Skip to main content

A Post-contentious Turning Point for the Contentious French? Crisis Without Protest in France

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Citizens and the Crisis

Abstract

This chapter shows that the ‘contentious French’ may not be that contentious anymore. The economic crisis provides a unique chance to argue that a post-contentious turning point is emerging in spite of a long-standing tradition of protesting. Yet the chapter suggests that this post-contentious turning point is not bringing about acquiescence but opens space for new forms of political participation, especially in connection with resources acquired through employment and educational track. In this case, we find a more extensive engagement in online activism and non-institutional forms of political participation, that is, the two forms of political participation that are less ‘active’ and require a more modest time commitment. These findings are also put in the broader context of contemporary French politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This rate has reached 85 per cent in 2016. Cf. available data online at http://www.internetlivestats.com/internet-users-by-country

  2. 2.

    The percentage is more or less the same among the French population.

  3. 3.

    See, for example, the strikes in the public sector or the 2006 protest against the reform of the labour law (Lindvall 2011).

  4. 4.

    But see the exception of protests in Bayonne lasting over six weeks.

  5. 5.

    On 15 October 2011, anti-austerity mobilisation organised simultaneously in several dozen countries made it possible to measure the level of mobilisation on a world scale. In Paris and in France’s main provincial towns, however, no gathering of more than 3,000 people was recorded, while in other European cities attendance was much multiplied in some cases by hundreds. Suffice it to put emphasis on numbers in Madrid (500,000), Barcelona (300,000), Rome (100,000), and Lisbon (80,000).

  6. 6.

    For more details about question wordings, answer categories, and descriptive statistics of these behavioural variables, we refer to the Appendix.

  7. 7.

    17 per cent voted for Marine Le Pen (+11 points compared to 2007). More than a third of them (35 per cent) used the 2012 presidential election to express their discontent and vent their worries, in the process disposing of the tag of ‘vote utile’ (useful vote), which the two main parties in the past took for granted. To put this in perspective again, in 2007, only 20 per cent ventured from the mainstream parties (Perrineau 2014).

References

  • Allwood, G., Wadia, K., & Wadia, K. (2000). Women and Politics in France 1958–2000. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balme, R., & Chabanet, D. (2008). European Governance and Democracy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béroud, S., Denis, J. M., Desage, G., Giraud, B., & Pélisse, J. (2008). La lutte continue? Les conflits du travail dans la France contemporaine. Broissieux: Le Croquant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, S. J., & Krueger, B. S. (2005). Analyzing the Representativeness of Internet Political Participation. Political Behavior, 27(2), 183–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blondeau, O., & Allard, L. (2007). Devenir Média. L’activisme sur Internet, entre défection et expérimentation. Paris: Editions Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1978). La jeunesse n’est qu’un mot. In Les jeunes et le premier emploi (entretien avec Anne-Marie Métailié). Paris: Association des Anges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braconnier, C. (2010). Une autre sociologie du vote. Les électeurs dans leurs contextes: bilan critique et perspectives. Paris: LGDJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braconnier, C., & Dormagen, J.-Y. (2014). Une démocratie de l’abstention. Retour sur le non-vote et ses conséquences politiques lors des scrutins municipaux et européens de 2014. Hérodote, 3, 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braconnier, C., & Mayer, N. (Eds.). (2015). Les inaudibles. Sociologie politique des précaires. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, H. E. (1999). Political Participation. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of Political Attitudes. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bréchon, P. (1998). Les jeunes et la politique en Europe et en France. Agora débats/jeunesses, 12(1), 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, D., & Granjon, F. (2014). Médiactivistes. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre d’études et de recherches sur les qualifications (CEREQ). (2011). Le diplôme, un atout gagnant pour les jeunes face à la crise. Premiers résultats de l’enquête 2010 auprès de la « génération 2007 ». Paris: Ministère de l’Éducation nationale, de la Jeunesse et de la Vie associative, du ministère du Travail de l’Emploi et de la Santé.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabanet, D., & Giugni, M. (2013). Patterns of Change in Youth Unemployment Regimes: France and Switzerland Compared. International Journal of Social Welfare, 22, 310–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chabanet, D., & Lacheret, A. (2016). The Occupy Movement in France. Why Protests Have Not Taken Off. In M. Ancelovici, P. Dufour, & H. Nez (Eds.), Street Politics in the Age of Austerity. Croydon: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, A., & Howard, P. N. (2010). Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinalli, M. (2004). Horizontal Networks Vs. Vertical Networks in Multi-Organisational Alliances: A Comparative Study of the Unemployment and Asylum Issue-Fields in Britain. EurPolCom, 8(4), Leeds: University of Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinalli, M. (2007). Between Horizontal Bridging and Vertical Governance: Pro-Beneficiary Movements in New Labour Britain. In D. Purdue (Ed.), Civil Societies and Social Movements: Potentials and Problems. Houndmills: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinalli, M., & Giugni, M. (2016). Collective Responses to the Economic Crisis in the Public Domain: Myth or Reality? Politics and Policy, 44(3), 427–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffé, H., & Bolzendahl, C. (2010). Same Game, Different Rules? Gender Differences in Political Participation. Sex Roles, 62(5–6), 318–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Converse, P. (1972). Change in the American Electorate. In A. Campbell & P. Converse (Eds.), The Human Meaning of Change. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davezies, L., & Guilluy, C. (2013). La France périphérique et marginalisée: les raisons du ressentiment. Esprit, 3(393), 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delwit, P. (2013). The End of Voters in Europe? Electoral Turnout in Europe Since WWII. Open Journal of Political Science, 3, 44–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faucher, F. (2015). New Forms of Political Participation. Changing Demands or Changing Opportunities to Participate in Political Parties? Comparative European Politics, 13(4), 405–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fillieule, O. (1997). Stratégies de la rue. Les manifestations en France. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fillieule, O., & Tartakowsky, D. (2008). La manifestation. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fouetillou, G. (2008). Le web et le traité constitutionnel européen. Écologie d’une localité thématique compétitive. Réseaux, 1(147), 229–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M. N. (2004). Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallego, A. (2007). Unequal Participation in Europe. International Journal of Sociology, 37(4), 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaxie, D. (2007). Cognitions, auto-habilitation et pouvoirs des «citoyens». Revue française de science politique, 57, 737–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. K., Lusoli, W., & Ward, S. (2005). Online Participation in the UK: Testing a ‘Contextualised’ Model of Internet Effects. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(4), 561–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R., Michalska, K., & Vedel, T. (2014). Online Campaigning in France, 2007–2012: Political Actors and Citizens in the Aftermath of the Web.2.0 Evolution. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 11(2), 220–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greffet, F. (Ed.). (2011). Continuerlalutte.com. Les partis politiques sur le web. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greffet, F., Wojcik, S., & Blanchard, G. (2014). S’engager dans la campagne présidentielle. Les formes multiples de la participation politique en ligne. Politiques de communication, 3, 25–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (INSEE—Martinelli, D., & Minni, C.). (2013). Face à la crise, le diplôme protège du chômage et favorise l’accès à la formation continue [online]. Available: http://www.insee.fr/fr/ffc/docs_ffc/FORMEMP13_a_Diplome_chomage.pdf. 30 Oct 2016.

  • Ion, J. (2012). S’engager dans une société d’individus. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouet, J., Vedel, T., & Comby, J. B. (2011). Political Information and Interpersonal Conversations in a Multimedia Environment: A Quantitative and Qualitative Examination of Information Practices in France. European Journal of Communication, 26(4), 361–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H. P. (1986). Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 16(1), 57–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J. W., & Giugni, M. (1995). New Social Movements in Western Europe. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, R. (2004). Vive la Différence’ ? The Mediation of Politicians’ Public Images and Private Lives in France. Parliamentary Affairs, 57, 24–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancelot, A. (1968). L’abstentionnisme électoral en France. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Hay, V., Vedel, T., & Chanvril, F. (2011). Usages des médias et politique: une écologie des pratiques informationnelles. Réseaux, 170, 45–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1997). Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma Presidential Address. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindvall, J. (2011). The Political Foundations of Trust and Distrust: Reforms and Protests in France. West European Politics, 34(2), 296–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabi, C., & Theviot, A. (Eds.). (2014). S’engager sur Internet. Mobilisations numériques et pratiques politiques. Grenoble: Presses universitaires de Grenoble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2002). In the Aggregate: Mass Electoral Behaviour in Western Europe, 1950–2000. In H. Keman (Ed.), Comparative Democratic Politics. A Guide to Contemporary Theory and Research. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2013). Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, N. (2010). Sociologie des comportements politiques. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Melo, D. F., & Stockemer, D. (2014). Age and Political Participation in Germany, France and the UK: A Comparative Analysis. Comparative European Politics, 12(1), 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michalska, K., Chiche, J., & Vedel, T. (2015). Connaissances politiques et participation politique: ce que change l’internet. Sciences de la société, 94, 177–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Missika, J.-L. (1992, January–February). Les faux-semblants de la ‘dépolitisation’. Le débat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monnoyer-Smith, L., & Wojcik, S. (2012). Technology and the Quality of Public Deliberation: A Comparison Between On and Offline Participation. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 5(1), 24–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muxel, A. (2010). Avoir 20 ans en politique. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muxel, A. (2011). La politique au fil de l’âge. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muxel, A. (2015). Les jeunes et la politique: vers un nouveau modèle de citoyenneté dans les démocraties avancées. In Points de vue sur la jeunesse: vol 2—Connexions et déconnexions. Strasbourg: Conseil de l’Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, T. (2007). Rough Days in Democracies: Comparing Protests in Democracies. European Journal of Political Research, 46(1), 97–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pélabay, J. (2014). Privatiser les valeurs publiques La citoyenneté comme intime conviction? In A. Muxel (Ed.), La vie privée des convictions. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierru, E. (2005). Guerre aux chômeurs ou guerre au chômage. Broissieux: Editions du Croquant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. (1971). Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintelier, E. (2007). Differences in Political Participation Between Young and Old People. Contemporary Politics, 13(2), 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, P. (2006). La Contre-Démocratie. La politique à l’âge de la défiance. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, R. (2015). Le bon gouvernement. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (2010). Weapon of the Strong? Participatory Inequality and the Internet. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 487–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, T. (1994). Power in Movement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teorell, J., Torcal, M., & Montero, J. R. (2007). Political Participation. Mapping the Terrain. In J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero, & A. Westholm (Eds.), Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies: A Comparative Analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1986). The Contentious French. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • van Deth, J. W. (2014). A Conceptual Map of Political Participation. Acta Politica, 49(3), 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., Nie, N., & Kim, J.-O. (1978). Participation and Political Equality: A Seven Nation Comparison. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wattenberg, M. P. (2002). Where Have All the Voters Gone? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojcik, S., & Greffet, F. (2008). Parler politique…en ligne: une revue des travaux français et anglo-saxons. Réseaux, 26(150), 19–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chabanet, D., Cinalli, M., Muxel, A., Van Hauwaert, S.M., Vedel, T. (2018). A Post-contentious Turning Point for the Contentious French? Crisis Without Protest in France. In: Giugni, M., Grasso, M. (eds) Citizens and the Crisis. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68960-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics