Abstract
A popular approach for empirical modeling is through representing a phenomenon as a linear combination of a set of predefined basis functions, such as polynomial and harmonic functions. In comparison with predefined basis functions, the empirical orthogonal basis functions (EOFs) are constructed from the dataset according to the variance distribution, and typically summarize the data into representative features. This chapter reviews comparatively three applications of EOF analysis associated with multivariate linear regression in empirical modeling, namely in the models of the Earth’s ionospheric F 2 -layer peak, the field-aligned currents at Earth, and the induced magnetic field near Venus (He et al. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38(14): L14101, 2011; He et al. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, 2012; He et al. 2017; He et al. J. Geophys. Res., 121(4), 3362–3380, 2016). We illustrate the physical meaning represented by the most important EOFs, detail the model constructions and methodology, and highlight the revealed main scientific results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alken, P., Maus, S.: Spatio-temporal characterization of the equatorial electrojet from CHAMP, Ørsted, and SAC-C satellite magnetic measurements. J. Geophys. Res. 112(A9), A09305 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1029/2007ja012524
Boyle, C.B., Reiff, P.H., Hairston, M.R.: Empirical polar cap potentials. J. Geophys. Res. 102(A1), 111–125 (1997)
Chao, J.K., Wu, D.J., Lin, C.H., Yang, Y.H., Wang, X.Y., Kessel, M., Chen, S.H., Lepping, R.P.: Models for the size and shape of the earth's magnetopause and bow shock. COSPAR Colloq. Ser. 12, 127–135., L. Ling-Hsiao (Eds.), Pergamon (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-2749(02)80212-8
Dubinin, E., Fraenz, M., Woch, J., Zhang, T.L., Wei, Y., Fedorov, A., Barabash, S., Lundin, R.: Toroidal and poloidal magnetic fields at Venus. Venus express observations. Planet. Space Sci. 87, 19–29 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2012.12.003
He, M., Liu, L., Wan, W., Wei, Y.: Strong evidence for couplings between the ionospheric wave-4 structure and atmospheric tides. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38(14), L14101 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047855
He, M., Vogt, J., Luhr, H., Sorbalo, E., Blagau, A., Le, G., Lu, G.: A high-resolution model of field-aligned currents through empirical orthogonal functions analysis (MFACE). Geophys. Res. Lett., 39 (2012).doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2012gl053168
He, M., Vogt, J., Luhr, H., Sorbalo, E.: Local time resolved dynamics of field-aligned currents and their response to solar wind variability. J. Geophys. Res. 119(7), 5305–5315 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JA019776
He, M., Vogt, J., Zhang, T., Rong, Z.: EMVIM: an empirical model for the magnetic field configuration near venus. J. Geophys. Res. 121(4), 3362–3380 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA022049
He, M., J. Vogt, D. Heyner, and J. Zhong (2017), Vogt, J., Heyner. D., Zhong. J.: Solar wind controls on Mercury's magnetospheric cusp, J. Geophys. Res. Space Physics, 122, 6150–6164 (2017). https://doi:10.1002/2016JA023687
Iijima, T., Potemra, T.A.: Field-aligned currents in the dayside cusp observed by triad. J. Geophys. Res. 81(34), 5971–5979 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1029/JA081i034p05971
Iijima, T., Potemra, T.A.: Large-scale characteristics of field-aligned currents associated with substorms. J. Geophys. Res. 83(A2), 599–615 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1029/JA083iA02p00599
Martinecz, C., et al.: Location of the bow shock and ion composition boundaries at Venus—initial determinations from venus express ASPERA-4. Planet. Space Sci. 56(6), 780–784 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2007.07.007
Masters, A., Achilleos, N., Dougherty, M.K., Slavin, J.A., Hospodarsky, G.B., Arridge, C.S., Coates, A.J.: An empirical model of Saturn's bow shock: cassini observations of shock location and shape. J. Geophys. Res. 113(A10), A10210 (2008a). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008ja013276
Masters, A., Achilleos, N., Dougherty, M.K., Slavin, J.A., Hospodarsky, G.B., Arridge, C.S., Coates, A.J.: An empirical model of Saturn's bow shock: cassini observations of shock location and shape. J. Geophys. Res. 113(A10), (2008b). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008ja013276
Maus, S., Rother, M., Stolle, C., Mai, W., Choi, S., Lühr, H., Cooke, D., Roth, C.: Third generation of the Potsdam Magnetic Model of the Earth (POMME). Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 7(7), Q07008 (2006)
Olsen, N.: A new tool for determining ionospheric currents from magnetic satellite data. Geophys. Res. Lett. 23(24), 3635–3638 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1029/96gl02896
Papitashvili, V. O., F. Christiansen, and T. Neubert (2002), V.O., Christiansen, F., Neubert, T.: A new model of field-aligned currents derived from high-precision satellite magnetic field data. Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(14), 1683 (2002). https://doi.10.1029/2001gl014207
Shue, J.H., et al.: Magnetopause location under extreme solar wind conditions. J. Geophys. Res. 103(A8), 17691–17700 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1029/98JA01103
Tsyganenko, N.A.: Data-based modelling of the Earth's dynamic magnetosphere: a review. Ann. Geophys. 31(10), 1745–1772 (2013a). https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-1745-2013
Tsyganenko, N.A.: Empirical magnetic field models for the space weather program. Space Weather. 273–280 (2013b). https://doi.org/10.1029/GM125p0273. American Geophysical Union
Tsyganenko, N. A., Andreeva, V.A., Gordeev, E. I.: Internally and externally induced deformations of the magnetospheric equatorial current as inferred from spacecraft data. Ann. Geophys., 33(1) (2015).doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-33-1-2015
Zhong, J., et al.: Mercury's three-dimensional asymmetric magnetopause. J. Geophys. Res. 120(9), 7658–7671 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JA021425
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the online services provided by NASA’s Planetary Data System (MESSENGER data), ESA’s Planetary Science Archive (VEX data), GFZ Potsdam (CHAMP data), NGDC (POMME-6.2 coefficients), John Hopkins University APL (AACGM coefficients), and NASA OMNI (IMF/SW and other geophysical parameters). The corresponding codes are available on Source Forge or File change of MATLAB Central. This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft through grants DFG HE6915/1-1 and VO 855/3-1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
He, M., Vogt, J. (2018). Empirical Modeling of Planetary Magnetospheres in Response to Solar Wind Dynamics Using EOF Analysis and Multivariate Linear Regression. In: Lühr, H., Wicht, J., Gilder, S.A., Holschneider, M. (eds) Magnetic Fields in the Solar System. Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol 448. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64292-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64292-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64291-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64292-5
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)