Skip to main content

A Modified Vickrey Auction with Regret Minimization for Uniform Alliance Decisions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 777 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 737))

Abstract

We consider a supply chain management problem where a business alliance of small capacity retailers needs to collectively select a unique supplier considering the assignment’s efficiency at both the alliance and retailers’ level. We model the alliance as a multi-agent system. For this model, we present a modified Vickrey auction algorithm with regret minimization and compare it experimentally with aggregation of preferences by voting and standard Vickrey auction. Through simulation, we show that the proposed method on average reaches globally efficient and individually acceptable solutions. The solutions are evaluated in terms of different social welfare values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Banerjee, S., Konishi, H., Sönmez, T.: Core in a simple coalition formation game. Soc. Choice Welfare 18(1), 135–153 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bertsekas, D.: The auction algorithm for assignment and other network flow problems: a tutorial. Interfaces 133–149 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brams, S.J., Kilgour, D.M.: Fallback bargaining. Group Decis. Negotiat. 10(4), 287–316 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brandt, F., Conitzer, V., Endriss, U.: Computational social choice. In: Weiss, G. (ed.) Multiagent Systems. MIT Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chalkiadakis, G., Markakis, E., Jennings, N.R.: Coalitional stability in structured environments. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2012, vol. 2, pp. 779–786 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenhardt, K.M., Schoonhoven, C.B.: Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organ. Sci. 7(2), 136–150 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Endriss, U., Maudet, N.: Welfare engineering in multiagent systems. In: Omicini, A., Petta, P., Pitt, J. (eds.) Engineering Societies in the Agents World IV, LNCS, vol. 3071, pp. 93–106. Springer (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Green, J.R., Laffont, J.J.: Incentives in Public Decision Making (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hemaspaandra, E., Hemaspaandra, L.A., Rothe, J.: Exact analysis of Dodgson elections: Lewis carroll’s 1876 voting system is complete for parallel access to NP. J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 44(6), 806–825 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Holmström, B.: Groves’ scheme on restricted domains. Econom.: J. Econom. Soc. 1137–1144 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Koenig, S., Zheng, X., Tovey, C., et al.: Agent coordination with regret clearing. In: Proceedings of AAAI’08, vol. 1, pp. 101–107 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Loomes, G., Sugden, R.: Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econ. J. 92(368), 805–824 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lu, T., Boutilier, C.: Robust approximation and incremental elicitation in voting protocols. In: Proceedings of the 22nd IJCAI, vol. 1, pp. 287–293 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lujak, M., Giordani, S.: On the communication range in auction-based multi-agent target assignment. In: IWSOS’11: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Self-organizing Systems. LNCS, vol. 6557, pp. 32–43 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lujak, M., Giordani, S.: Value of incomplete information in mobile target allocation. In: MATES’11: Proceedings of the 9th German Conference on Multiagent System Technologies. LNCS, vol. 5774, pp. 89–100 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Morden, T.: Principles of Strategic Management. Routledge (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pycia, M.: Stability and preference alignment in matching and coalition formation. Econometrica 80(1), 323–362 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Sambasivan, M., Siew-Phaik, L., Mohamed, Z.A., Leong, Y.C.: Impact of interdependence between supply chain partners on strategic alliance outcomes: role of relational capital as a mediating construct. Manag. Decis. 49(4), 548–569 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sandholm, T.: Making markets and democracy work: a story of incentives and computing. In: Proceedings of the 18th IJCAI, pp. 1649–1671. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Savage, L.J.: The theory of statistical decision. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 46(253), 55–67 (1951)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Sethuraman, J., Teo, C.P., Qian, L.: Many-to-one stable matching: geometry and fairness. Math. Oper. Res. 31(3), 581–596 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Stoye, J.: Axioms for minimax regret choice correspondences. J. Econ. Theory 146(6), 2226–2251 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Tadenuma, K.: Efficiency first or equity first? Two principles and rationality of social choice. J. Econ. Theory 104(2), 462–472 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Tjemkes, B., Vos, P., Burgers, K.: Strategic Alliance Management. Routledge (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Van Deemen, A.M.: Coalition Formation and Social Choice, vol. 19. Springer Science & Business Media (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vickrey, W.: Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance 16(1), 8–37 (1961)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu, W.Y., Shih, H.A., Chan, H.C.: The analytic network process for partner selection criteria in strategic alliances. Expert. Syst. Appl. 36(3), 4646–4653 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang, J., Wang, J., Wong, C.W.Y., Lai, K.H.: Relational stability and alliance performance in supply chain. Omega 36(4), 600–608 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marin Lujak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lujak, M., Slavkovik, M. (2018). A Modified Vickrey Auction with Regret Minimization for Uniform Alliance Decisions. In: Ivanović, M., Bădică, C., Dix, J., Jovanović, Z., Malgeri, M., Savić, M. (eds) Intelligent Distributed Computing XI. IDC 2017. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 737. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66379-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66379-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-66378-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-66379-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics