Skip to main content

Current and Future Evidence in Personal Injury Ascertainment Under Criminal Law

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 610 Accesses

Abstract

The forensic medical examination of victims of violence for the purposes of gathering evidence for use in criminal proceedings requires a prompt physical examination of the victim, a precise description and, where possible, photodocumentation of injuries, as well as their correct medico-legal interpretation according to the incident. Such examinations, documentation, and appraisals are required to meet minimum standards, which may be subject to modification in the case of suspected child abuse and for the purposes of examining victims of sexual violence. It is also essential to ensure that the examiner or expert possesses material autonomy, as well as administrative and organizational independence. An independent expert should not belong to the police force, the public prosecutor’s office, or the court in any organizational capacity. Statutory provisions need to exclude the possibility of influencing an expert “through official channels”, while at the same time his financial independence should be such that attempts at corruption are at least unlikely. The independence of the expert is of particular importance in cases where individuals have been the victim of violence in official custody, most notably in police custody, in prisons, and following involuntary detention in a psychiatric institution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tedeschi LG (1984) Human rights and the forensic scientist. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 5(4):295–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thomsen JL, Helweg-Larsen K, Rasmussen OV (1984) Amnesty International and the forensic sciences. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 5(4):305–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (2004) Manual of the effective investigation and documentation of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (Istanbul Protocol), HR/P/PT/8/Rev.1

    Google Scholar 

  4. European Council of Legal Medicine (ECLM) Guidelines Examination of Living Persons. Harmonisation of Forensic and Medico-Legal Examination of persons. Available via DIALOG. http://eclm.info/docs/GUIDELINES/8_Forensic_examiantion_living_person.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2016

  5. Forrest D, Knight B, Hinshelwood G, Anand J, Tonge V (1995) A guide to writing medical reports on survivors of torture. Forensic Sci Int 76:69–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oehmichen M (1999) The forensic physician’s conception of himself. Documentation and prevention of maltreatment and torture as a special task. Forensic Sci Int 100:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Morentin B, Petersen HD, Callado LF, Idoyaga MI, Meana JJ (2008) A follow-up investigation on the quality of medical documents from examinations of Basque incommunicado detainees: the role of the medical doctors and national and international authorities in the prevention of ill-treatment and torture. Forensic Sci Int 182(1–3):57–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chariot P, Martel P, Penneau M, Debout M (2008) Guidelines for doctors attending detainees in police custody: a consensus conference in France. Int J Leg Med 122:73–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Perera C, Verghese A (2011) Implementation of Istanbul Protocol for effective documentation of torture—review of Sri Lankan perspectives. J Forensic Leg Med 18(1):1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ingemann-Hansen O, Charles AV (2013) Forensic medical examination of adolescent and adult victims of sexual violence. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 27(1):91–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Verhoff MA, Kettner M, Lászik A, Ramsthaler F (2012) Digital photo documentation of forensically relevant injuries as part of the clinical first response protocol. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 109(39):638–642

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dettmeyer R (2013) Torture. International rules, institutions, forms and injuries. Rechtsmedizin 23:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dettmeyer RB, Verhoff MA, Schütz H (2014) Torture. Forensic medicine. Fundamentals and Perspectives. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 439–447

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Dettmeyer RB, Verhoff MA, Schütz H (2014) Clinical forensic medicine. Forensic medicine. Fundamentals and perspectives. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 269–284

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mangin P, Bonbled F, Väli M, Luna A, Bajanowski T, Hougen HP, Ludes B, Ferrara D, Cusack D, Keller E, Viera N (2015) European Council of Legal Medicine (ECLM) accreditation of forensic pathology services in Europe. Int J Leg Med 129:395–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobi G, Dettmeyer R, Banaschak S, Brosig B, Herrmann B (2010) Child abuse and neglect: diagnosis and management. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 107(13):231–240

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Council of Europe (2007) Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of Children against Sexual Exploitation and Sexual Abuse. https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=0900001680084822. Accessed 16 Nov 2016

  18. Carr ME, Moettus A (2010) Developing a policy for sexual assault examinations on incapacitated patients and patients unable to consent. J Law Med Ethics 38(3):647–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Levine LJ (1984) The role of the forensic odontologist in human rights investigations. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 5(4):317–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines for medico-legal care for victims of sexual violence. Available via DIALOG. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42788/1/924154628X.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2016

  21. Fergusson DM, Lynskey MT, Horwood LJ (1996) Childhood sexual abuse and psychiatric disorder in young adulthood: I. Prevalence of sexual abuse and factors associated with sexual abuse. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 35(10):1355–1364

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Adams JA (1999) Medical evaluation of suspected child abuse: it’s time for standardized training, referral centers, and routine peer reviews. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 153:1121–1122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) (1999) Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. Guidelines for the evaluation of sexual abuse in children. Pediatrics 103:186–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Banaschak S, Brinkmann B (1999) The role of clinical forensic medicine in cases of sexual child abuse. Forensic Sci Int 99:85–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Palusci VJ, Cox EO, Shatz EM, Schultze JM (2006) Urgent medical assessment after child sexual abuse. Child Abuse Negl 30:367–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Volpellier M (2009) Physical forensic signs of sexual torture in children. A guideline for non specialized medical examiners. Torture 19:157–166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dettmeyer R (2006) Medizinische Maßnahmen zum Zwecke der Beweissicherung. In: Dettmeyer R (ed) Medizin & Recht. Springer, Heidelberg New York, pp 311–336

    Google Scholar 

  28. Moisander PA, Edston E (2003) Torture and its sequel—a comparison between victims from six countries. Forensic Sci Int 137:133–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kaiser G, Rebmann M (1998) Genügen die deutschen Regelungen zur Rolle des Arztes bei der Vorbeugung von Mißhandlungen durch Polizei und Strafvollzugspersonal den europäischen Anforderungen? Neue Z Strafrecht (NStZ) 18:105–112

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vogel H (2003) A radiologic atlas of abuse, torture, terrorism, and inflicted trauma. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vogel H (2008) Violence, war, borders. Evidence and Threat. Shaker, Aachen, X-Rays

    Google Scholar 

  32. Ross DL, Chan TC (2006) Sudden deaths in custody. Humana Press, Totowa

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Chariot P, Beaufrère A, Denis C, Dang C, Vincent R, Boraud C (2014) Detainees in police custody in the Paris, France area: medical data and high-risk situations (a prospective study over 1 year). Int J Leg Med 128:853–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Heide S, Stiller D, Lessig R, Lautenschläger C, Birkholz M, Früchtnicht W (2012) Medical examination of fitness for police custody in two large German towns. Int J Leg Med 126:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Heide S, Chariot P, Green P, Fabian J, Payne-James JJ (2016) Healthcare and forensic medical aspects of police detainees, suspects and complainants in Europe. J Forens Leg Med doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2016.01.022. (In press)

  36. Mills EJ, Singh S, Holtz TH, Chase RM, Dolma S, Santa-Barbara J, Orbinski JJ (2005) Prevalence of mental disorders and torture among Tibetan refugees: a systematic review. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 5:7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam (1990) U.N. GAOR, World Conf. On Human Rights, 4th Sess., Agenda Item 5, U.N. Doc.A/Conf.157/PC/62/Add.18 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Genfer Erklärung zur Gesundheitsversorgung in Haft (2012) Available via DIALOG. http://ump.hug-ge.ch. Accessed 16 Nov 2016

  39. Shapiro DL (2009) Torts, damages, and malpractice. Psychol Inj and Law 2:100–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sechste Europäische Konferenz zur Gesundheitsförderung in Haft. Patient or Prisoner? (6ème conférence européenne pour la promotion de la santé en prison. Patient oun prissonier?) Geneva, 1–3 Feb 2012

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reinhard Dettmeyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dettmeyer, R. (2017). Current and Future Evidence in Personal Injury Ascertainment Under Criminal Law. In: Ferrara, S. (eds) P5 Medicine and Justice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67092-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics