep=rep1&type=pdf

  • Wodak, R. (2001b). What CDA is about-a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–13). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 15–31). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusha’u, M. J. (2009). Investigative journalism and scandal reporting in the Nigerian press. Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies, 30(2), 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusha’u, M. J. (2010a). Regional parallelism and the reporting of corruption in the Nigerian press. Journal of African Media Studies, 2(3), 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusha’u, M. J. (2010b). Coverage of corruption scandals in the Nigerian press. A comparative analysis of Northern and Southern Newspapers. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yusha’u, M.J. (2018). For the Attention of African Media Scholars: An Introduction to Critical Discourse Analysis. In: Mutsvairo, B. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Media and Communication Research in Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70443-2_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics