Abstract
Social network analysis (SNA) typically appraises social groups by relying either on interaction patterns or on affiliation similarity. The former case represents the bulk of SNA approaches and relates to the so-called one-mode networks, which are by design blind to actor attributes. The latter case relates to what is denoted as two-mode networks and corresponds to a less abundant literature which uses actor attributes, yet eventually tends to focus much more on actor rather than attribute groups. This chapter aims to show how approaches such as formal concept analysis (FCA) make it possible to appraise actors and attributes on an equal footing. In the particular case of knowledge communities, where actor attributes represent cognitive properties, we deal with joint social and cognitive taxonomies, or socio-cognitive taxonomies. We further demonstrate that FCA also addresses several of the key traditional challenges of community detection in SNA—namely, overlapping groups, hierarchy, and temporal evolution and stability.
Notes
- 1.
“The most general case in which the persistence of the group presents itself as a problem occurs in the fact that, in spite of the departure and the change of members, the group remains identical. We say that it is the same state, the same association, the same army, which now exists that existed so and so many decades or centuries ago. This, although no single member of the original organization remains.” [64, p. 667]
References
Abbott, A.: Things of boundaries. Soc. Res. 62(4), 857–882 (1995)
Alba, R.D.: A graph-theoretic definition of a sociometric clique. J. Math. Sociol. 3, 113–126 (1973)
Arabie, P., Carroll, J.D.: Conceptions of overlap in social structure. In: Freeman, L.C., White, D.R., Romney, A.K. (eds.) Research Methods in Social Network Analysis, pp. 367–392. George Mason University Press, Fairfax, VA (1989)
Balamane, A., Missaoui, R., Kwuida, L., Vaillancourt, J.: Descriptive group detection in two-mode data networks using biclustering. In: Proc. of 2016 IEEE/ACM Intl. Conf. on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). IEEE Computer Society, San Francisco (2016)
Barbut, M., Monjardet, B.: Algèbre et Combinatoire, vol. II. Hachette, Paris (1970)
Bell, C., Newby, H.: Community Studies: An Introduction to the Sociology of the Local Community. Allen & Unwin, London (1972)
Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2008, P10008 (2008)
Boeck, P.D., Rosenberg, S.: Hierarchical classes: model and data analysis. Psychometrika 53(3), 361–381 (1988)
Bonacich, P.: Using boolean algebra to analyze overlapping memberships. Sociol. Methodol. 9, 101–115 (1978)
Breiger, R.L.: The duality of persons and groups. Soc. Forces 53(2), 181–190 (1974)
Buzmakov, A., Kuznetsov, S.O., Napoli, A.: Is concept stability a measure for pattern selection? Proc. Comput. Sci. 31, 918–927 (2014)
Capocci, A., Servedio, V., Caldarelli, G., Colaiori, F.: Detecting communities in large networks. Physica A 352, 660–676 (2005)
Cartwright, D., Harary, F.: Structural balance: a generalization of Heider’s theory. Psychol. Rev. 63, 277–292 (1956)
Clauset, A.: Finding local communities in networks. Phys. Rev. E 72, 026132 (2005)
Cohendet, P., Créplet, F., Dupouet, O.: Organisational innovation, communities of practice and epistemic communities: the case of Linux. In: Economics with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, pp. 303–326. Springer, Berlin (2001)
Cowan, R., David, P.A., Foray, D.: The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness. Ind. Corp. Chang. 9(2), 212–253 (2000)
Davis, J.A.: Clustering and structural balance in graphs. Hum. Relat. 20, 181–187 (1967)
Davis, J.A., Leinhardt, S.: The structure of positive interpersonal relations in small groups. In: Berger, J., Zelditch, M., Anderson, B. (eds.) Sociological Theories in Progress. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA (1970)
Doreian, P.: On the evolution of group and network structure. Soc. Netw. 2, 235–252 (1979)
Doreian, P., Mrvar, A.: A partitioning approach to structural balance. Soc. Netw. 18(2), 149–168 (1996)
Doreian, P., Mrvar, A.: Partitioning signed social networks. Soc. Netw. 31, 1–11 (2009)
Edling, C.R.: Mathematics in sociology. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 28, 197–220 (2002)
Elias, N.: Towards a theory of communities. In: Bell, C., Newby, H. (eds.) The Sociology of Community: A Selection of Readings. Routledge, London (1974)
Elzinga, P., Wolff, K., Poelmans, J.: Analyzing chat conversations of pedophiles with temporal relational semantic systems. In: Proc. 1st IEEE European Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics, pp. 242–249. Odense, Denmark (2012)
Everett, M.G.: Role similarity and complexity in social networks. Soc. Netw. 7, 353–359 (1985)
Everett, M.G., Borgatti, S.P.: Analyzing clique overlap. Connections 21(1), 49–61 (1998)
Forsyth, E., Katz, L.: A matrix approach to the analysis of sociometric data: preliminary report. Sociometry 9(4), 340–347 (1946)
Fortunato, S.: Community detection in graphs. Phys. Rep. 486, 75—174 (2010)
Freeman, L.C.: The sociological concept of ‘group’: an empirical test of two models. Am. J. Sociol. 98(1), 152–166 (1992)
Freeman, L.C.: Un modèle de la structure des interactions dans les groupes. Rev. Fr. Sociol. 36, 743–757 (1995)
Freeman, L.C.: Finding social groups: a meta-analysis of the Southern women data. In: Breiger, R., Carley, K., Pattison, P. (eds.) Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis, pp. 39–97. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC (2003)
Freeman, L.C., White, D.R.: Using Galois lattices to represent network data. Sociol. Methodol. 23, 127–146 (1993)
Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Berlin (1999)
Girvan, M., Newman, M.E.J.: Community structure in social and biological networks. PNAS 99, 7821–7826 (2002)
Gnatyshak, D., Ignatov, D.I., Semenov, A., Poelmans, J.: Gaining insight in social networks with biclustering and triclustering. In: Aseeva, N., Babkin, E., Kozyrev, O. (eds.) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research BIR 2012: 11th Intl. Conf., Nizhny Novgorod, Russia, Sept 24–26, pp. 162–171. Springer, Berlin (2012)
Haas, P.: Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int. Organ. 46(1), 1–35 (1992)
Heider, F.: Attitudes and cognitive organization. J. Psychol. 21, 107–112 (1946)
Hutchins, E.: Distributed cognition. In: Smelser, N.J., Baltes, P.B. (eds.) International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, pp. 2068–2072. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2001)
Klimushkin, M., Obiedkov, S., Roth, C.: Approaches to the selection of relevant concepts in the case of noisy data. In: Kwuida, L., Sertkaya, B. (eds.) Proc. 8th Intl. Conf. Formal Concept Analysis. LNCS/LNAI, vol. 5986, pp. 255–266. Springer, Berlin (2010)
Knorr-Cetina, K.: Scientific communities or transepistemic arenas of research? A critique of quasi-economic models of science. Soc. Stud. Sci. 12(1), 101–130 (1982)
Kuznetsov, S.: Stability as an estimate of degree of substantiation of hypotheses derived on the basis of operational similarity. Nauchn. Tekh. Inf. 2(12), 21–29 (1990)
Kuznetsov, S., Obiedkov, S., Roth, C.: Reducing the representation complexity of lattice-based taxonomies. In: Priss, U., Polovina, S., Hill, R. (eds.) Conceptual Structures: Knowledge Architectures for Smart Applications: 15th Intl. Conf. on Conceptual Structures, ICCS 2007, Sheffield, UK. LNCS/LNAI, vol. 4604, pp. 241–254. Springer, Berlin (2007)
Latapy, M., Magnien, C., Vecchio, N.D.: Basic notions for the analysis of large two-mode networks. Soc. Netw. 30(1), 31–48 (2008)
Lehmann, S., Schwartz, M., Hansen, L.K.: Biclique communities. Phys. Rev. E 78, 016108 (2008)
Lorrain, F., White, H.C.: Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. J. Math. Sociol. 1(49–80) (1971)
Luce, R.D.: Connectivity and generalized cliques in sociometric group structure. Psychometrika 15, 169–190 (1950)
Luce, R.D., Perry, A.: A method of matrix analysis of group structure. Psychometrika 14, 95–116 (1949)
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J.M.: Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27, 415–444 (2001)
Mitra, B., Tabourier, L., Roth, C.: Intrinsically dynamic network communities. Comput. Netw. 56(3), 1041–1053 (2012)
Moody, J.: Peer influence groups: identifying dense clusters in large networks. Soc. Netw. 23, 261–283 (2001)
Newman, M.E.J.: Detecting community structure in networks. Eur. Phys. J. B 38, 321–330 (2004)
Newman, M.E.J.: Modularity and community structure in networks. PNAS 103(23), 8577–8582 (2006)
Palla, G., Barabási, A.L., Vicsek, T.: Quantifying social group evolution. Nature 446, 664–667 (2007)
Palla, G., Derényi, I., Farkas, I., Vicsek, T.: Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature 435, 814–818 (2005)
Poelmans, J., Ignatov, D.I., Kuznetsov, S.O., Dedene, G.: Formal concept analysis in knowledge processing: a survey on applications. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(16), 6538–6560 (2013)
Pothen, A., Simon, H.D., Liou, K.P.: Partitioning sparse matrices with eigenvectors of graphs. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 11(3), 430–452 (1990)
Rodriguez, M.A., Pepe, A.: On the relationship between the structural and socioacademic communities of a coauthorship network. J. Informet. 2, 195–201 (2008)
Roth, C.: Binding social and semantic networks. In: Proceedings of ECCS 2006, 2nd European Conference on Complex Systems, Oxford (2006)
Roth, C.: Communautés, analyse structurale et réseaux socio-sémantiques. In: Sainsaulieu, I., Salzbrunn, M., Amiotte-Suchet, L. (eds.) Faire communautén société – Dynamique des appartenances collectives, pp. 113–128. Presses Universitaires de Rennes, Rennes (2010)
Roth, C., Bourgine, P.: Lattice-based dynamic and overlapping taxonomies: the case of epistemic communities. Scientometrics 69(2), 429–447 (2006)
Roth, C., Obiedkov, S., Kourie, D.G.: Towards concise representation for taxonomies of epistemic communities. In: Yahia, S.B., Nguifo, E.M. (eds.) Proc. CLA 4th Intl. Conf. on Concept Lattices and Their Applications. LNCS/LNAI, vol. 4923, pp. 240–255. Springer, Berlin (2006)
Roth, C., Cointet, J.P., Obiedkov, S., Romashkin, N.: Analyse textuelle des motions du Congrès de Reims du PS (2008). http://tinyurl.com/39g6lch
Ruggie, J.G.: International responses to technology: concepts and trends. Int. Organ. 29(3), 557–583 (1975)
Simmel, G.: The persistence of social groups. Am. J. Sociol. 3(5), 662 (1898)
Soldano, H., Santini, G.: Graph abstraction for closed pattern mining in attributed networks. In: ECAI, pp. 849–854 (2014)
Soldano, H., Ventos, V.: Abstract concept lattices. In: Valtchev, P., Jäschke, R. (eds.) Proc. Intl. Conf. on Formal Concept Analysis (ICFCA). LNAI, vol. 6628, pp. 235–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Stumme, G., Taouil, R., Bastide, Y., Pasquier, N., Lakhal, L.: Computing iceberg concept lattices with TITANIC. Data Knowl. Eng. 42, 189–222 (2002)
Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)
Wellman, B., Carrington, P.J., Hall, A.: Networks as personal communities. In: Wellman, B., Berkowitz, S.D. (eds.) Social Structures: A Network Analysis, pp. 130–184. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)
White, D.R., Harary, F.: The cohesiveness of block in social networks: node connectivity and conditional density. Sociol. Methodol. 31, 305–359 (2001)
White, D.R., Reitz, K.P.: Graph and semigroup homomorphisms on networks of relations. Soc. Netw. 5, 193–234 (1983)
White, H.C., Boorman, S.A., Breiger, R.L.: Social-structure from multiple networks. I: blockmodels of roles and positions. Am. J. Sociol. 81, 730–780 (1976)
Wille, R.: Concept lattices and conceptual knowledge systems. Comput. Math. Appl. 23, 493 (1992)
Wolff, K.: Applications of temporal conceptual semantic systems. In: Wolff, K., Palchunov, D.E., Zagoruiko, N.G. (eds.) Knowledge Processing and Data Analysis. LNAI, vol. 6581, pp. 59–78. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Acknowledgements
The present contribution partially relies on ideas introduced in a book chapter originally published in French and entitled “Communautés, analyse structurale et réseaux socio-sémantiques” [59].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roth, C. (2017). Knowledge Communities and Socio-Cognitive Taxonomies. In: Missaoui, R., Kuznetsov, S., Obiedkov, S. (eds) Formal Concept Analysis of Social Networks. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64167-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64167-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64166-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64167-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)