Abstract
If EU Member States face similar energy security challenges, but often opt for differing interpretations and policy solutions, how can we assess their potential for energy cooperation? An important divisive factor is the divergent understanding of 'energy security'. How does it differ between states, energy sectors and within each sector? These are the main questions that the entire edited volume tries to answer. This introductory chapter begins with a broad literature review on the way ‘energy security’ should be understood. After presenting the most conventional definition which originates in the policy realm and visibly dominates the field, I discuss three approaches to elaborating and (re)defining 'energy security'. These are dubbed: inductive, abductive and deductive. I then argue for the importance of a 'deductively' acquired analytical concept of ‘energy security’, allowing to distinguish it properly from other areas of security and other policy fields. Defining energy security as ‘low vulnerability of vital energy systems’ (Cherp and Jewell, Energy Policy 75:415–421, 2014), allows for the operationalisation of the general research problem posed earlier. I then present the rationale of the two parts of the book, and conclude with an overview of the chapters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The meanings of the verb include: to make certain; ensure; to guarantee; to get possession of; acquire; to bring about as well as to protect from danger or risk. Compare my take on the matter with Bridge’s thesis that ‘energy security’ implies a ‘securitisation of energy’ which ‘normalizes certain practices of resource use, and establishes grounds for intervention’ (2015: 328 and 336).
- 2.
While ‘energy security’ is not reducible to ‘supply security’, this is not to say that ‘security of demand’ should necessarily be integrated into the definition. That is something that many scholars (Austvik 2016; Brauch 2015; Cao and Bluth 2013; Reddy 2015) and especially energy-exporting states emphasise. There are, however, good reasons not to treat ‘demand security’ as a necessary element of energy security—leaving it rather to international trade.
- 3.
The by now canonical least of features ‘making a concept good’ in the social sciences is provided by Gerring (2011): (1) familiarity, (2) resonance, (3) parsimony, (4) coherence, (5) differentiation, (6) depth, (7) theoretical utility and (8) field utility.
- 4.
An earlier definition, similar to the one proposed by Cherp and Jewell (2014) was developed in the Global Energy Assessment by, among others, these authors, as ‘uninterrupted provision of vital energy services’ (my italics). This availability-based and consumption-centred definition is something mid-way between a conventional and an analytical one. See: Cherp et al. (2012).
- 5.
They themselves speak of an ‘interdisciplinary Energy security studies’.
- 6.
As a matter of fact, this contextualised meaning of energy and energy security was already present in Yergin’s (1988) approach, but few scholars noted the latter part of his definition: ‘major national and objectives’.
References
Aalto, Pami, and Dicle Korkmaz Temel. 2014. European Energy Security: Natural Gas and the Integration Process. Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (4): 758–774. doi:10.1111/jcms.12108.
Ang, B.W., W.L. Choong, and T.S. Ng. 2015. Energy Security: Definitions, Dimensions and Indexes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 42: 1077–1093. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.064.
Austvik, Ole G. 2016. The Energy Union and Security-of-Gas Supply. Energy Policy 96: 372–382. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.06.013.
Bahgat, Gawdat, ed. 2011. Energy Security. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Böhringer, Christoph, and Markus Bortolamedi. 2015. Sense and No(n)-sense of Energy Security Indicators. Ecological Economics 119: 359–371. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.09.020.
Brauch, Hans G. 2015. Environmental and Energy Security: Conceptual Evolution and Potential Applications to European Cross-Border Energy Supply Infrastructure. In Environmental Security of the European Cross-Border Energy Supply Infrastructure, NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security, ed. M.G. Culshaw, V.I. Osipov, S.J. Booth, and A.S. Victorov, 155–185. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Bridge, Gavin. 2015. Energy (In)security: World-Making in an Age of Scarcity. The Geographical Journal 181 (4): 328–339. doi:10.1111/geoj.12114.
Buzan, Barry, and Ole Wæver. 2003. Regions and Powers: A Guide to the Global Security Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Pub.
Cao, Wensheng, and Christoph Bluth. 2013. Challenges and Countermeasures of China’s Energy Security. Energy Policy 53: 381–388. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.070.
Carroccio, Anna, Maria Crescimanno, Antonino Galati, and Antonio Tulone. 2016. The Land Grabbing in the International Scenario: The Role of the EU in Land Grabbing. Agricultural and Food Economics 4 (1): 34. doi:10.1186/s40100-016-0056-7.
Chakrabarti, A., and R.K. Arora. 2016. Indias Energy Security: Critical Considerations. Global Business Review. doi:10.1177/0972150916660443.
Cheon, A., and J. Urpelainen. 2015. Escaping Oil’s Stranglehold: When Do States Invest in Energy Security? Journal of Conflict Resolution 59 (6): 953–983. doi:10.1177/0022002713520529.
Cherp, Aleh. 2012. Defining Energy Security Takes More Than Asking Around. Energy Policy 48: 841–842. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.016.
Cherp, Aleh, and Jessica Jewell. 2011. The Three Perspectives on Energy Security: Intellectual History, Disciplinary Roots and the Potential for Integration. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 3 (4): 202–212. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2011.07.001.
———. 2013. Energy Security Assessment Framework and Three Case Studies. In International Handbook of Energy Security, ed. Hugh Dyer and Maria J. Trombetta, 146–173. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
———. 2014. The Concept of Energy Security: Beyond the Four As. Energy Policy 75: 415–421. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.005.
Cherp, Aleh, Adeola Adenikinju, Andreas Goldthau, Francisco Hernandez, Larry Hughes, Jaap Jansen, Jessica Jewell, Marina Olshanskaya, Ricardo Soares de Oliveira, Benjamin Sovacool, and Sergey Vakulenko. 2012. Energy and Security. In Global Energy Assessment—Toward a Sustainable Future, 325–338. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cherp, Aleh, Jessica Jewell, Vadim Vinichenko, Nico Bauer, and Enrica de Cian. 2016. Global Energy Security Under Different Climate Policies, GDP Growth Rates and Fossil Resource Availabilities. Climatic Change 136 (1): 83–94. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0950-x.
Ciută, Felix. 2010. Conceptual Notes on Energy Security: Total or Banal Security? Security Dialogue 41 (2): 123–144. doi:10.1177/0967010610361596.
Corry, Olaf. 2012. Securitisation and ‘Riskification’: Second-Order Security and the Politics of Climate Change. Millennium 40 (2): 235–258. doi:10.1177/0305829811419444.
Cox, Emily. 2016. Opening the Black Box of Energy Security: A Study of Conceptions of Electricity Security in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science 21: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2016.06.020.
Dellecker, Adrian, and Thomas Gomart. 2011. Russian Energy Security and Foreign Policy: Energy Security in Eurasia, Routledge/GARNET Series, Europe in the World. London: Routledge.
European Commission. 2014. European Energy Security Strategy. Brussels.
———. 2017. Energy Security Strategy. https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/energy-strategy-and-energy-union/energy-security-strategy.
Gerring, John. 2011. What Makes a Concept Good? A Criterial Framework for Understanding Concept Formation in the Social Sciences. Polity 31 (3): 357–393.
Guzzini, S. 2011. Securitization as a Causal Mechanism. Security Dialogue 42 (4–5): 329–341. doi:10.1177/0967010611419000.
Hughes, Larry. 2012. A Generic Framework for the Description and Analysis of Energy Security in an Energy System. Energy Policy 42: 221–231. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.079.
Johansson, Bengt. 2013a. A Broadened Typology on Energy and Security. Energy 53: 199–205. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.03.012.
———. 2013b. Security Aspects of Future Renewable Energy Systems—A Short Overview. Energy 61: 598–605. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.09.023.
Judge, Andrew, and Tomas Maltby. 2017. European Energy Union? Caught Between Securitisation and ‘Riskification’. European Journal of International Security 2 (02): 179–202. doi:10.1017/eis.2017.3.
Kalicki, Jan H., and David L. Goldwyn. 2013. Energy and Security: Strategies for a World in Transition, ed. Jan H. Kalicki and David L. Goldwyn, 2nd ed. Washington/Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center Press/Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kama, Kärg. 2016. Contending Geo-Logics: Energy Security, Resource Ontologies, and the Politics of Expert Knowledge in Estonia. Geopolitics 21 (4): 831–856. doi:10.1080/14650045.2016.1210129.
Khrushcheva, Olga. 2011. The Creation of an Energy Security Society as a Way to Decrease Securitization Levels Between the European Union and Russia in Energy Trade. Journal of Contemporary European Research 7 (2): 216–230.
Kisel, Einari, Arvi Hamburg, Mihkel Härm, Ando Leppiman, and Märt Ots. 2016. Concept for Energy Security Matrix. Energy Policy 95: 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.034.
Kline, Keith L., Siwa Msangi, Virginia H. Dale, Jeremy Woods, Glaucia M. Souza, Patricia Osseweijer, Joy S. Clancy, et al. 2016. Reconciling Food Security and Bioenergy: Priorities for Action. GCB Bioenergy. doi:10.1111/gcbb.12366.
Kurian, A.L., and C. Vinodan. 2013. Energy Security: A Multivariate Analysis of Emerging Trends and Implications for South Asia. India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs 69 (4): 383–400. doi:10.1177/0974928413503749.
Layton, S. 2014. Reframing European Security: Russia’s Proposal for a New European Security Architecture. International Relations 28 (1): 25–45. doi:10.1177/0047117813507734.
Månsson, André, Bengt Johansson, and Lars J. Nilsson. 2014a. Assessing Energy Security: An Overview of Commonly Used Methodologies. Energy 73: 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.06.073.
Månsson, André, Alessandro Sanches-Pereira, and Sebastian Hermann. 2014b. Biofuels for Road Transport: Analysing Evolving Supply Chains in Sweden from an Energy Security Perspective. Applied Energy 123: 349–357. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.098.
McCollum, David, Nico Bauer, Katherine Calvin, Alban Kitous, and Keywan Riahi. 2014. Fossil Resource and Energy Security Dynamics in Conventional and Carbon-Constrained Worlds. Climatic Change 123 (3–4): 413–426. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0939-5.
Mišík, Matúš. 2016. On the Way Towards the Energy Union: Position of Austria, the Czech Republic and Slovakia Towards External Energy Security Integration. Energy 111: 68–81. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.056.
———. 2017. Comments on “the Energy Union and Security-of-Gas Supply” by Ole Gunnar Austvik. Energy Policy 102: 27–29. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.011.
Molyneaux, Lynette, Colin Brown, Liam Wagner, and John Foster. 2016. Measuring Resilience in Energy Systems: Insights from a Range of Disciplines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 59: 1068–1079. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.063.
Narula, Kapil, and B.S. Reddy. 2015. Three Blind Men and an Elephant: The Case of Energy Indices to Measure Energy Security and Energy Sustainability. Energy 80: 148–158. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.11.055.
Natorski, Michal, and Anna Herranz Surrallés. 2008. Securitizing Moves to Nowhere? The Framing of the European Union’s Energy Policy. Journal of Contemporary European Research 4 (2): 71–89.
Nyman, Jonna. 2013. Ethics, Securitization and Energy Security: The Case of the United States. 8th Pan-European Conference on International Relations, Warsaw.
Nyman, Jonna, and Jinghan Zeng. 2016. Securitization in Chinese Climate and Energy Politics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 7 (2): 301–313. doi:10.1002/wcc.387.
Orttung, Robert W., and Indra Overland. 2011. A Limited Toolbox: Explaining the Constraints on Russia’s Foreign Energy Policy. Journal of Eurasian Studies 2 (1): 74–85. doi:10.1016/j.euras.2010.10.006.
Özcan, S. 2013. Securitization of Energy Through the Lenses of Copenhagen School. West East Institute Conference 2013, Orlando.
Perlot, Wilbur, and Femke Hoogeveen. 2007. The EU’s Policies of Security of Energy Supply Towards the Middle East and Caspian Region: Major Power Politics? Perspectives on Global Development and Technology 6 (1): 485–507. doi:10.1163/156914907X207847.
Proedrou, Filippos. 2016a. A New Framework for EU Energy Security: Putting Sustainability First. European Politics and Society: 1–17. doi:10.1080/23745118.2016.1215374.
———. 2016b. EU Energy Security Beyond Ukraine: Towards Holistic Diversification. European Foreign Affairs Review 21(1): 57–74. Accessed 1 Nov 2016.
Radovanović, Mirjana, Sanja Filipović, and Dejan Pavlović. 2016. Energy Security Measurement—A Sustainable Approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.02.010.
Rasul, Golam. 2014. Food, Water, and Energy Security in South Asia: A Nexus Perspective from the Hindu Kush Himalayan Region☆. Environmental Science & Policy 39: 35–48. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2014.01.010.
Reddy, B.S. 2015. Sustainable Energy Security for India—An Indicator-Based Approach. In Energy Security and Development, ed. B.S. Reddy and Sergio Ulgiati, 3–38. New Delhi: Springer India.
Sander, Michael. 2013. Conceptual Proposals for Measuring the Impact of International Regimes on Energy Security. Energy Policy 63: 449–457. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.127.
Skalamera, Morena. 2015. Energy Security in the Wake of the Ukraine Crisis. Getting the Real Threats Right. http://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/articles/climate-change-energy-and-sustainability/energy-security-wake-ukraine-crisis-getting-real-t. Accessed 9 July 2016.
Smith-Stegen, Karen. 2011. Deconstructing the ‘Energy Weapon’: Russia’s Threat to Europe as a Case Study. Energy Policy 93 (10): 6505–6513.
Sovacool, Benjamin K. 2016. Differing Cultures of Energy Security: An International Comparison of Public Perceptions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 55: 811–822. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.144.
Sovacool, Benjamin K., and Ishani Mukherjee. 2011. Conceptualizing and Measuring Energy Security: A Synthesized Approach. Energy, PRES 2010 36(8): 5343–5355. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.043.
Sovacool, Benjamin K., and Harry Saunders. 2014. Competing Policy Packages and the Complexity of Energy Security. Energy 67: 641–651. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2014.01.039.
Speight, James G., ed. 2013. Coal-Fired Power Generation Handbook. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Stritzel, Holger. 2007. Towards a Theory of Securitization: Copenhagen and Beyond. European Journal of International Relations 13 (3): 357–383. doi:10.1177/1354066107080128.
Stulberg, Adam N. 2015. Out of Gas? Russia, Ukraine, Europe, and the Changing Geopolitics of Natural Gas. Problems of Post-Communism 62 (2): 112–130. doi:10.1080/10758216.2015.1010914.
Sussex, Matthew, and Roger E. Kanet. 2015. Russia, Eurasia and the New Geopolitics of Energy: Confrontation and Consolidation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Szulecki, Kacper, and Kirsten Westphal. 2014. The Cardinal Sins of European Energy Policy: Nongovernance in an Uncertain Global Landscape. Global Policy 5: 38–51. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12153.
Szulecki, Kacper, Severin Fischer, Anne T. Gullberg, and Oliver Sartor. 2016. Shaping the ‘Energy Union’: Between National Positions and Governance Innovation in EU Energy and Climate Policy. Climate Policy 16 (5): 1–20. doi:10.1080/14693062.2015.1135100.
Thangavelu, Sundar R., Ashwin M. Khambadkone, and Iftekhar A. Karimi. 2015. Long-Term Optimal Energy Mix Planning Towards High Energy Security and Low GHG Emission. Applied Energy 154: 959–969. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.087.
Tidwell, A.S.D., and J.M. Smith. 2015. Morals, Materials, and Technoscience: The Energy Security Imaginary in the United States. Science, Technology & Human Values 40 (5): 687–711. doi:10.1177/0162243915577632.
Tunsjo, O. 2010. Hedging Against Oil Dependency: New Perspectives on China’s Energy Security Policy. International Relations 24 (1): 25–45. doi:10.1177/0047117809340543.
Tusk, Donald. 2014. A United Europe Can End Russia’s Energy Stranglehold. Financial Times, April 21.
Vivoda, Vlado. 2012. Japan’s Energy Security Predicament Post-Fukushima. Energy Policy 46: 135–143. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.03.044.
Weldes, Jutta. 1999. Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Wigell, Mikeal, and Antto Vihma. 2016. Geopolitics Versus Geoeconomics: The Case of Russia’s Geostrategy and Its Effects on the EU. International Affairs 92 (3): 605–627. doi:10.1111/1468-2346.12600.
Winzer, Christian. 2012. Conceptualizing Energy Security. Energy Policy 46: 36–48. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.067.
Yergin, Daniel. 1988. Energy Security in the 1990s. Foreign Affairs 67 (1): 69–82.
———. 2006. Ensuring Energy Security. Foreign Affairs 85 (2): 69–82.
Youngs, Richard. 2014. A New Geopolitics of EU Energy Security. Carnegie Europe, September 23.
Zabyelina, Y., and I. Kustova. 2015. Energy and Conflict: Security Outsourcing in the Protection of Critical Energy Infrastructures. Cooperation and Conflict 50 (4): 531–549. doi:10.1177/0010836714558640.
Zeniewski, Peter. 2011. Poland’s Energy Security and the Origins of the Yamal Contract with Russia. The Polish Quarterly of International Affairs 20 (2): 38–62.
Ziegler, C.E. 2013. Energy Pipeline Networks and Trust: The European Union and Russia in Comparative Perspective. International Relations 27 (1): 3–29. doi:10.1177/0047117812460879.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Szulecki, K. (2018). The Multiple Faces of Energy Security: An Introduction. In: Szulecki, K. (eds) Energy Security in Europe. Energy, Climate and the Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64964-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64963-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64964-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)