Skip to main content

Conceptual and Institutional Origins of Gender Budgeting

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter charts the historical development of gender budgeting as it travelled into use in Europe and critically engages in the different conceptual origins and definitions. First given institutional support within the Platform for Action of the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing 1995, a normative framework has developed across European countries but arguably gender budgeting has been variously and weakly implemented.

This analysis draws together arguments for gender budgeting as feminist policy change and the institutional resistances encountered in advancing such transformative change, as highlighted in concepts from feminist policy analysis, feminist institutionalism, and feminist economics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Fawcett v HM Advocate 2010 EWHC 3522.

References

  • Annesley, Claire. 2010. Gender, Politics and Policy Change: The Case of Welfare Reform Under New Labour. Government and Opposition 45 (1): 50–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annesley, Claire, and Francesca Gains. 2012. Investigating the Economic Determinants of the UK Gender Equality Policy Agenda. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 15 (1): 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 2009. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beigewum. 2002. Frauen macht Budgets. Staatsfinanzen aus Geschlechterperspektive. Vienna: Mandelbaum Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budlender, Debbie. 1996. The Women’s Budget. Cape Town: Idasa.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. The South African Women’s Budget Initiative. Background Paper No. 2. Meeting on Women and Political Participation: 21st Century Challenges, United Nations Development Programme, 24–26 March 1999. New Delhi, India. Community Agency for Social Enquiry. Cape Town: South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. The Political Economy of Women’s Budgets in the South. World Development 28 (7): 1365–1378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Expectations Versus Realities in Gender-Responsive Budget Initiatives. New York: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budlender, Debbie, and Guy Hewitt, eds. 2002. Gender Budgets Make Cents. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calgay, Gulay. 2010. Multiple Meanings of Gender Budgeting: Gender Knowledge and Economic Knowledge in the World Bank and UNDP. In Gender Knowledge and Knowledge Networks in International Political Economy, ed. Brigitte Young and Christoph Scherrer. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çağatay, Nilüfer, Mümtaz Keklik, Radhika Lal, and James Lang. 2000. Budgets as If People Mattered: Democratizing Macroeconomic Policies. In Social Development and Poverty Elimination Division, Bureau of Development Policy. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celis, Karen, Sarah Childs, Johanna Kantola, and Mona Lena Krook. 2008. Rethinking Women’s Substantive Representation. Representation 44 (2): 99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, Louise. 2002. The ‘Femocrat’ Strategy: Expanding the Repertoire of Feminist Activists. Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Comparing Political Institutions: Revealing the Gendered ‘Logic of Appropriateness’. Politics and Gender 2 (2): 223–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, Louise, and Jill Vickers. 2011. Introduction. Politics & Gender 7 (2): 251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe. 2005. Council of Europe Final Report of Group of Specialists on Gender Budgeting. Strasbourg: Directorate of Human Rights, Council of Europe. Available at https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?id=1215219&Site=CM&BackColorInternet=C3C3C3&BackColorIntranet=EDB021&BackColorLogged=F5D383.asp.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Council of Europe Recommendation on Gender Equality Standards and Mechanisms. Strasbourg: Directorate of Human Rights, Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, Ronnie, Lisa von Trapp, and Scherie Nicol. 2016. Gender Budgeting in OECD Countries. OECD Journal on Budgeting 2016 (3): 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elson, Diane. 1997. Gender-Neutral, Gender-Blind, or Gender-Sensitive Budgets? Changing the Conceptual Framework to Include Women’s Empowerment and the Economy of Care. Preparatory Country Mission to Integrate Gender into National Budgetary Policies and Procedures in the Context of Economic Reform. Background Paper. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Gender Budget Initiative: Background Papers. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Gender Budget Initiatives. In Gender Budget Initiatives Strategies, Concepts and Experiences. Papers from a High Level International Conference ‘Strengthening Economic and Financial Governance Through Gender Responsive Budgeting’ Brussels, 16–18 October 2001. United Nations Development Fund for Women. Available at http://www.unwomen.org/-/media/headquarters/media/publications/unifem/genderbudgetinitiativeseng.pdf?vs=1011. Accessed 26 June 2017.

  • ———. 2016. Gender Budgeting and Macro Economic Policy. In Feminist Economics and Public Policy: Reflections on the Work and Impact of Ailsa McKay, ed. Jim Campbell and Morag Gillespie, 29–40. Abingdon: Routledge IAFFE Advances in Feminist Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2003. Opinion of European Commission Advisory Committee on Equal Opportunities for Women and Men. Brussels: European Commission. Available at http://www.lex.unict.it/eurolabor/documentazione/altridoc/po/opinion_may03.pdf

  • ———. 2012. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2012/C 326/02). Available at http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/charter/index_en.htm

  • European Parliament. 2003. Resolution on Gender Budgeting – Building Public Budgets from a Gender Perspective. Strasbourg: European Parliament. Available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDocdo?type=REPORT&reference=A5-2003-0214&language=EN

  • Equality and Human Rights Commission. 2012. Making Fair Financial Decisions an Assessment of HM Treasury’s 2010 Spending Review Conducted Under Section 31 of the 2006 Equality Act. Manchester: EHRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Regina. 2008. Paradoxes of Gender Budgeting. In The First International Conference on GRB and Social Justice, DP, vol. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heclo, Hugh, and Aaron Wildavsky. 1981. The Private Government of Public Money: Community and Policy Inside British Politics. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepple, Bob. 2014. Equality: The Legal Framework. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelweit, Susan. 2002. Making Visible the Hidden Economy: The Case for Gender-Impact Analysis of Economic Policy. Feminist Economics 8 (1): 49–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofbauer Balmori, H. 2003. Gender and Budgets: Overview Report. Institute of Development. Brighton: BRIDGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, John W. 1995. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klatzer, Elisabeth. 2006. The Role of Parliaments in Gender Budgeting. “The Role of Parliamentary Commitees in Mainstreaming Gender and Promoting the Status of Women” Seminar for Members of Parliamentary Bodies Dealing with Gender Equality, 4–6 December 2006, Inter-Parliamentary Union, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krafchik, W., and J. Wehner. 1998. The Role of Parliament in the Budget Process. South African Journal of Economics 66 (4): 512–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krook, Mona Lena, and Fiona Mackay. 2010. Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krug, Barbara, and Irene Van Staveren. 1999. Gender Audit: Whim or Voice. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Faculteit Bedrijfskunde/Rotterdam School of Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, Judith. 2000. Using Gender to Undo Gender: A Feminist Degendering Movement. Feminist Theory 1 (1): 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovenduski, Joni. 1998. Gendering Research in Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science 1 (1): 1333–1356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, Fiona, Meryl Kenny, and Louise Chappell. 2010. New Institutionalism Through a Gender Lens: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism? International Political Science Review 31 (5): 573–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks Rubin, Marilyn, and John R. Bartle. 2005. Integrating Gender into Government Budgets: A New Perspective. Public Administration Review 65 (3): 259–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazur, Amy. 2002. Theorizing Feminist Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, Ailsa. 2004. Developing a Gender Budget Initiative: A Question of Process or Policy? Lessons Learned from the Scottish Experience. Gender Studies 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hagan, Angela. 2016. Challenging the Norms: Gender Budgeting as Feminist Policy Change. In Feminist Economics and Public Policy: Reflections on the Work and Impact of Ailsa McKay. Routledge IAFFE Advances in Feminist Economics, ed. Jim Campbell and Morag Gillespie, 41–49. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, Sheila. 2016. Europe: A Survey of Gender Budgeting Efforts. IMF Working Paper, WP/16/155. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, Teresa. 2006. Mainstreaming Equality in the European Union. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubery, Jill. 2005. Reflections on Gender Mainstreaming: An Example of Feminist Economics in Action? Feminist Economics 11 (3): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, Paul A. 1999. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawer, Marion. 2002. Australia: The Mandarin Approach to Gender Budgets. In Gender Budgets Make More Cents, 43–64. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Gita. 2000. Gender Mainstreaming in Finance Ministries. World Development 28 (7): 1379–1390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, Rhonda. 2003. Budgeting for Equity: Gender Budget Initiatives Within a Framework of Performance Oriented Budgeting. New York: United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, Rhonda, and Ray Broomhill. 2002. Budgeting for Equality: The Australian Experience. Feminist Economics 8 (1): 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, Rhonda, and Sanjugta Vas Dev. 2004. Bridging the Gap Between Gender Analysis and Gender-Responsive Budgets: Key Lessons from a Pilot Project in the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Magill: Hawke Research Institute, University of South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Jenny. 2006. Value Conflict and Policy Change. Review of Policy Research 23 (1): 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stotsky, Janet. 2016. Gender Budgeting: Fiscal Context and Overview of Current Outcomes. International Monetary Fund Working Paper WP/16/149. Washington, DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 1995. Platform for Action. Fourth World Conference on Women: Action for Equality, Development and Peace. Beijing, September 1995. Available at http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/platform

  • Verloo, Meike, and Emanuela Lombardo. 2007. Contested Gender Equality and Policy Variety in Europe: Introducing a Critical Frame Analysis Approach. In Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe, 21–49. New York: CEU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring, Marilyn. 1989. If Women Counted: A New Feminist Economics. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky, Aaron B. 1964. Politics of the Budgetary Process. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

O’Hagan, A. (2018). Conceptual and Institutional Origins of Gender Budgeting. In: O'Hagan, A., Klatzer, E. (eds) Gender Budgeting in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64891-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64891-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64890-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64891-0

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics