Abstract
>Sonography (Ultrasound-US) is considered as a first-line imaging modality for the evaluation of female pelvis. It has a significant role in the management of patients with vaginal bleeding, especially in postmenopausal population and for detection of endometrial cancer. Also, it is useful in identifying and characterizing ovarian lesions in up to 75% of the cases. However, sonography exhibits considerable limitations in evaluating uterine cervix or localizing quite large pelvic masses; furthermore, its role in staging and follow up of gynecologic malignancies is still restricted. The development of more sophisticated techniques, like contrast-enhanced or three dimensional US, may improve diagnostic efficacy in the future.The aim of this chapter is to describe common sonographic features of uterine and ovarian malignancies and to review the diagnostic efficacy of sonography in such cases.
Ultrasonography (US) is considered as the initial imaging method for the evaluation of the female pelvis. It is a noninvasive, easily repeatable, cheap, and widely available imaging modality, which provides a quick overview of the female reproductive system. Since it lacks ionization, it is a safe method for the evaluation of young females and pregnant patients (Fielding et al. Gynecologic imaging. Expert radiology series. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, PA, 2011; Fischerova, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 38:246–266, 2011).
Bimanual clinical examination has low sensitivity in recognizing uterine and ovarian tumors (Padilla et al., Obstet Gynecol 96:593–598, 2000). On the contrary, US can easily detect and characterize pelvic masses of uterine or adnexal origin, predicting also their benign or malignant nature.
US may be susceptible to pitfalls since it is dependent on the operator’s experience, equipment, and patient’s body mass index. During the last decades, there was a significant improvement in technical quality parameters; therefore, US can be used as a reliable tool for the depiction and classification of most gynecological tumors, for follow-up examination, and even for the detection of recurrence in oncologic patients, especially when carried out by a sonographer dedicated in gynecologic oncology (Fischerova, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 38:246–266, 2011).
The aim of this chapter is to describe typical sonographic features of common uterine and ovarian malignancies in pre- and postmenopausal population and to review the diagnostic efficacy of sonography in such cases.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Fielding J, Brown D, Thurmond A (2011) Gynecologic imaging. Expert radiology series. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, PA
Fischerova D (2011) Ultrasound scanning of the pelvis and abdomen for staging of gynecological tumors: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 38:246–266
Derchi L, Serafini G, Gandolfo N et al (2001) Ultrasound in gynecology. Eur Radiol 11:2137–2155
Timmermans A, Opmeer BC, Khan KS, Bachmann LM, Epstein E, Clark TJ et al (2010) Endometrial thickness measurement for detecting endometria cancer in women with postmenopausal bleeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 116(1):160–167
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice (2006) ACOG committee opinion no. 336: tamoxifen and uterine cancer. Obstet Gynecol 107(6):1475–1478
Liu ZZ, Jiang YX, Qing D et al (2011) Imaging in endometrial carcinoma using contrast-enhanced sonography. J Ultrasound Med 30(11):1519–1527
Rumack C, Wilson S, Chaborneau JW (1998) Diagnostic ultrasound, vol 1, 2nd edn. Mosby Inc., St. Louis, MO
Loubeyre P, Navarria I, Undurraga M et al (2012) Is imaging relevant for treatment choice in early stage cervical uterine cancer? Surg Oncol 21:e1–e6
McCluggage WG, Fisher C, & Hirschowitz LDL, On behalf of the Working Group for Cancer Services of The Royal College of Pathologists (2014) Dataset for histological reporting of uterine sarcomas. http://www.rcpath.org/Resources/RCPath/Migrated%20Resources/Documents/G/G106_UterineSarcomaDataset_Dec14.pdf
Hricak H (2007) Diagnostic imaging. Gynecology, 1st edn. Amirsys Inc., Salt Lake City, UT
Initial Evaluation and Referral Guidelines for Management of Pelvic/Ovarian Masses (2009) JOGC JULY JUILLET no. 230
Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T et al (2008) Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstetr Gynecol 31(6):681–690
Togashi K (2003) Ovarian cancer: the clinical role of US, CT, and MRI. Eur Radiol 13:L87–L104
Fleischer A, Lyshchik A, Hirari M et al (2012) Early detection of ovarian cancer and contrast-enhanced transvaginal sonography: recent advances and potential improvements. J Oncol 302858:11
Marret H, Sauget S, Giraudeau B et al (2004) Contrast-enhanced sonography helps in discrimination of benign from malignant adnexal masses. JUM 23(12):1629–1639
Buys SS, Partridge E, Black A et al (2011) Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening randomized controlled trial. JAMA 305(22):2295–2303
Van Nagel JR, Pavlik EJ (2012) Ovarian cancer screening. Clin Obstet Gynecol 55(1):43–51
Tempany CM, Zou KH, Silverman SG et al (2000) Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: comparison of imaging modalities-report from the radiological diagnostic oncology group. Radiology 215:761–767
Kurtz AB, Tsimikas JV, Tempany CM et al (1999) Diagnosis and staging of ovarian cancer: comparative values of Doppler and conventional US, CT, and MR imaging correlated with surgery and histopathologic analysis – report from the radiological diagnostic oncology group. Radiology 212:19–27
Fehm T, Heller F, Kramer S et al (2005) Evaluation of CA125, physical and radiological findings in follow up of ovarian cancer patients. Anticancer Res 25:1551–1554
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bourgioti, C.I., Antoniou, A. (2018). US Findings in Gynecologic Cancer. In: Gouliamos, A., Andreou, J., Kosmidis, P. (eds) Imaging in Clinical Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68873-2_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68873-2_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68872-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68873-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)