Skip to main content

Illuminant Color Inconsistency as a Powerful Clue for Detecting Digital Image Forgery: A Survey

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications (ISTA 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 683))

  • 1005 Accesses

Abstract

Digital images capture our attention and are retained in our memory for longer than other sensory perceptions. Despite numerous instances of image forgery, still, people tend to believe digital images. At the same time, digital investigations reveal an increasing trend of image forgery with illicit purposes. Image editing operations that lead to forgery always leave traces. Investigators rely upon these traces for detecting an image forgery. Researchers are trying to detect image forgery by devising techniques that exploit the traces present in forged images. Recently, illuminant color, the color of the scene illumination present in the image that hints the illumination prevailed at the time of image capture is studied as potential evidence for image forgery. In this survey, we explore the evolution of illuminant color based image forgery detection. This survey provides a brief description of different illuminant color estimation approaches employed in image forgery detection followed by a detailed review of existing illuminant color inconsistency based forgery detection techniques. The major contribution of this survey is the elaborate discussion of future research directions to provide insight to researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beigpour, S., Riess, C., van de Weijer, J., Angelopoulou, E.: Multi-illuminant estimation with conditional random fields. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23(1), 83–96 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bianco, S., Schettini, R.: Adaptive color constancy using faces. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 36(8), 1505–18 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Birajdar, G.K., Mankar, V.H.: Digital image forgery detection using passive techniques: a survey. Digital Invest. 10(3), 226–245 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bleier, M., Riess, C., Beigpour, S., Eibenberger, E., Angelopoulou, E., Tröger, T., Kaup, A.: Color constancy and non-uniform illumination: can existing algorithms work? In: Proceedings of IEEE Color and Photometry in Computer Vision Workshop, pp. 774–81 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buchsbaum, G.: A spatial processor model for object colour perception. J. Franklin Inst. 310(1), 1–26 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cao, G., Zhao, Y., Ni, R.: Image composition detection using object-based color consistency. In: 2008 9th International Conference on Signal Processing., pp. 1186–1189, October 2008

    Google Scholar 

  7. Çarkacıoǧlu, A., Yarman-Vural, F.: Sasi: a generic texture descriptor for image retrieval. Pattern Recognit. 36(11), 2615–33 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carvalho, T., Faria, F.A., Pedrini, H., Torres, R.D.S., Rocha, A.: Illuminantbased transformed spaces for image forensics. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 11(4), 720–33 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carvalho, T., Pedrini, H., Rocha, A.: Illumination inconsistency sleuthing for exposing fauxtography and uncovering composition telltales in digital images. In: Workshop of Theses and Dissertations-XXVII SIBGRAPI Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ciurea, F., Funt, B.: A large image database for color constancy research. In: Color and Imaging Conference, Society for Imaging Science and Technology, vol. 2003, pp. 160–164 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cook, R.L., Torrance, K.E.: A reflectance model for computer graphics. ACM Trans. Graph. (TOG) 1(1), 7–24 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dalal, N., Triggs, B.: Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2005), vol. 1, pp. 886–893, June 2005

    Google Scholar 

  13. De Carvalho, T.J., Riess, C., Angelopoulou, E., Pedrini, H., de Rezende Rocha, A.: Exposing digital image forgeries by illumination color classification. IEEE Transa. Inf. Forensics Secur. 8(7), 1182–94 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dong, J., Wang, W., Tan, T.: Casia image tampering detection evaluation database. In: 2013 IEEE China Summit & International Conference on Signal and Information Processing (ChinaSIP), pp. 422–426. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eibenberger, E., Angelopoulou, E.: Beyond the neutral interface reflection assumption in illuminant color estimation. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 4689–4692 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fan, Y., Carré, P., Fernandez-Maloigne, C.: Image splicing detection with local illumination estimation. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pp. 2940–2944, September 2015

    Google Scholar 

  17. Farid, H.: Image forgery detection. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 26(2), 16–25 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Finlayson, G.D., Schaefer, G.: Solving for colour constancy using a constrained dichromatic reflection model. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 42(3), 127–144 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Francis, K., Gholap, S., Bora, P.K.: Illuminant colour based image forensics using mismatch in human skin highlights. In: 2014 Twentieth National Conference on Communications (NCC), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gholap, S., Bora, P.K.: Illuminant colour based image forensics. In: TENCON 2008–2008 IEEE Region 10 Conference, pp. 1–5, November 2008

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gijsenij, A., Gevers, T., van de Weijer, J.: Computational color constancy: survey and experiments. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 20(9), 2475–89 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Gijsenij, A., Gevers, T.: Color constancy using natural image statistics and scene semantics. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 33(4), 687–98 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang, J., Kumar, S.R., Mitra, M., Zhu, W.J., Zabih, R.: Image indexing using color correlograms. In: Proceedings of 1997 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 762–768, June 1997

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mazin, B., Delon, J., Gousseau, Y.: Estimation of illuminants from projections on the planckian locus. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 24(6), 1944–55 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Mazumdar, A., Bora, P.K.: Exposing splicing forgeries in digital images through dichromatic plane histogram discrepancies. In: Proceedings of the Tenth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, p. 62. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Morrison, K.: How many photos are uploaded to snapchat every second? (2015). http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/how-many-photos-are-uploaded-to-snapchat-every-second/621488

  27. Pass, G., Zabih, R., Miller, J.: Comparing images using color coherence vectors. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 65–73. ACM (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Qureshi, M.A., Deriche, M.: A bibliography of pixel-based blind image forgery detection techniques. Signal Process. Image Commun. 39, 46–74 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Redi, J.A., Taktak, W., Dugelay, J.L.: Digital image forensics: a booklet for beginners. Multimedia Tools Appl. 51(1), 133–162 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Riess, C.: Physics-based and Statistical Features for Image Forensics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Riess, C., Angelopoulou, E.: Scene illumination as an indicator of image manipulation. Inf. Hiding 6387, 66–80 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Riess, C., Unberath, M., Naderi, F., Pfaller, S., Stamminger, M., Angelopoulou, E.: Handling multiple materials for exposure of digital forgeries using 2-D lighting environments. Multimedia Tools Appl., 1–18 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rocha, A., Scheirer, W., Boult, T., Goldenstein, S.: Vision of the unseen: current trends and challenges in digital image and video forensics. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 43(4), 26 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shafer, S.A.: Using color to separate reflection components. Color Res. Appl. 10(4), 210–18 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Stehling, R.O., Nascimento, M.A., Falcão, A.X.: A compact and efficient image retrieval approach based on border/interior pixel classification. In: Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on Information and knowledge management, pp. 102–09. ACM (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Swain, M.J., Ballard, D.H.: Color indexing. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 7(1), 11–32 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Taimori, A., Razzazi, F., Behrad, A., Ahmadi, A., Babaie-Zadeh, M.: A novel forensic image analysis tool for discovering double jpeg compression clues. Multimedia Tools Appl., 1–35 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tan, R.T., Nishino, K., Ikeuchi, K.: Color constancy through inverse-intensity chromaticity space. J. Opt. Soci. Am. A 21(3), 321–34 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tralic, D., Zupancic, I., Grgic, S., Grgic, M.: Comofod; new database for copy-move forgery detection. In: ELMAR, 2013 55th International Symposium, pp. 49–54, September 2013

    Google Scholar 

  40. Van De Weijer, J., Gevers, T., Gijsenij, A.: Edge-based color constancy. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16(9), 2207–14 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Vidyadharan, D.S., Thampi, S.M.: Detecting spliced face in a group photo using PCA. In: 2015 7th International Conference of Soft Computing and Pattern Recognition (SoCPaR), pp. 175–180, November 2015

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vidyadharan, D., Thampi, S.: Brightness distribution based image tampering detection. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Informatics, Communication and Energy Systems (SPICES), pp. 1–5, February 2015

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wu, X., Fang, Z.: Image splicing detection using illuminant color inconsistency. In: 2011 Third International Conference on Multimedia Information Networking and Security (MINES), pp. 600–603. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Higher Education Department, Government of Kerala for funding this research and the Department of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Trivandrum for providing the facilities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Divya S. Vidyadharan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vidyadharan, D.S., Thampi, S.M. (2018). Illuminant Color Inconsistency as a Powerful Clue for Detecting Digital Image Forgery: A Survey. In: Thampi, S., Mitra, S., Mukhopadhyay, J., Li, KC., James, A., Berretti, S. (eds) Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications. ISTA 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 683. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68385-0_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68385-0_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68384-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68385-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics